Warrior General Games

Originally posted by IggyWH

Is it possible for more shit to come out your mouth? Since when is the almighty Halifax so high on ethical standards? Need I go back and point out every single "exploit" that they have done over the last 2 seasons?



yes you do need to go and do that.

Originally posted by cowtesticles2001
yeah Marblehead really blew it there....your basic AI was fucking tainted...

Nope... we just know how to use basic AI

I love it when ANY team owner tries criticizing another team owner that is playing in the same league as he is.

Originally posted by Iceman16
Originally posted by jrry32

It's not like it matters, back when the screens were uber strong, people including Hali exploited the crap out of them.

Saints are exploiting Drew Brees' ability to pass effectively like craaaaaaaaazy.

Iceman, stop with the stupid analogies. That is real life, the Saints aren't taking advantage of broken mechanics that kept players from going into the backfield to stop the screen and instead had them line up in front of the line of blockers. There wasn't anything wrong with doing it since everyone had the same opportunity but please don't make poor analogies or weak excuses to explain it. Just own up to it.

Ugh, whether or not using the screens/w/e works is an exploit, you're a fucking idiot if you don't use w/e is working. Every season the loser teams in w/e conference my teams have been in bitch no matter what is working. Tell bort to stop switching the sim every yr if he doesn't intend for us to adapt our game plans for maximum efficiency. If you didn't run screens in s11, you weren't very smart. Anyone taking the ethical high road about tactics in a dot ball sim can kiss my ass, and enjoy getting beat like a fucking drum.... I am gonna call w/e plays work, and abuse the hell outta w/e weaknesses I Can find in my opponents O/D, that is the name of this game, whose to say what's an exploit/what works... Maybe bort wants qb's getting sacked, unless you keep a blocking te/hb in vs blitzers, who knows whats going on in that fat guy with the yellow balloons head, he doesn't even know...

Wasn't the screen fixed last season? And which two teams made it to the ship last season?

Huh.

Originally posted by IggyWH

However, I do have a problem with someone now all of a sudden trying to act like they're too good to do broken things and act like the GLB police and call people out on it.

Who's all of a sudden trying to act like they're too good to do broken things?

by the way if you guys want to know what i named that def. play, it is called 43 zoneblitz overload, does exactly what it was suppose to do

Originally posted by kanaan
by the way if you guys want to know what i named that def. play, it is called 43 zoneblitz overload, does exactly what it was suppose to do

If I name a play 4-3 Zone Safe No Blitz and then blitz everyone on the field, does that make it not a blitz? Dude, I mean come on. Just say it, everyone should be smart enough to use them. It's obvious to anyone who watches and has played Football that's not an overload blitz especially when you drop the NT into coverage.(smart move BTW, I've been exploiting the confusion that causes the OL since S11ish, people didn't understand then why I would do it...but since a lot are doing it now, I guess they understand)

Originally posted by jrry32
If I name a play 4-3 Zone Safe No Blitz and then blitz everyone on the field, does that make it not a blitz? Dude, I mean come on. Just say it, everyone should be smart enough to use them. It's obvious to anyone who watches and has played Football that's not an overload blitz especially when you drop the NT into coverage.(smart move BTW, I've been exploiting the confusion that causes the OL since S11ish, people didn't understand then why I would do it...but since a lot are doing it now, I guess they understand)

thats the zone blitz part, you much dont watch much 3-4 zone blitzes, NT are dropped into the middle of the field on many occasions bc the QB doesnt expect anyone to be in that spot, the overload part is having 4 people blitz off one side, any knowledgeable football fan can understand that , meaning 4 people rushing from the weakside and the OT and OG is the only 2 on that side, if that aint an overload than i dont know what is

Originally posted by kanaan
Originally posted by jrry32

If I name a play 4-3 Zone Safe No Blitz and then blitz everyone on the field, does that make it not a blitz? Dude, I mean come on. Just say it, everyone should be smart enough to use them. It's obvious to anyone who watches and has played Football that's not an overload blitz especially when you drop the NT into coverage.(smart move BTW, I've been exploiting the confusion that causes the OL since S11ish, people didn't understand then why I would do it...but since a lot are doing it now, I guess they understand)

thats the zone blitz part, you much dont watch much 3-4 zone blitzes, NT are dropped into the middle of the field on many occasions bc the QB doesnt expect anyone to be in that spot, the overload part is having 4 people blitz off one side, any knowledgeable football fan can understand that , meaning 4 people rushing from the weakside and the OT and OG is the only 2 on that side, if that aint an overload than i dont know what is

Ok but you drop the NT out so that's 3 people rushing vs. OT, OG and C so it's not overload. If you rush the extra player, they also have the RB in the backfield to block. Overload is rushing more than the offense has to block, you are matching what the offense has but the DT/NT dropping back confuses the OL so that the OG and Center don't see the blitzer...I found that out in S11, Bort has never fixed it lol. Overloading would be if you kept the NT in and brought 6 rushers vs. the 5 OLs and the HB and TE went out on the play. NTs IRL aren't dropped that often, on GLB they are good to drop because it really screws with the OL mechanics.

Originally posted by kanaan
by the way if you guys want to know what i named that def. play, it is called 43 zoneblitz overload, does exactly what it was suppose to do

Congrats on designing a play that works.

People can copy, adapt, or ask for a change in the AI if they don't like it but they damn sure can't criticize you for designing and using the play.

The idea is to use whatever tools are at your disposal to help you win. This play is availible to everybody in GLB, not just Stewart.

Originally posted by jrry32
Ok but you drop the NT out so that's 3 people rushing vs. OT, OG and C so it's not overload. If you rush the extra player, they also have the RB in the backfield to block. Overload is rushing more than the offense has to block, you are matching what the offense has but the DT/NT dropping back confuses the OL so that the OG and Center don't see the blitzer...I found that out in S11, Bort has never fixed it lol. Overloading would be if you kept the NT in and brought 6 rushers vs. the 5 OLs and the HB and TE went out on the play. NTs IRL aren't dropped that often, on GLB they are good to drop because it really screws with the OL mechanics.

you can overload one side of the O-line with having the same amount of blitzers as you do O-linemen.
How, you might ask
simple my DT was lined up over the LG, my MLB was lined up over the RT, my RDE was line up outside of the RT, and my ROLB was line up outside of my DE off the line, when you have 4 people blitzing against just the RT and RG( the C is comfused bc of the NT dropping back) that is overloading the left side of the offensive line, i didnt say i brought more blitzers than the O-line can handle, i overloaded one side

you guys actually make me feel good for designing a play that works so well, now when i see it ran i can say i am the one who created it