Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Mad Cow
Winona will play anyone at any time, i love watching Dots, We like to have a game everyday, gives me somthing to do on off days, not to expensive either

I hope you are ready for an ASS raping this Saturday! I get home from vacation and tet is 2-0, we won our tournament game and our scrimmage was already scheduled against you (I had someone watch my account) Life is good

I do wish that we weren't playing a SEAPro team though

same here, but i guess we can really treat this game as a tourny game lol

As soon as we get the week 4 owner's ratings posted I'll send that to USA PL to get the pairings done.

This is going to be an interesting matchup. We should make sure to stipulate no private scrimmages and all scrimmages should be ranked, imo

Originally posted by haole
This is going to be an interesting matchup. We should make sure to stipulate no private scrimmages and all scrimmages should be ranked, imo

this

Since we didn't get the week 4 owner's rankings out, I am just going to combine jmarter and dujoman's polls and get something going.

There is a list of who voted for whom is the SEA Owner's Forum, but that list was never compiled

Originally posted by Texan
Since we didn't get the week 4 owner's rankings out, I am just going to combine jmarter and dujoman's polls and get something going.

works for me, just tell me who we play, and who ever we play, they have to send the scrimm, we are overloaded, we wont be able to send one for a while lol

Originally posted by haole
There is a list of who voted for whom is the SEA Owner's Forum, but that list was never compiled

Why did i get booted from there anyways, i didnt do anything, ill take a PM

Here is what I came up with. I'll give you gives a few hours to post disagreements before I send to USA.

1. Tet
2. PDP (locked into playing OTR)
3. Winona
4. MMJ
5. Mekong
6. CMM
7. Monks
8. ESL
9. Sydney
10. Manila Warlords
11. PPW
12. Sweatshop
13. PDD
14. Pongers

MMJ did beat us, just sayin


but it dont matter to us

oh and PPW should be lower, thay havent changed their AI since game 1, and prob wont take the challenge seriously


my.02

Originally posted by haole
This is going to be an interesting matchup. We should make sure to stipulate no private scrimmages and all scrimmages should be ranked, imo

Definitely.

Originally posted by Texan
Here is what I came up with. I'll give you gives a few hours to post disagreements before I send to USA.

1. Tet
2. PDP (locked into playing OTR)
3. Winona
4. MMJ
5. Mekong
6. CMM
7. Monks
8. ESL
9. Sydney
10. Manila Warlords
11. PPW
12. Sweatshop
13. PDD
14. Pongers

This list looks pretty good to me.

Seedings don't have to be exact, just reflective of team strength in the conferences. You could make a case for most of 1-8 to be moved up or down or re-ranked, but the reality is those are our best 8 teams in the challenge and almost all of them could have a case made as to why they're the best team.

Originally posted by Mad Cow
Why did i get booted from there anyways, i didnt do anything, ill take a PM

I don't have the ability to boot people from there. You'll have to take it up with whoever does.

But if I had to guess, I would say it's your continued inability to distinguish between quality and quantity when it comes to posting. That forum is for serious discussion on league-related matters. There's enough trash-talking, name-calling and thread hijacking in this forum already, and we don't need it there.

I think Snaza went to bat for you in there saying that the forum was "too boring" or something like that and you were just trying to liven it up. But what neither of you (apparently) understand is that forum is SUPPOSED to be "boring" (meaning no thread-jacking, name-calling, etc...) because it's supposed to be easy to navigate and easy to find information.

If I did have the ability to boot people from there, you probably would've been booted at least a day before you actually were. It's not personal; it's just the way it is.

And I have nothing else to say on that subject.

Originally posted by haole
This list looks pretty good to me.

Seedings don't have to be exact, just reflective of team strength in the conferences. You could make a case for most of 1-8 to be moved up or down or re-ranked, but the reality is those are our best 8 teams in the challenge and almost all of them could have a case made as to why they're the best team.

I definitely agree with the exactness comment and the fact that there is a lot of wiggle room. While MC makes some good points, I think it is probably "close enough" since USA's seeding will likely have similar flaws.