Warrior General Games

Originally posted by stevent37
I wasn't cherry picking. Since we used me as an example I used one of my players and the guy that will line up opposite him

That's the definition of cherry picking. Hypothetically speaking, if the other team had a 1150 or 1200 PV poorly built DT, you wouldn't be calling out that dot for being omg level 79

Seriously bro, you're embarrassing yourself.

now ur team can rot in regional pro.

but i agree something had to be done. bout time

LOCK IT UP, WE GOT A FIX!!!

lol not really

Originally posted by JDragon
if the other team had a 1150 or 1200 PV poorly built DT, you wouldn't be calling out that dot for being omg level 79

Yes I would. It was/is a bad setup that needs to be changed. I will repeat myself again, since u don't get it:

Originally posted by
No one should have to overcome training, alg and va differences. NFL teams don't play college teams.I don't expect my 240 day old players to get to play 200 day old players, nor would I want that. It wouldn't be fun.

Everyone on a human team in my conference is a booster and thus a paying customer. Paying customers expect things to be equal not to have to compete at a handicap "just because".

You, in this thread have admitted there are training and alg advantages Read above. again till you get it then again till you get it again. "No one" means no one, not just me. "Paying customers" means everyone that has a 240 day old player that has obviously been boosting in my conf, not just me That is over 165 players in my conf alone.

Do you understand? or are you just being obtuse because you refuse to admit your wrong after you yourself have posted the advantages such a team has over another?

Originally posted by JDragon
if the other team had a 1150 or 1200 PV poorly built DT, you wouldn't be calling out that dot for being omg level 79

I don't think anywhere in this thread I posted "OMG" Don't be a drama queen.

I think the other guy is right. Your starting to look silly, grasping for straws to prove you are right when you, yourself have posted you are wrong.

Bottom Line, No paying team should have to play another team at a disadvantage in training or alg's. Everyone who pays should have the same opportunity at success.

I hope the new rule means you wont be able to gut and move your team around. I didn't see that specifically addressed in the announcement so I don't no if it really is fixed or not. If I was aware people where doing this stuff I would have bought up or had friends buy up the CPU teams in my conf, so these guys couldn't have gotten away with this.

On a side note those teams players must really suck if they have to have them play players one or two seasons behind them to be successful. How pathetic is that?