Warrior General Games

Meh...if you ask me there are way too many "Pick Six"'s. Sure, it's cool to see defensive TD's, but it happens in almost every game on GLB.

Originally posted by Atatakakunai
Originally posted by AD_MVP

I disagree. This is a video game, so you don't want this to mirror real life exactly or else it would get boring. The great thing about video game football, in my opinion, IS the inflated stats. It just makes the game more fun to watch

obviously offensive coordinator.

and D tbh. I like the high sacks, picks, FFs as well as offensive stats

Originally posted by Bluejays4ws
Meh...if you ask me there are way too many "Pick Six"'s. Sure, it's cool to see defensive TD's, but it happens in almost every game on GLB.

o_O

Originally posted by xhail2skinsx
Originally posted by AD_MVP

Originally posted by Bluejays4ws


Meh...if you ask me there are way too many "Pick Six"'s. Sure, it's cool to see defensive TD's, but it happens in almost every game on GLB.

o_O



WTF!?!

Not sure why he's saying that, but let's keep this thread alive.

he made this thread because of his team

Originally posted by AD_MVP
Originally posted by Atatakakunai

Originally posted by AD_MVP


I disagree. This is a video game, so you don't want this to mirror real life exactly or else it would get boring. The great thing about video game football, in my opinion, IS the inflated stats. It just makes the game more fun to watch

obviously offensive coordinator.

and D tbh. I like the high sacks, picks, FFs as well as offensive stats

I want realistic stats. When something's too common, it becomes trivial.

The more realistic things are, the more you can coach as if you were coaching a real team, build players as if you were building for a real team, etc..

I would say that a pro-offense bias is better than a pro-defense bias, for reasons of excitement; but ideally there wouldn't be much bias either way.

Defense needs to be bumped up

Originally posted by FoF
Defense needs to be bumped up

I agree that is does, to some extent.

End the forced drop-off of LB's on running plays, and improve zone defense coverage, IMO-- especially the first, as it's totally unrealistic and was only there to balance things.

Now that defense needs a bit of a boost, get rid of the artificial "I know this is a run defense and I'm even +run, but I'm going to back up 3 yards to make sure I give the offense plenty of chance to block me before I actually go after the ballcarrier."

I Approve of this message.. +1

yeah theres a DE in my leauge with over 110 sacks on the seaon. WHAT

Originally posted by buckeyejoe2745
yeah theres a DE in my leauge with over 110 sacks on the seaon. WHAT

Bort's in a lose/lose spot, because whiners go nuts if he does anything to make sack number more realistic, but then those of us who want realism get upset that he won't.

I wish Bort would listen to the realism crowd as he does on most issues, but he hasn't on this one.

The problem with people losing sack totals is that it gives way for offensive numbers to be ridiculous. That's why I'm suggesting this stuff!

Originally posted by Kayoh
The problem with people losing sack totals is that it gives way for offensive numbers to be ridiculous. That's why I'm suggesting this stuff!

So better for defensive numbers to be ridiculous?

I keep intoning over and over...no forced LB drop-off, plus better zone defenses.

Fix those and offensive numbers will be realistic, even when sack totals are also fixed-- and they need to be. My team's exhibition game today, the opposing LDE made it unblocked over and over again against a softcapped Agility, over 30 Speed OT.