Warrior General Games

Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by canes30

Originally posted by jrry32




Yes, we at OTR feel quite good about it considering we came into the playoffs as a 5 seed and beat the Gurupies and Wolfpack...I don't see you in USA Pro.


I personally don't like moving up without winning at least a conference championship.

I also don't understand why you try to justify you guys losing the conference game and feeling "quite good" about it.

Are you still butt hurt about losing the League Championship game to us?

Because I was with OTR then...I personally don't like it either but if you get picked nothing you can do. We feel good about being in USA Pro and beating those 2 teams, of course no one is going to be happy with losing but I don't know why I am wasting my time here because it's obvious you are just trolling.

I was in here posting about a WR and the owner of Halifax said he wasn't a good build and that CPL didn't try against the Yeti's.....not exactly trolling.

I do find it funny the attitude you guys have on your team. You, Gart and JTkooley all sound the same. I'm assuming we all have a lot in common, but still you guys are damn annoying.

Originally posted by BroncosBeTheBest
I'm just saying that if a build is really good then it should be able to perform no matter what system someone may use. If you don't perform in at least 75% of the systems you're in then you don't have a great build

You just contrasted your point. "Meh I don't think you can really judge a build based solely off of their attributes. Pogo may have an average build iyo but it may be a great build in a certain offensive system. IMO a build can only be good if it is used right."

In a CERTAIN offensive system. Seems contradictory to your latest post imo

Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by BroncosBeTheBest

I'm just saying that if a build is really good then it should be able to perform no matter what system someone may use. If you don't perform in at least 75% of the systems you're in then you don't have a great build

You just contrasted your point. "Meh I don't think you can really judge a build based solely off of their attributes. Pogo may have an average build iyo but it may be a great build in a certain offensive system. IMO a build can only be good if it is used right."

In a CERTAIN offensive system. Seems contradictory to your latest post imo

Heh I contradict myself a lot as I struggled typing out what I actually want to say. I'm trying to say that if you have a good build you should do well no matter what system you are in. Unless of course you play special teams and don't have enough stamina to do both.

Originally posted by canes30
Originally posted by jrry32

Originally posted by canes30


Originally posted by jrry32





Yes, we at OTR feel quite good about it considering we came into the playoffs as a 5 seed and beat the Gurupies and Wolfpack...I don't see you in USA Pro.


I personally don't like moving up without winning at least a conference championship.

I also don't understand why you try to justify you guys losing the conference game and feeling "quite good" about it.

Are you still butt hurt about losing the League Championship game to us?

Because I was with OTR then...I personally don't like it either but if you get picked nothing you can do. We feel good about being in USA Pro and beating those 2 teams, of course no one is going to be happy with losing but I don't know why I am wasting my time here because it's obvious you are just trolling.

I was in here posting about a WR and the owner of Halifax said he wasn't a good build and that CPL didn't try against the Yeti's.....not exactly trolling.

I do find it funny the attitude you guys have on your team. You, Gart and JTkooley all sound the same. I'm assuming we all have a lot in common, but still you guys are damn annoying.

On my team? You don't know any of the guys on my team and if you did, you'd probably like them. The trolling part is taking all the shots at OTR and Tooley. BTW everyone knows Eggleston is good but like I said earlier, you are wasting your time arguing this as this really isn't a serious list.

Originally posted by BroncosBeTheBest
Originally posted by jrry32

Originally posted by BroncosBeTheBest


I'm just saying that if a build is really good then it should be able to perform no matter what system someone may use. If you don't perform in at least 75% of the systems you're in then you don't have a great build

You just contrasted your point. "Meh I don't think you can really judge a build based solely off of their attributes. Pogo may have an average build iyo but it may be a great build in a certain offensive system. IMO a build can only be good if it is used right."

In a CERTAIN offensive system. Seems contradictory to your latest post imo

Heh I contradict myself a lot as I struggled typing out what I actually want to say. I'm trying to say that if you have a good build you should do well no matter what system you are in. Unless of course you play special teams and don't have enough stamina to do both.

Unless Gart doesn't understand how amazing you are.

Also, Jrry, 7/15 is pretty shitty in league championship games.

* troll leaves*

EDIT: so you know there's sarcasm

Actually Barron Marsh got his season 4 and 5 killed by special teams

IMO top 10 WR means top 10 at least over the last 3 seasons.

It's hard to base it on a seasonal basis because gutted teams and such switch around.

Also, every WR had a good season this year with the fucked up CB coverage.

Originally posted by canes30
Also, Jrry, 7/15 is pretty shitty in league championship games.

* troll leaves*

If I wasn't so lazy, I could be 8/15...so take that.

Gotta put the best WR in all WE out there to at least be considered in the discussion:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=278637&playoffs=0
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player_awards.pl?player_id=278637

These lists are kind of ridiculous when any single person at all that's making them has experienced the abilities of maybe 10% of all viable options at best.

Originally posted by jrry32
Originally posted by canes30

Also, Jrry, 7/15 is pretty shitty in league championship games.

* troll leaves*

If I wasn't so lazy, I could be 8/15...so take that.

k good, you knew there was sarcasm before I posted......I guess I don't hate you that much

Originally posted by secondeye
These lists are kind of ridiculous when any single person at all that's making them has experienced the abilities of maybe 10% of all viable options at best.

Pretty sure he's experienced at least 80% of the people on this list

I dont see how you say who has the best WR in GLB because your comparing stats that can bloated against weak teams and cpu teams. The way stats are gathered for the positions in GLB really need to addressed when Bort ever gets the time. You need to take into consideration how they did against the better defense in the league and how well they performed in clutch situations. Example did they make that critical 3rd down catch to keep the drive alive if so how many did they make? How about game winning TDs? Pivotal blocks that changed the course of the game? All of these should be taken into consideration for any position not just WR and until they are these are just bloated stats that really dont mean diddly. What about WR that are really good with great builds, but they are unselfish and play for teams that run the ball more than they pass? These WR have great builds but they would rather play and help a team rather than pad their stats against weak opponents, but if called on these guys perform excellently they just dont get the high stats as other WRs do.