Originally posted by j0shle0
I think it takes into account every player on your team. We cut some CPU players, and our ratings went up. Keeping low level CPU players on your team is a good way to sandbag your ratings.
I think your right, and I have proof! lol
I just added another lvl 11 RB to my squad today, and immediately our running went from 21 to 24.
BUUUT....I have a lvl 10 QB with a human LVL 6 backup. The Steel have a lvl 5 qb starter, and a lvl 6 cpu backup. Yet we both have 24 passing on the matchup.
Also, how the HELL do I get my recieving stat off of 18 lol. I have a lvl 9, two lvl 7's and two lvl 6's. All Human. To me this doesnt represent a horrible receiving corp. The Steel have 2 lvl 5's, a lvl 1 and a CPU lvl 6, and they also have an 18.
It just makes very little sense to me how they rate our squads. If any of you have insight into this, lemme know.
I think it takes into account every player on your team. We cut some CPU players, and our ratings went up. Keeping low level CPU players on your team is a good way to sandbag your ratings.
I think your right, and I have proof! lol
I just added another lvl 11 RB to my squad today, and immediately our running went from 21 to 24.
BUUUT....I have a lvl 10 QB with a human LVL 6 backup. The Steel have a lvl 5 qb starter, and a lvl 6 cpu backup. Yet we both have 24 passing on the matchup.
Also, how the HELL do I get my recieving stat off of 18 lol. I have a lvl 9, two lvl 7's and two lvl 6's. All Human. To me this doesnt represent a horrible receiving corp. The Steel have 2 lvl 5's, a lvl 1 and a CPU lvl 6, and they also have an 18.
It just makes very little sense to me how they rate our squads. If any of you have insight into this, lemme know.





Why not start off with a Cleveland team, it seems only fitting 























