Warrior General Games

Originally posted by hatchman
Originally posted by yello1

*sad panda*

no I am not sad I get to log on and read your daily suggestions and wonder how anyone can bitch and complain so much about a online game. yet still play it

I was sad panda about no soup. Me likee soup.

Originally posted by hatchman
Originally posted by Skoll Wolfrun

I would have no problem with allowing Owners to have more teams in the same system (Regular, Casual, PeeWee).
Just toss in a limiter that will not allow them in the same League.

Seeing CPU teams in the upper leagues is just wrong on so many levels.


again where are you going to get eh players to fill these teams? It is easy to say to do one thing or another as far as how many teams a agent can own I really do not give a shit if there are enough players available to fill those teams. If there isn't enough players which there is not. then all allowing owners to own more teams is going to do is water down the player pool even more than it is now. so seriously what is the point in owning more teams if those teams are going to be just as god awfully bad as CPU teams for the most part? how would it help the game? how would it help stop mediocre leagues the game is plaqued with nowadays?

Just to sum up, those teams are empty NOW. Adding an owner is not going to make them emptierer.

At the Nat Pro level, teams can spare a few of the 6th depth slots and STOPs to fill what part of CPU turned owner rosters are not filled by those owners own dots built for their extra teams and D Leaguers.

9 teams is enough. What we need is more people!

Originally posted by Outlaw Dogs
9 teams is enough. What we need is more people!

or less teams which would be the easiest fix. cut the number of teams back and go to a waiting list again.

Perhaps

But until then....

Originally posted by yello1
Just to sum up, those teams are empty NOW. Adding an owner is not going to make them emptierer.

At the Nat Pro level, teams can spare a few of the 6th depth slots and STOPs to fill what part of CPU turned owner rosters are not filled by those owners own dots built for their extra teams and D Leaguers.

Yes those teams are empty now I agree but what you do not get is that is those teams were owned by humans. they would essentially be recruiting to try to fill those teams right? so that would water down the player pool even more wouldn't it? I mean come on next thing you are going to suggest is that if you buy a team you get to have a supplemental draft like the NFL does or some dumb crap like that to fill your roster from other agents teams.

And just referring to your National Pro example.
1.) it isn't all the other teams responsibility to make cuts to fill those teams. owners plan out their rosters so there is no need in them having to spare a few dots to fill a shitty team for you or any other owner.

Yello1 at the end of the day this is how I see it I own my team or teams and I put alot of work into them. I am not asking GLB to make up new shit to help me be successful. I work to make myself successful by playing the game the way it is. I roll with the new changes and do my best to roll with the punches. you bitch about the customer service, you bitch about the chemistry, you bitch about so many different things that it makes our heads spin. Yet you are still attempting to play the game. you try to tell us you got paid to play online games. well it is no wonder you aren't getting paid anymore.

Originally posted by yello1
Perhaps

But until then....

but until then we get to read all your spewing that doesn't make alot of sense. and then if GLB does fix it then we will just get to read whatever you starting bitching about then.

yello1 just never listen or learns

Originally posted by hatchman
Yes those teams are empty now I agree but what you do not get is that is those teams were owned by humans. they would essentially be recruiting to try to fill those teams right? so that would water down the player pool even more wouldn't it? I mean come on next thing you are going to suggest is that if you buy a team you get to have a supplemental draft like the NFL does or some dumb crap like that to fill your roster from other agents teams.

And just referring to your National Pro example.
1.) it isn't all the other teams responsibility to make cuts to fill those teams. owners plan out their rosters so there is no need in them having to spare a few dots to fill a shitty team for you or any other owner.

Yello1 at the end of the day this is how I see it I own my team or teams and I put alot of work into them. I am not asking GLB to make up new shit to help me be successful. I work to make myself successful by playing the game the way it is. I roll with the new changes and do my best to roll with the punches. you bitch about the customer service, you bitch about the chemistry, you bitch about so many different things that it makes our heads spin. Yet you are still attempting to play the game. you try to tell us you got paid to play online games. well it is no wonder you aren't getting paid anymore.

1) I am not saying those teams have to make cuts. I am saying as a natural flow some players will take a starting gig on a formerly CPU team rather than a STOP or 6th spot on a position depth chart on another team. Does that really dilute that team so much as to offset not having a shell CPU team? I do not think so. I'd rather see 32 teams in a league with 53-54 players than 31 teams with 55 and one team filled with CPUs. Do you REALLY disagree with that? Think about your answer carefully. Thats the difference manning the one CPU team would make to the league and even then ONLY if all of the players were drawn from within the league rather than D leagues and the new owners personal stable. I do not see that as terribly destructive to the game. Indeed to the contrary I see that as helpful. And yes at some lower levels where a whole league is nearly empty the better answer IS contraction. But at the higher levels, no its not. My idea (or some other non CPU answer) is.

2) Not online games. I was making money designing play by mail games. Back before Mr Gore invented his infernal inter-web machine. Way before. Back in my college days. Relevant only to the point that I like to design games, not as any submission of expertise. Hardly relevant to our discussion. But if you think I am bitching to make my teams better you are on crack. By definition what I am bitching about is water under the bridge for my team, its a suggestion on how to fix it for other teams in the future so that GLB doesn't lose customers. The only self interest in that besides the joy of creating and sharing ideas (whee) is that this game I enjoy hangs around longer if it improves, and less if it does not. Your obviously superior game playing skills and personal elite nature and likely lively weekends with tons of nubile young ladies on piles of golden coins, while incredibly impressive I assure you, really doesn't come into the equation. The problems with the game I try to fix are still problems, even if your uber self never shall be bothered by them.

Originally posted by ron2288
yello1 just never listen or learns

The quacking of silly geese and the squealing of timid mice do not sway the minds of men, for the utterances of such noisome nuisances lack meaningful content.

The chattering unsightful observations of the Suggestions Forum are often of even less import.

Only truth will bend my righteous path. When one of you has some to offer, I am always willing to concede its merit.

Theoretically. I am sure its going to happen any day now.

Originally posted by hatchman
but until then we get to read all your spewing that doesn't make alot of sense. and then if GLB does fix it then we will just get to read whatever you starting bitching about then.

Right after I submit my I Told You So post, yes.

yello1 you are dillusional to say it as nicely as possible. first off I am a married man that works a fulltime job and I also own and run my own farm. so your little smart ass crack in trying to portrait that I am some kid locked in his moms basement. thinking I am so much cooler online is utterly wrong. secondly your constant suggestions wouldn't be a bad thing if anyone actually playing the game agreed with your ramblings. you have made a few suggestions that I actually supported. but when you make a suggestion that people actually show the reasoning why it isn't a good idea you just can't drop it. you continually try to reverse the discussion or add some crap from your life into the discussion.

I do not care anything about your life. I do like the idea that you want to help the game get better. I even respect the fact that you are trying to make some suggestions to help the game. but you really need to learn when your suggestions have been defeated and move onto something else. all of your discussions revert back to National Pro. well friend not everyone here has to deal with Nat Pro. we all deal with other leagues and other problems in those leagues.

as far as would I rather see 31 55 man rosters or 32 53 or 54 man rosters. well that is irrelevant in the discussion. lets say for example you had 31 full teams and 1 CPU in a league. what are the odds if players from the other 31 teams went to the CPU team that there would be enough players to make that team actually work.

How many teams actually carry more HB's than they need?
so the CPU team probably won't have any HB's

How many teams carry more WR's than they need?
so the CPU team probably won't have enough WR's

the same can be asked about O-linemen, CB's, SS's, FS's, TE's and QB's.

here is another news flash for you most players are ST's players or Stops for a reason. 1.) they were built to be a ST's unit by a team. having a dedicated ST's unit is a huge boost to the strength of a team. and most people that build stops for teams. would rather keep their player as a stop instead of signing their player to a shitty team and be a starter. the stop builds if built right are alot different than regular players at the same position. and 2) alot of shitty builds get put on ST's to hide that crappy build. so even if those players did leave and sign somewhere else. it wouldn't be a big loss to a team since those players would sign onto a shitty owners team that would use them as starters and then get their butts whipped playing against good teams.

Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
I hope this is a joke.

agreed

Originally posted by Outlaw Dogs
9 teams is enough. What we need is more people!

Less cobwebby teams in the big leagues, the more likely we are to attract more people, don't you think?

Do YOU decide to check out the restaurant with the empty parking lot?

Or the one with the lines?

One of those things has nothing to do with the other.

How are people that don't play GLB seeing CPUs in the "big leagues"?