User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
brigmar
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by redskins0756

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert


It's an explanation, not an excuse.


In the context that you said it, it was an excuse.


No it wasn't, and even if it was, that's not relevant to Chad's argument that I'm a sore loser, because as I stated before, just having an excuse doesnt mean that somebody is a sore loser, excuses are well excuses, they serve a purpose. There may be a correlation between people who make excuses that are sore losers, but it is not an automatic qualifier.


The purpose of an excuse is used to absolve responsibility. You qualify.

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Again, you have to beat me before you have the right to accuse me of being a sore loser

He did. You are.

Here's a free one: All you needed to say was "Show me a good loser, and I'll show you a loser". That would have been game over and /victory

Another free one: Whilst your posts sound logical in and of themselves, they are, taken in the context of other posts you make, inconsistent and downright fallacious. This is why people call you to the mat.

 
Link
 
Too much wrong with your post, I'm not even going to bother, I've addressed all of those inaccuracies in your above post throughout this thread and other threads. If you were to pay attention to the full content of what I have posted and you were to correctly interpret it you would find that there are 5 different errors in your above post.
 
brigmar
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Too much wrong with your post, I'm not even going to bother, I've addressed all of those inaccuracies in your above post throughout this thread and other threads. If you were to pay attention to the full content of what I have posted and you were to correctly interpret it you would find that there are 5 different errors in your above post.


/lose
 
HoggLife
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by brigmar
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert

Too much wrong with your post, I'm not even going to bother, I've addressed all of those inaccuracies in your above post throughout this thread and other threads. If you were to pay attention to the full content of what I have posted and you were to correctly interpret it you would find that there are 5 different errors in your above post.


/lose


When you stump him that is what he does or he will say something like "You are wasting my time with your nonsense" or make a reason not to reply cause he too doesnt even believe the garbage that he says he just likes to talk just to talk.
 
IceMan
offline
Link
 
Randy Moss is beasting it up, tearing kids u everywhere!
 
bigtisme
offline
Link
 
Good game Wildcats. I think we ruined your career 3 game win streak on the warriors.
 
suhgamer
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by IceMan
Randy Moss is beasting it up, tearing kids u everywhere!


Love how Supernovas forced it to Moss in the end and Neon Deion jumped the route and sealed the game today.

Would rather have the win over the stats. GG nonetheless.
Last edited Jul 11, 2008 15:19:12
 
Shagg
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by suhgamer
Originally posted by IceMan

Randy Moss is beasting it up, tearing kids u everywhere!


Love how Supernovas forced it to Moss in the end and Neon Deion jumped the route and sealed the game today.

Would rather have the win over the stats. GG nonetheless.


Yeah was a very good game that TO at the end killed us. Still I like our teams progress and any little improvement is good for us going into next season. We have some high level guys coming in next season and we'l be ready. Good game DDT always liked your team.
 
morgan3
offline
Link
 
DDT Lost to Philly today 16-7
 
HoggLife
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by morgan3
DDT Lost to Philly today 16-7


Wow a West team lost to a East team. What is your point. We all know that the West is deeper in talented teams but the East has the best 4 or 5 teams in all of GLB! Come on the Mustangs are #5 in the East. That has to say something!

I'd be willing to bet if the East Vrs West played our #1 vrs your #1, our #2 vrs your #2 down the top 6 the East would be 6-0 in those matchups!
Last edited Jul 13, 2008 13:35:42
 
Galkuris
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by HoggLife
Originally posted by morgan3

DDT Lost to Philly today 16-7


Wow a West team lost to a East team. What is your point. We all know that the West is deeper in talented teams but the East has the best 4 or 5 teams in all of GLB! Come on the Mustangs are #5 in the East. That has to say something!

I'd be willing to bet if the East Vrs West played our #1 vrs your #1, our #2 vrs your #2 down the top 6 the East would be 6-0 in those matchups!


Except that the Easts #1 lost to the Wests #5 and the Easts #3 lost to the Wests #4.
 
Judan
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Galkuris

Wow a West team lost to a East team. What is your point. We all know that the West is deeper in talented teams but the East has the best 4 or 5 teams in all of GLB! Come on the Mustangs are #5 in the East. That has to say something!

I'd be willing to bet if the East Vrs West played our #1 vrs your #1, our #2 vrs your #2 down the top 6 the East would be 6-0 in those matchups!


Except that the Easts #1 lost to the Wests #5 and the Easts #3 lost to the Wests #4.

One game is hardly indicative.

We'd have to sim those games 1000 times to even remotely have a reasonable idea.

It is why these threads are pointless.
Last edited Jul 13, 2008 14:00:19
 
ledyard2000
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Doc
Originally posted by Galkuris


Wow a West team lost to a East team. What is your point. We all know that the West is deeper in talented teams but the East has the best 4 or 5 teams in all of GLB! Come on the Mustangs are #5 in the East. That has to say something!

I'd be willing to bet if the East Vrs West played our #1 vrs your #1, our #2 vrs your #2 down the top 6 the East would be 6-0 in those matchups!


Except that the Easts #1 lost to the Wests #5 and the Easts #3 lost to the Wests #4.

One game is hardly indicative.

We'd have to sim those games 1000 times to even remotely have a reasonable idea.

It is why these threads are pointless.


Exactly, also Hogg usually I defend you but you must have started drinking pretty early today to think that if the games were played based on seed that the East top 6 would go 6-0 against the West's top 6, lol
 
Galkuris
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Doc
Originally posted by Galkuris


Wow a West team lost to a East team. What is your point. We all know that the West is deeper in talented teams but the East has the best 4 or 5 teams in all of GLB! Come on the Mustangs are #5 in the East. That has to say something!

I'd be willing to bet if the East Vrs West played our #1 vrs your #1, our #2 vrs your #2 down the top 6 the East would be 6-0 in those matchups!


Except that the Easts #1 lost to the Wests #5 and the Easts #3 lost to the Wests #4.

One game is hardly indicative.

We'd have to sim those games 1000 times to even remotely have a reasonable idea.

It is why these threads are pointless.


That was 2 games, not 1. And the point was they didn't only lose, they lost to LOWER seeds. I was just pointing out how dumb the comment by Hogglife was.
 
brigmar
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Galkuris
That was 2 games, not 1. And the point was they didn't only lose, they lost to LOWER seeds. I was just pointing out how dumb the comment by Hogglife was.
Newsflash !! Dumb comment by Hogglife!!
But back to our main story: Bears do, in fact, shit in the woods

 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.