Warrior General Games

Originally posted by coachingubigr
wise should help us settle on cheating scandal name

Itstaxseasongate has my vote.

FFS this is still going? Here is the name for you...
Lockthisbullshitnowgate.

Originally posted by Greywolfmeb
FFS this is still going? Here is the name for you...
Lockthisbullshitnowgate.



Why lock? If people choose to keep bumping the thread, that's their choice.

At this point I feel I've adequately defended the honor of those persecuted by baseless accusations from sore losers, so no more activity is fine by me.

But people in GLB with 99% inactive forums have this ridiculous "get off my lawn" vibe. If you don't want to participate in a thread then don't reply, it is counterintuitive to reply and bump a thread complaining that others choose to communicate.

Originally posted by coachingubigr
confirmed peejk multi

bump for attention

https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=93655DVS owns wise thread now we can close it

you must play TSW first.

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
So... Last season I OC'd a team in AAA (Harbor Hawks). We won the Pro Tourney and finished the regular season undefeated with the #1 offense in AAA. In rd2 of the playoffs the Hawks played the other team I OC (TSW). I did not make any adjustment for either side specifically for this game/opponent.

TSW won in a 28-25 upset (shout out to SN for a nice job on D for TSW!). Hawks has 100 more offensive yards but less points. https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=92620

Fast forward a couple weeks and I was unceremoniously fired on day1 as the Hawks OC, which I was thinking was perhaps a misunderstanding, but it turns out that I'm being accused of after 20 years of playing dotball to have chosen this moment to begin colluding and game throwing (in AAA in a game between 2 teams that have already earned Pro promotion).

So community, what do we think? Did I intentionally throw the game to make the Hawks lose and TSW win? Did I give Hawks a (bad AI) and give TSW a (good AI)?

My stance is of course that Brewnoe is a crazy asshole of a person for a lot of reasons, one of which being he watched a AAA playoff game 12 times.


Originally posted by Brewnoe

The TSW game was either collusion, or extreme naivety. Go watch the game. I have a dozen times.

See how Seattle put out a defense no DC in their right mind would use, unless they knew exactly what was coming. 7 dots on one side, 4 on the other. And that's being generous as the off side safety was sprinting towards play side off the snap on the first fucking tick, in a immediate zone across the entire damn field. Leaving just the NT/DT, DE on that side, and a single cover CB v WR. 8 vs 3. NO one does that, no one. That's not Seattle being some kind of genius, that's having the other team's playbook, at your finger tips - where the O here was a clone of the one you ran on the same team. Though I'm guessing the one on TSW actually had some 3rd / 4th quarter time management logic, score based calling, unlike the bare bones preset looking one on Hawks?

So no, I don't buy for a fucking second that the loss was legit. Either Seattle spied on your tactics, and saw you made no changes at all on TSW, and made the HUGE gamble that you were doing the same thing on Hawks too. Or you told them you were making no changes for either team. And didn't make the same communication here. And that would be collusion.

As far as the rest of it? I don't like the "even if I had put any effort in, wouldn't have mattered" vibe. Yes there is randomness in dotball. But letting opposing DCs clamp down and hoping auto-adjust finds a hole for you? Seems lazy, yes. That is the word I would use. If you were self-scouting, why was the SB Big counter sweep still getting called? It averaged 2.1 yards for the season (excluding CPU games), and had almost a dozen TFLs? Or the scatFB being a 100% passing tell? Or the Strong I having basically one play out of the formation, letting DCs TEE off on it.

So TL;DR - yes, I told G I'd pull my dots when their contract was done, if you were back as OC. Because I have zero faith you would put any effort in. And yes, your OAI and packages were deleted by me, before G removed you. Back on Day -3. Not Day 1.

I'm in the middle of tax season, as a tax accountant IRL. I'm still making the time to log in, at midnight ...



Having been a teammate for many seasons I can definitively say no, wise doesn’t cheat. He commonly produces more offense than other OCs, but he has a weakness and the good DCs see it.

Originally posted by Kenshinzen


you must play TSW first.

kicked their ass as well. snowcats are way better

Originally posted by Dr. E
Having been a teammate for many seasons I can definitively say no, wise doesn’t cheat. He commonly produces more offense than other OCs, but he has a weakness and the good DCs see it.

Does it rhyme with Tint, Dint, Rint, Lint, Sint, Went?

Or similar to conception, reception



I’m implying Interception, Wise throws interceptions.

Originally posted by POOPERDOG7
https://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/game.pl?game_id=93655DVS owns wise thread now we can close it

Literally 2 different teams compared to the topic.

And even if Hawks or TSW win some future game, it does nothing regarding the retarded accusations of cheating.

TSW is 4-1 in Pro at the moment while Hawks are 2-3. The entire braindead thought process that TSW has to cheat to beat Hawks, makes zero sense.

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
. The entire braindead thought process that TSW has to cheat to beat Hawks, makes zero sense.

So true.

Originally posted by POOPERDOG7
kicked their ass as well. snowcats are way better


no one cares about lolscrims, you play 5 of them every day. You don't have a chance against them in a regular game.

Originally posted by WiSeIVIaN
Literally 2 different teams compared to the topic.

And even if Hawks or TSW win some future game, it does nothing regarding the retarded accusations of cheating.

TSW is 4-1 in Pro at the moment while Hawks are 2-3. The entire braindead thought process that TSW has to cheat to beat Hawks, makes zero sense.

The "R" word is not acceptable; your Mom would be disappointed.

Originally posted by Duff550
The "R" word is not acceptable; your Mom would be disappointed.

True. I suggest we make it an unofficial GLB rule to substitute the word Amish for the R word.

That way they'll never see it, because they're not allowed on the Internet.

The only way they'd find out is if someone told them, which would make the snitch the A-hole for causing distress for no reason whatsoever.

As an added perk, the Amish wouldn't be allowed to get mad about it, even if they did hear about it, and would more than likely just "turn the other cheek" anyway.