User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Suggestions > Epic Suggestions > Give my dots a "Tactics Sharing Option" just like the "Attributes Sharing Option"
Page:
 
AC
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by stumanroo
It's about damn time!!!!!!!!!

+100000000000


 
cowtesticles2001
udder pressure
offline
Link
 
what a slap in the face to CT...imma go out to the bar and dance with fat chicks and get their pussies wet...
 
cowtesticles2001
udder pressure
offline
Link
 
it's fucking tactics guys...you already have you builds showing...anyone voting against this is officially retarded....
 
Novus
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by JeffSteele
wow first one I was against. Just having the option makes it quasi-mandatory, and the reason you don't hear about agents being cut for closing their builds from the team is that agents can't do it because the market has forced everyone to have their builds at least open to the GM


I think you should go read this thread here. ( http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4435940 ) Quite a few agents in there who said that they keep the builds closed on their dots and really haven't had many problems from it.

The perception is that owners rampantly bench and rot dots who refuse to open their builds. The reality is far from that.
 
Novus
offline
Link
 
Alrighty, I'm gonna stop keeping track of the in-thread +1's and -1's now that this is up for an official vote. Instead, I'll just keep track of the official votes.

OFFICIAL GLB SUGGESTIONS VOTING SO FAR

Official votes as of Thursday 1/20 11:50pm Eastern Time:
FOR: 395 (81.78%)
AGAINST: 88 (18.22%)
 
Pinkertons
offline
Link
 
Great idea Novus
 
Apache420
offline
Link
 
fantastic idea +1
 
aron26
offline
Link
 
+1 and voted for

Quite a few votes against - given the lack of negative votes actually telling us why in this thread, I'd have to say there must be a fair bit of knee-jerk negative voting going on. Because as far as I can tell this suggestion doesn't really have any holes in it.
 
Link
 
I almost -1 it, but your great OP made me change my mind, especially the "bonus" thread with the cloed buildes.
Good suggestion, great OP.

+1
 
BDIrish79
offline
Link
 
Great idea! It will allow agents to help their coordinators to maximize their gameplans and their player's strengths.
 
fogie55
offline
Link
 
worst idea ever! why not just let agents sign over their dots to the team?
 
GMathiasf
offline
Link
 
so many more pressing needs than to worry about coding stuff like this
 
fogie55
offline
Link
 
this is just "creeping owner-ism" the gradual shift of control from the agents to the team owners... this must be stopped...

The York family doesn't get to tell Frank Gore how hard he is going to play.... what degree of effort he'll give or in what manner... all they can do is sign/not sign him based on his performance.

No matter what anyone says about how this is "voluntary"--it will result in teams not signing players who don't comply... you know it will happen.

I am utterly shocked that 70% of people right now think this is a good idea!
 
Novus
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by fogie55
worst idea ever! why not just let agents sign over their dots to the team?


Do you feel the same way about having the option to have your build open or closed too? 'Cause I guarantee, your build is far more important than your tactics.

I really don't get this... people have no problem letting owners see their builds, but their TACTICS are where they draw the line? That's like saying, "Okay, you can see my junk, but I'm drawing the line at letting you see my shoulder too! My shirt stays on!"
 
dbreeze
offline
Link
 
Good owners will prosper. Bad owners will fail. This is a tool that will help separate them.
In real life, you'd "hide" your tactics choices for how many plays?
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.