Warrior General Games

snypah

Originally posted by Jughead
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=snypah

+1

well played...

Well we won a tough one vs. Tet.

Are we cool to sub in the Maori to face Beijing Black Dragons?

Because of the flexibility you guys are showing - lets give Beijing home field on this one.

Originally posted by Jughead
Well we won a tough one vs. Tet.

Are we cool to sub in the Maori to face Beijing Black Dragons?

Because of the flexibility you guys are showing - lets give Beijing home field on this one.

I got no problem w/ it, but Im not the one callin the shots on The Pacific Challenge...

Originally posted by Jughead
Well we won a tough one vs. Tet.

Are we cool to sub in the Maori to face Beijing Black Dragons?

Because of the flexibility you guys are showing - lets give Beijing home field on this one.

I am up for it though am not in charge of the set up.

Originally posted by MontanaRuled
I am up for it though am not in charge of the set up.



I think the game should be played. HB mentioned earlier he was looking for someone to step up.

+1 for playing it... No one wants to win or lose a League VS. challenge on a forfeit..

Originally posted by fool
+1 for playing it... No one wants to win or lose a League VS. challenge on a forfeit..

i wouldnt mind winning that way, but id hate to lose that way

Originally posted by Mad Cow
Originally posted by fool

+1 for playing it... No one wants to win or lose a League VS. challenge on a forfeit..

i wouldnt mind winning that way, but id hate to lose that way

we wouldn't lose that way because none of our owners would commit to playing, then leave our region high and dry like this.

i think having one team play two games kinda defeats the purpose. but the alternative of having some team playing in the challenge that didn't want to initially isn't exactly attractive either.

honestly, i think it should be beijing's call. they did everything they were supposed to do. if they want to play another team, i say let them.

whats the current standing? we winning right?

Originally posted by Joe Boo
we wouldn't lose that way because none of our owners would commit to playing, then leave our region high and dry like this.

i think having one team play two games kinda defeats the purpose. but the alternative of having some team playing in the challenge that didn't want to initially isn't exactly attractive either.

honestly, i think it should be beijing's call. they did everything they were supposed to do. if they want to play another team, i say let them.



maybe I misread the thread earlier...

Beijing already won their challenge game and are playing a 2nd one?

or

they won by forfiet and the team that forfiet is being replaced???

Originally posted by PFDS
whats the current standing? we winning right?

Tied - with 1 game as a possible forfeit (in SEA's favor) up in the air.

This would be the proposed match-up: http://goallineblitz.com/game/compare_teams.pl?team1=4989&team2=4135.

Personally I think Joe B. is correct - it is Beijing's call.

They showed up to the dance while Auckland stayed home.

I have no problem in calling it a win for SEA and we just do another one next season.

Originally posted by Victory Jones
....or

they won by forfiet and the team that forfiet is being replaced???

That's the proposal I'm offering.

Originally posted by Jughead
Originally posted by Victory Jones

....or

they won by forfiet and the team that forfiet is being replaced???

That's the proposal I'm offering.



ok...

I thought for a second that Beijing had won and had to play a second game...


proceed...