I think Dr. E really needs to take a step back and question why he hasn't been able to achieve anything above regional pro. Then he should consider whether he should accept advice from WL winning agents who are WL dot creating factories. Maybe there is a reason for the huge discrepancy in success.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Any two AEQ builders out there?
Dr. E
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
And I did use the attributes you said your OT would end up with. It's a terrible, terrible build. Just god awful. If you would stop being stubborn and listen to people who are trying to educate you, you would end up with better players. Instead you're doing what you always do, which is to pretend that you know what you're talking about when you don't have the first clue.
What I see is a guys so sure of himself that he is ready to insult another before a build can even finish to be tested. That you have made the decision the thread is mean to show everyone I'm a brilliant builder when it's stated it was meant to find others building like dots.
So, try to relax. Sit back and watch. Should you see us losing, have a laugh, and when we win, tell yourself it's luck, that at the next level we will lose.
And I did use the attributes you said your OT would end up with. It's a terrible, terrible build. Just god awful. If you would stop being stubborn and listen to people who are trying to educate you, you would end up with better players. Instead you're doing what you always do, which is to pretend that you know what you're talking about when you don't have the first clue.
What I see is a guys so sure of himself that he is ready to insult another before a build can even finish to be tested. That you have made the decision the thread is mean to show everyone I'm a brilliant builder when it's stated it was meant to find others building like dots.
So, try to relax. Sit back and watch. Should you see us losing, have a laugh, and when we win, tell yourself it's luck, that at the next level we will lose.
Dr. E
offline
offline
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
I think Dr. E really needs to take a step back and question why he hasn't been able to achieve anything above regional pro. Then he should consider whether he should accept advice from WL winning agents who are WL dot creating factories. Maybe there is a reason for the huge discrepancy in success.
Achieve. Well, guess you need to define what is achieve for an answer. If it's make pro, already did that, but you missed it. If it's make playoffs in pro, did that. Be asked to be a tester, did that. If it's make WL, not done that, beat a few WL teams, had fair games in most match ups against them, but discovered too many builds on the team were truly average, that the Agents who had been inactive for three seasons made it a bit tougher to win and the lack of avoid fake equipment killed us. And most important of all, if you can't score in the WL, you are going to end up in a morale spiral, we all know where that ends up.
I think Dr. E really needs to take a step back and question why he hasn't been able to achieve anything above regional pro. Then he should consider whether he should accept advice from WL winning agents who are WL dot creating factories. Maybe there is a reason for the huge discrepancy in success.
Achieve. Well, guess you need to define what is achieve for an answer. If it's make pro, already did that, but you missed it. If it's make playoffs in pro, did that. Be asked to be a tester, did that. If it's make WL, not done that, beat a few WL teams, had fair games in most match ups against them, but discovered too many builds on the team were truly average, that the Agents who had been inactive for three seasons made it a bit tougher to win and the lack of avoid fake equipment killed us. And most important of all, if you can't score in the WL, you are going to end up in a morale spiral, we all know where that ends up.
Dr. E
offline
offline
Originally posted by StudMuffin
anyone here think they can DC a full team of 2 AEQ dots?
I"m doing so now. Well, we have a few being build the classic way, but it would be safe to say 45 of them are 2AEQ builds.
anyone here think they can DC a full team of 2 AEQ dots?
I"m doing so now. Well, we have a few being build the classic way, but it would be safe to say 45 of them are 2AEQ builds.
Originally posted by Dr. E
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
I think Dr. E really needs to take a step back and question why he hasn't been able to achieve anything above regional pro. Then he should consider whether he should accept advice from WL winning agents who are WL dot creating factories. Maybe there is a reason for the huge discrepancy in success.
Achieve. Well, guess you need to define what is achieve for an answer. If it's make pro, already did that, but you missed it. If it's make playoffs in pro, did that. Be asked to be a tester, did that. If it's make WL, not done that, beat a few WL teams, had fair games in most match ups against them, but discovered too many builds on the team were truly average, that the Agents who had been inactive for three seasons made it a bit tougher to win and the lack of avoid fake equipment killed us. And most important of all, if you can't score in the WL, you are going to end up in a morale spiral, we all know where that ends up.
I wish I I could make the playoffs in Pro
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
I think Dr. E really needs to take a step back and question why he hasn't been able to achieve anything above regional pro. Then he should consider whether he should accept advice from WL winning agents who are WL dot creating factories. Maybe there is a reason for the huge discrepancy in success.
Achieve. Well, guess you need to define what is achieve for an answer. If it's make pro, already did that, but you missed it. If it's make playoffs in pro, did that. Be asked to be a tester, did that. If it's make WL, not done that, beat a few WL teams, had fair games in most match ups against them, but discovered too many builds on the team were truly average, that the Agents who had been inactive for three seasons made it a bit tougher to win and the lack of avoid fake equipment killed us. And most important of all, if you can't score in the WL, you are going to end up in a morale spiral, we all know where that ends up.
I wish I I could make the playoffs in Pro
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by StudMuffin
anyone here think they can DC a full team of 2 AEQ dots?
Originally posted by Dr. E
the lack of avoid fake equipment killed us.
hmm...im assuming all 2 AEQ builds in secondary are going to be 1 MT, 1 PD, 1 AF CEQ then?
anyone here think they can DC a full team of 2 AEQ dots?
Originally posted by Dr. E
the lack of avoid fake equipment killed us.
hmm...im assuming all 2 AEQ builds in secondary are going to be 1 MT, 1 PD, 1 AF CEQ then?
Dr. E
offline
offline
Originally posted by lemdog
I wish I I could make the playoffs in Pro
Is that your mark of "achievement" ?
I wish I I could make the playoffs in Pro
Is that your mark of "achievement" ?
Disastermaster
offline
offline
Originally posted by lemdog
I wish I I could make the playoffs in Pro
I did make the playoffs in Pro last season. It was a great exierence and I never thought I could get this done with my 4 AEQ dots.
I wish I I could make the playoffs in Pro
I did make the playoffs in Pro last season. It was a great exierence and I never thought I could get this done with my 4 AEQ dots.
Dr. E
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
hmm...im assuming all 2 AEQ builds in secondary are going to be 1 MT, 1 PD, 1 AF CEQ then?
Easy assumption. But you are listing 3 plus a ceq, one of those three has to be a CEQ. I'm of the opinion that percent equipment is in most instances the only thing worth having. SAs might grant some small increase, but in most instances, taking the concerned attributes higher is a better option. There are of course a few exceptions and in any good VA, SA & equipment stack, there are probably three good choices of SAs.
hmm...im assuming all 2 AEQ builds in secondary are going to be 1 MT, 1 PD, 1 AF CEQ then?
Easy assumption. But you are listing 3 plus a ceq, one of those three has to be a CEQ. I'm of the opinion that percent equipment is in most instances the only thing worth having. SAs might grant some small increase, but in most instances, taking the concerned attributes higher is a better option. There are of course a few exceptions and in any good VA, SA & equipment stack, there are probably three good choices of SAs.
Originally posted by bhall43
hmm...im assuming all 2 AEQ builds in secondary are going to be 1 MT, 1 PD, 1 AF CEQ then?
pretty much......
hmm...im assuming all 2 AEQ builds in secondary are going to be 1 MT, 1 PD, 1 AF CEQ then?
pretty much......
bhall43
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dr. E
Easy assumption. But you are listing 3 plus a ceq, one of those three has to be a CEQ. I'm of the opinion that percent equipment is in most instances the only thing worth having. SAs might grant some small increase, but in most instances, taking the concerned attributes higher is a better option. There are of course a few exceptions and in any good VA, SA & equipment stack, there are probably three good choices of SAs.
I listed 3 total. 2 AEQ's and a CEQ.
Easy assumption. But you are listing 3 plus a ceq, one of those three has to be a CEQ. I'm of the opinion that percent equipment is in most instances the only thing worth having. SAs might grant some small increase, but in most instances, taking the concerned attributes higher is a better option. There are of course a few exceptions and in any good VA, SA & equipment stack, there are probably three good choices of SAs.
I listed 3 total. 2 AEQ's and a CEQ.
MadCow420
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dr. E
Originally posted by bhall43
hmm...im assuming all 2 AEQ builds in secondary are going to be 1 MT, 1 PD, 1 AF CEQ then?
Easy assumption. But you are listing 3 plus a ceq, one of those three has to be a CEQ. I'm of the opinion that percent equipment is in most instances the only thing worth having. SAs might grant some small increase, but in most instances, taking the concerned attributes higher is a better option. There are of course a few exceptions and in any good VA, SA & equipment stack, there are probably three good choices of SAs.
do you understand everything you write? why are people who are good at the game arguing with you?
Originally posted by bhall43
hmm...im assuming all 2 AEQ builds in secondary are going to be 1 MT, 1 PD, 1 AF CEQ then?
Easy assumption. But you are listing 3 plus a ceq, one of those three has to be a CEQ. I'm of the opinion that percent equipment is in most instances the only thing worth having. SAs might grant some small increase, but in most instances, taking the concerned attributes higher is a better option. There are of course a few exceptions and in any good VA, SA & equipment stack, there are probably three good choices of SAs.
do you understand everything you write? why are people who are good at the game arguing with you?
Dr. E
offline
offline
Originally posted by O' HappyCow
do you understand everything you write? why are people who are good at the game arguing with you?
Well, I'm not sure. See my first post and ask yourself, why? Of course not all are arguing. Some are actually discussing, some have contributed in the manner the post was intended. As for the others, I'm open to discussion, I'm old enough I can handle comments from people who don't agree with me.
do you understand everything you write? why are people who are good at the game arguing with you?
Well, I'm not sure. See my first post and ask yourself, why? Of course not all are arguing. Some are actually discussing, some have contributed in the manner the post was intended. As for the others, I'm open to discussion, I'm old enough I can handle comments from people who don't agree with me.
Timetoshine-Metta
offline
offline
Originally posted by StudMuffin
anyone here think they can DC a full team of 2 AEQ dots?
no
anyone here think they can DC a full team of 2 AEQ dots?
no
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
