Warrior General Games

Originally posted by jdbolick
Granted, racy avatars don't have anywhere near the same value as CPL posts did

Yep

Originally posted by
but it's the same philosophy behind it.

Nope.

Racy avatars generate zero forum activity. The only purpose they serve is showing who is going through puberty and who has a complete dearth of personality.

While we are on the subject of avatars, you really need to go back to House, DB.

But Andy personifies my feelings towards GLB perfectly.

But he doesn't really capture your essence.

Plus people take me way too serious when I'm sporting House.

It's much more funny when people get furious because they think I am whimsically trolling.

Originally posted by jdbolick

Racy avatars have nothing whatsoever to do with moderators being comically unaware of the rules, using bias when moderating, or applying the rules with dizzying inconsistency.

In the context of this thread it does. Some avatars that slid because of inconsistent moderation or lack of whatever, no longer seem to be. Or, this thread wouldn't be here. By the way, not all racy avatars are being banned, just ones that fall outside the rules. Rules have been the same. There's been a push for more consistency by the user base. Which Pallow is working on with the Moderating team. It seems it's affecting areas the user base didn't want it do.

Short version: Be careful what you ask for.

I'm also fairly certain that whatever Phil's avatar is is racy.

Originally posted by BadgerPhil
Which Pallow is working with the Moderating team.

#4 I think

Originally posted by Deathblade
I'm also fairly certain that whatever Phil's avatar is is racy.

It appears to be a woman getting fingered.

I just see shadows, skin, and a hand.

I'm all kinds of hard right now.

Originally posted by Deathblade
Racy avatars generate zero forum activity.
Actually wasn't there a 100+ page thread in SLAP about them once upon a time? And in actuality there were far more demonstrable negatives from CPL posts than from racy avatars. Plenty of people got butthurt over that, which prompted Pallow's Thunderdome nonsense before they killed the community entirely.

Originally posted by jdbolick
Actually wasn't there a 100+ page thread in SLAP about them once upon a time? And in actuality there were far more demonstrable negatives from CPL posts than from racy avatars. Plenty of people got butthurt over that, which prompted Pallow's Thunderdome nonsense before they killed the community entirely.

CPL also gave people reason to play.

Bouncing boobs do not.

Originally posted by Deathblade
Nope.

Racy avatars generate zero forum activity. The only purpose they serve is showing who is going through puberty and who has a complete dearth of personality.

Ha!

Originally posted by Deathblade
I'm also fairly certain that whatever Phil's avatar is is racy.

My 3 month old daughter, at the time, telling you all what she thinks of all the T&A talk.

Originally posted by BadgerPhil
My 3 month old daughter, at the time, telling you all what she thinks of all the T&A talk.


Oh, well this just became all kinds of awkward.

Originally posted by BadgerPhil
In the context of this thread it does. Some avatars that slid because of inconsistent moderation or lack of whatever, no longer seem to be.
You're embarrassing yourself by trying to equate two things that are in no way related, simply because you desperately want to be clever. Clearly this thread isn't about some people getting away with avatars while others don't, it's about the absurdity of the rule regardless of its application.

Originally posted by
There's been a push for more consistency by the user base. Which Pallow is working on with the Moderating team.
The notion of Pallow "working" is the funniest comment of the thread thus far.