Warrior General Games

Originally posted by dahman32
So basically it costs the same?

No it costs more

Originally posted by vinman
No it costs more

So version 1 still needs repairs and the cure is to start workin on a more expensive version 2?
Sounds about right

The catch up SP option is easily the best idea in GLB 2.

Originally posted by vinman
No it costs more

The math that was done comparing GLB1 vs GLB2 costs on a 'per game' basis is actually pretty interesting. Not looking too much into it, appears that current 300 flex dot equivalents will actually be cheaper on a flex lost comparison with 200 about the same and 100 being more expensive.

Originally posted by SikoraP13 DTD
Thanks for the clarification based on player career. Re-running the #s:
(Calculations Below)

FP Lost/Game Played
Position FP.............OLD...........NEW
300.........................14.06...........10.23
200.........................9.38...........8.63
100.........................4.69...........7.05


300 Flex Positions Cost: -37%
200 Flex Positions Cost: -9%
100 Flex Positions Cost: +50%



Old
300 FLEX
Flex spent: 9000
Flex returned: 6300
Net Flex lost=2700
Total Regular Season Games played (12 seasons*16 games):192 games
Flex lost/game played: 14.06 FP/game

200 FLEX
Flex spent: 6000
Flex returned: 4200
Net Flex lost=1800
Total Regular Season Games played (12 seasons*16 games):192 games
Flex lost/game played: 9.38 FP/game

100 FLEX
Flex spent: 3000
Flex returned: 2100
Net Flex lost=900
Total Regular Season Games played (12 seasons*16 games):192 games
Flex lost/game played: 4.69 FP/game


New System
300 FLEX
Flex Spent: 2250 flex + cost of AP boost (we'll neglect the cost as it'll prove a best case scenario)
Flex Returned:675 flex
Net Flex Lost: 1575
Total Regular Season Games Played(22*7 seasons): 154
Flex Lost/Game:10.23 FP/Game

200 FLEX
Flex Spent: 1900 flex + cost of AP boost (we'll neglect the cost as it'll prove a best case scenario)
Flex Returned:570 flex
Net Flex Lost: 1330
Total Regular Season Games Played(22*7 seasons): 154
Flex Lost/Game:8.63 FP/Game

100 FLEX
Flex spent: 1550
Flex returned: 465
Net Flex lost=1085
Total Regular Season Games Played(22*7 seasons): 154
Flex lost/game played: 7.05 FP/game



based on assumptions*

Are WRs still overpriced in GLB2?

Originally posted by TrevJo
Are WRs still overpriced in GLB2?

WRs are no longer in the 'glamour' equivalent tier. The glamour tier is QB/HB/LB

Originally posted by InRomoWeTrust
WRs are no longer in the 'glamour' equivalent tier. The glamour tier is QB/HB/LB

LB.

The only reason that people will make 150 flex LBers is because it will allow them to quickly unlock a Superstar QB or HB.

Originally posted by Time Trial
LB.

The only reason that people will make 150 flex LBers is because it will allow them to quickly unlock a Superstar QB or HB.

Yeah LB is (or was) a glamour position in GLB1 because of the DPC. Take that away & they are just LBs.

Whatev...but doesnt make sense to me unless there are plans to have a DPC in GLB2.

Originally posted by Time Trial
LB.

The only reason that people will make 150 flex LBers is because it will allow them to quickly unlock a Superstar QB or HB.

dunno about that. my LB has 10 sacks on the season w/o even trying. i've no doubt i could take down those DEs ahead of him