Originally posted by Galkuris
Originally posted by islander1
Originally posted by Galkuris
Originally posted by Saris
It's probably something like pitches using the same logic as a knocked loose pass. Then when he changes how defenders react to pitches on 5/14, inadvertently it changes the interception dynamic when the ball is knocked loose. I don't think it was an intentional change anyway.
Underrated post imo. Often times changing one section of code can have an effect on another part. Coding a game like this is not as simple as:
Pass thrown;
check for int;
check for deflection;
.
.
.
check for knock loose;
check for INT after knock loose;
I can guarantee that.
Now, that doesn't excuse this issue, and it IS a problem for teams that actually like to pass more often. Maybe you haven't noticed but the three teams that are sitting at the top right nowin the West...love to run it as much as possible. Heck, even the #4 team likes to run it, but we had more of a risk/reward type offense on first, so this change murdered us when we got the risk side and had to pass on 2nd/3rd downs. Heck, even the fast rising team of Texas made their biggest wins (WW, Compton, Drinkin) after the change...and they too rely heavily on the running game.
I think most every team wanted and tried passing more early in the season. I don't know of any team that wants their WR's to be completely meaningless in the team season in and out.
Yet here we are, 3 seasons later.
Ya, that is partly what I meant though. For the first 8 weeks it looked like passing was a really good option, similar to season 6/7 where both passing and running worked together.
the unfortunate truth is pass coverage (man) was broken all that time. So Bort's passing changes to make it viable involved eliminating man coverage (so to speak). Brilliant.