Originally posted by Ubasstards i get the feeling TSE and CV plan these arguments to spruce up forum activity Ooh, a conspiracy theory! So who do you define as TSE? Are you talking about me, or the TSE that I bought this account from in an earlier season?
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert Originally posted by Ubasstards
i get the feeling TSE and CV plan these arguments to spruce up forum activity Ooh, a conspiracy theory! So who do you define as TSE? Are you talking about me, or the TSE that I bought this account from in an earlier season?
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert Originally posted by Ubasstards
i get the feeling TSE and CV plan these arguments to spruce up forum activity Ooh, a conspiracy theory! So who do you define as TSE? Are you talking about me, or the TSE that I bought this account from in an earlier season?
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert I said no intelligent person or logical person. Those that would agree with you are either despicable people, ignorant people, people who make false assumptions, people who don't know how to research facts, and people who use an illogical method to come to their conclusions. It is IMPOSSIBLE for you to dispute that I have told the truth 100% every step of the way. I've never lied on GLB at any point to anybody to give anybody material to call me out on a lie. That's because I'm smarter than you and would never put myself in a position where somebody could bust me. It's pretty easy to do by playing things straight and having an unbreakable and uncompromisable commitment to honesty. You should try it some day, people might not consider you to be a POS in the future and that might get you somewhere in life.
Well Vulcans are fictional, and tbh I consider a lot of Vulcans from Star Trek to actually exhibit poor logic that is not consistent with what they are supposed to represent. I've seen every episode of TNG and Voyager and Enterprise, but not the original Star Trek, cause Spock in that series to me was a logical nincompoop and I couldn't stand some of the decisions he made or things he said. It's logically incoherent to me way too often. Thus, I'm not sure what a Vulcan technically is because of the conflicting evidence surrounding the true validity of their logic.
I swear I'm not racist against Vulcans, lol. And I really like Spock's character in theory, it's just that I consider the writers to have done a piss poor job at times that they really made Spock look bad in my eyes with their crappy writing on a few occasions. They didn't mess up too often, but more than once was enough and inexcusable for me.
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert Well Vulcans are fictional, and tbh I consider a lot of Vulcans from Star Trek to actually exhibit poor logic that is not consistent with what they are supposed to represent. I've seen every episode of TNG and Voyager and Enterprise, but not the original Star Trek, cause Spock in that series to me was a logical nincompoop and I couldn't stand some of the decisions he made or things he said. It's logically incoherent to me way too often. Thus, I'm not sure what a Vulcan technically is because of the conflicting evidence surrounding the true validity of their logic.