Warrior General Games

Originally posted by bhall43
LOL will have no problems at all. And I don't OC Porto. Haven't in many seasons.

Okay so why not release and re-sign players every season then.

Just for fun.

And why not stop defending the obviously irrelevent Chemistry system then?

If it does nothing, why have it?

Originally posted by bhall43
Look at all those networks that are cycling 11 players. >_<

Yeah, I have to admit I am surprised by the chem states in WL. Though the only team I know is a big network one is GD and they do have a 92 Chem.

Originally posted by yello1
Okay so why not release and re-sign players every season then.

Just for fun.

And why not stop defending the obviously irrelevent Chemistry system then?

If it does nothing, why have it?

Why not make sense? >_<

Obviously it does something. IT IS SUPPOSED TO.

Originally posted by yello1
There really needs to be a pumping fist smilely.

Its not about me. Anything you say to that point is irrelevant.

Now, are you suggesting that it would be equally easy for any team to win with a 2-9% reduction to its player's skills or attributes than it would be without the penalty?

Would you care to release 22 of your players every single season and resign them to test that ludicrous hypothesis Einstein?

LOL wut?

You don't own any teams and all you are on any real level team is a Special Teams Coach????

Well, guess you can't back up that theory. If you ever run a team, do come in here and show us how you cycled players to get that chemistry penalty so you would win more with it.

yo dumbass, how many gold owner trophies do you have? I have 4 plus a silver. My most recent gold is from season 23, When I own a team, I actually RUN the whole team other than the occasional DC. when was your last gold and how little do you actually participate? Your complete stupidity never ceases to amaze me. All your suggestions are ALL about you and your inability to comprehend the game so you come up with whacked out idea after whacked out idea after whacked out idea.

as far as backing up my claim, if you could actually read, you would have read that I had already provided the support. Season 23, i bought a team an hour b4 game 2, and we went 19-0 the rest of the season even tho I was recruiting from scratch the entire season, and as I recall, our chemistry was in the upper 70s come the title game.

Good owners don't have to recruit 22 players every season. Thats the difference between you and I, I would never need to recruit 22 new players to a team that I had owned the season before. Had I wanted to keep my team after season 23, all the agents had been willing to stay, but unlike you, I only run a team when I actually have the IRL time to do so. I don't waste the agents FP by owning a team that I can give it my full attention.

is this a thread about OffTopica Atheists?
we are winning gold if anyone is wondering.

Originally posted by The Second Coming of Rusty Trombone
is this a thread about OffTopica Atheists?
we are winning gold if anyone is wondering.

27 overall chem? its like you aren't even paying attention here

Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader


Any team bhall is associated with will outperform one you're in charge of--that's kind of the point of the resistance to your suggestion. "Chemistry" is only a problem for teams that really aren't on top of their game to begin with.

So chemistry doesnt matter then.

Why should we have the system then????

If the two percent is meaningless, why bother?

You are right. I should edit the OP to "Chemistry is too weak, lets get rid of it."

Thanks, I see the light now.

Okay, now that the stupid is out of the way, lets be real. Chemistry effects an actual no bullsht minus to everything your team does of some percentage value. There is zero chances in heck that this would not impact a "good team''s chances of winning a game that was otherwise evenly matched. Thats called simple logic anyone with an IQ over 100 should be able to see as truth.

Chemistry is only not a problem to the more powerful teams because of the imbalance between them and the lower teams. That imbalance is not because the better teams have larger penis, its because the system fucks over the teams that have lost in the past or who are pick up teams. This keeps them down.

Chemistry is one such thing that keeps them down.

Its a large part of the problem game design wise with it. The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer.

That is how you wind up with the "1%" being the only percent left in your customer base.

Since Bort probably would like to keep the whole 100% paying him, I would strongly suggest that chemistry be toned down, per the OP.

As it is, this dot paid for this seasons chemistry hit. Very sad, he had another season in him but I ain't buying flex for this. So he had to go.
http://goallineblitz.com/game/player.pl?player_id=1912018 *OPEN*

no big loss on that dot either

tbh, if you retired all your underwhelmingly built dots your home page might be blank

Originally posted by yello1
Originally posted by bhall43

The point is to not cycle through players so much. ldo.


Tho I find it funny that this "isn't about you" when clearly you are the one having the trouble with it.

I am the one posting suggestions on how to fix it.

That does not logically make me the only one who has "trouble" with it.

It just makes me more vocal.

I am sure the guy with 15 chemistry is frakking thrilled with his team's chances.

As for not cycling through players, one the game is about football cycling through players is the norm for the sport post free agency (or in all lower tiers always). Secondly, with decline you are going to lose at least 20% of your roster every season (or 100% every five seasons).

Which means that any loss to free agency or inactivity is going to put you into the "cycling players" routine.

And people being people (inactives, flutter by tourist free agents, and the self feeding loop of bad chemistry makes bad record that drives dots away that makes bad chemistry - did you really miss the wall of cycle above?), unless you are in a tight network, or a solo owner, you will always be cycling players or if not always at least often enough that its going to leave you vulnerable to the chemistry down cycle.

I moved a entire team from casual to a regular team and my chemistry is in the crapper. yet I am willing to about bet that even though my team is in the strongest league at their age level that I make the playoffs and still have a shot at contending for a championship at seasons end. decent owners with good builds on their teams can still be competitive even when their chemistry is in the crapper.

Yello1 your problem here just isn't chemistry your problem also stems from you yourself. you do not pay alot of attention to your teams. seriously no need to try to argue this point. especially since you have so many teams and yet you spend a ton of time making suggestions when you could use that time alot better. another aspect that you aren't considering is the players on the teams aren't the best built dots from what I have looked at. so your problems are no where near just chemistry.

basically this suggestion screams of you making a excuse for being a crappy owner and fielding crappy teams. I am sorry if this makes you mad or hurts your feelings. I am also sorry to all your little minions that I am sure I will start hearing from with their usual threats. seriously yello1 if you want to blame something for your teams not being able to be successful. simply get out of the computer chair and walk to the nearest mirror. and when you do the person looking back at you is who you need to blame for having crappy teams that can't compete.

oh lordy lord

Originally posted by yello1
Oh and I see you OC the Porto Alegre Smugglers who have a chemistry only a few points higher than my team, at 66, and co-own the Lake Opeta Legionnaires at 69 as well and the OffTopica Atheists (:angry at 23.

Lets see how you do over your first games of the season, shall we?






I actually laughed out loud at this. Porto prb wont lose a game until after their chem is 100 if history serves, and they could prb beat your team with defense alone and their kicker at QB.

-1 chemistry seems fine as it is to me.
most teams have full chem, or very close to, by the first game of the next season anyway.

Originally posted by bhall43
Why not make sense? >_<

Obviously it does something. IT IS SUPPOSED TO.

Well you all were just telling me for pages on pages how it DOESNT mean anything to you and the uber teams.

So which is it?

Does it have an impact or not?

Originally posted by Dustin.
-1 chemistry seems fine as it is to me.
most teams have full chem, or very close to, by the first game of the next season anyway.


See my OPro league. See World League.

Most of the teams in OPro will NOT have full chemistry for ten or more games.

World League is not much better, some every bit as bad.

Originally posted by hatchman
I moved a entire team from casual to a regular team and my chemistry is in the crapper. yet I am willing to about bet that even though my team is in the strongest league at their age level that I make the playoffs and still have a shot at contending for a championship at seasons end. decent owners with good builds on their teams can still be competitive even when their chemistry is in the crapper.

Yello1 your problem here just isn't chemistry your problem also stems from you yourself. you do not pay alot of attention to your teams. seriously no need to try to argue this point. especially since you have so many teams and yet you spend a ton of time making suggestions when you could use that time alot better. another aspect that you aren't considering is the players on the teams aren't the best built dots from what I have looked at. so your problems are no where near just chemistry.

basically this suggestion screams of you making a excuse for being a crappy owner and fielding crappy teams. I am sorry if this makes you mad or hurts your feelings. I am also sorry to all your little minions that I am sure I will start hearing from with their usual threats. seriously yello1 if you want to blame something for your teams not being able to be successful. simply get out of the computer chair and walk to the nearest mirror. and when you do the person looking back at you is who you need to blame for having crappy teams that can't compete.


Blah Blah Blah

Its not about me.

Its about ALL of the teams with 60 to 70 chemistry.

Either it has an effect, or it doesnt.

Which is it?

Originally posted by reddogrw
no big loss on that dot either

tbh, if you retired all your underwhelmingly built dots your home page might be blank

You do not understand drama.