User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > North American Pro League > USA Conference > USA PRO I have a question?
Page:
 
Firenze
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Ubasstards
i get the feeling TSE and CV plan these arguments to reduce poasting quality significantly


 
codythetiger
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Ubasstards
i get the feeling TSE and CV plan these arguments to spruce up forum activity


Now that sir, makes you a certified genius
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Ubasstards
i get the feeling TSE and CV plan these arguments to spruce up forum activity

Ooh, a conspiracy theory! So who do you define as TSE? Are you talking about me, or the TSE that I bought this account from in an earlier season?
 
Sik Wit It
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by Ubasstards

i get the feeling TSE and CV plan these arguments to spruce up forum activity

Ooh, a conspiracy theory! So who do you define as TSE? Are you talking about me, or the TSE that I bought this account from in an earlier season?


Ban.
 
Ubasstards
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by Ubasstards

i get the feeling TSE and CV plan these arguments to spruce up forum activity

Ooh, a conspiracy theory! So who do you define as TSE? Are you talking about me, or the TSE that I bought this account from in an earlier season?


CV, i knew it was you!
Edited by Ubasstards on Jul 25, 2009 19:10:05
 
kurieg
offline
Link
 
CV and TSE have completely different rambling posting styles.
 
coachviking
offline
Link
 
Nah...we don't plan them BUT I don't think he really hates me
 
Link
 
So what was the final count of people that believe you over me about the Manning situation? Great idea for a thread indeed.
 
mocfam10
offline
Link
 
`--<_


I kicked over my carecup.
Edited by mocfam10 on Jul 27, 2009 13:33:25
 
Link
 
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
I said no intelligent person or logical person. Those that would agree with you are either despicable people, ignorant people, people who make false assumptions, people who don't know how to research facts, and people who use an illogical method to come to their conclusions. It is IMPOSSIBLE for you to dispute that I have told the truth 100% every step of the way. I've never lied on GLB at any point to anybody to give anybody material to call me out on a lie. That's because I'm smarter than you and would never put myself in a position where somebody could bust me. It's pretty easy to do by playing things straight and having an unbreakable and uncompromisable commitment to honesty. You should try it some day, people might not consider you to be a POS in the future and that might get you somewhere in life.


So it comes out, TSE considers himself a vulcan.

CV 4 LIFE!
 
Link
 
Well Vulcans are fictional, and tbh I consider a lot of Vulcans from Star Trek to actually exhibit poor logic that is not consistent with what they are supposed to represent. I've seen every episode of TNG and Voyager and Enterprise, but not the original Star Trek, cause Spock in that series to me was a logical nincompoop and I couldn't stand some of the decisions he made or things he said. It's logically incoherent to me way too often. Thus, I'm not sure what a Vulcan technically is because of the conflicting evidence surrounding the true validity of their logic.
 
Sik Wit It
offline
Link
 
Dude...that's racist.
 
Sik Wit It
offline
Link
 
http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/4812/2ikchy.gif

Pic related.
 
Link
 
I swear I'm not racist against Vulcans, lol. And I really like Spock's character in theory, it's just that I consider the writers to have done a piss poor job at times that they really made Spock look bad in my eyes with their crappy writing on a few occasions. They didn't mess up too often, but more than once was enough and inexcusable for me.
 
coachviking
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Well Vulcans are fictional, and tbh I consider a lot of Vulcans from Star Trek to actually exhibit poor logic that is not consistent with what they are supposed to represent. I've seen every episode of TNG and Voyager and Enterprise, but not the original Star Trek, cause Spock in that series to me was a logical nincompoop and I couldn't stand some of the decisions he made or things he said. It's logically incoherent to me way too often. Thus, I'm not sure what a Vulcan technically is because of the conflicting evidence surrounding the true validity of their logic.


This thread has now officially went to hell
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.