Warrior General Games

Originally posted by jdbolick

...but if you insist on posting your nonsense publicly then I am going to humiliate you.


Unfortunately I think issacar is too stupid to realize when he's been humiliated.

Originally posted by jdbolick

It's the only thing I see on that site. Regardless of your semantic bullshit, rt.com is clearly in the business of promoting tinfoil theories.


So you have qualified direct sources that disprove what's on the site? How are you to know that the mainstream media is absolutely correct and accurate?

Originally posted by taurran
Originally posted by Serenity

Oh no, 3000 people did.

Big deal.

I mean it's not anywhere near as bad as say The Cambodian Genocide for example and how many people remember that?

Face it, Americans need to wake up and realize they aren't precious little princesses and that 9/11 was tiny on the scale of things.

So if I came to your house and killed your entire family, you'd have no reason to be sad or angry.


You're also an idiot if you don't realize how many people have died as a result of 9/11. It was a single act, and it's been responsible for the death of many more thousands (or millions) since then.

People who were actually personally impacted by the attacks have a reason to be sad.

However the amount of people out of a country of over 300 million who were impacted is pretty tiny.

There is plenty of evidence to demonstrate that people aren't really impacted by death unless it personally impacts them (otherwise there would be a lot more support for all those people dying of malnutrition in Africa for example)

Most of the support for 9/11 is from people who feel obligated to "be sad" and not because they actually care.


Also ~2 million people were killed in the Cambodian Genocide. Even if you want to go with all the deaths caused by the war afterwards it still doesn't come close to that.

Originally posted by taurran
So you have qualified direct sources that disprove what's on the site? How are you to know that the mainstream media is absolutely correct and accurate?

He has yet to post a source that says Assad did it...

Originally posted by taurran
Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader


Face it, we're kind of a Big Deal.

Unlike Canada.

It's painfully obvious the Canadians in this forum are butthurt little whiners, who constantly feel the need to make every single issue into an attempt to slander the US as a nation.

We don't have to. You guys make yourselves look bad enough on your own.

Originally posted by Serenity
We don't have to. You guys make yourselves look bad enough on your own.

English Canada is making Canada look pretty bad by voting for Harper in the previous elections.... GJ for voting back the canadian verison of George W. Bush....

Originally posted by Serenity
People who were actually personally impacted by the attacks have a reason to be sad.

However the amount of people out of a country of over 300 million who were impacted is pretty tiny.

There is plenty of evidence to demonstrate that people aren't really impacted by death unless it personally impacts them (otherwise there would be a lot more support for all those people dying of malnutrition in Africa for example)

Most of the support for 9/11 is from people who feel obligated to "be sad" and not because they actually care.


Also ~2 million people were killed in the Cambodian Genocide. Even if you want to go with all the deaths caused by the war afterwards it still doesn't come close to that.

Seems like arbitrary qualifications you're introducing to attempt to justify your ridiculous pathetic hate for anything US-related.

By your line of idiotic logic, you shouldn't even feel sad for the Cambodian Genocide, because there were more Jews that died in the Holocaust.

Got any more great hypocritical lines of pathetic idiocy for us today?

Originally posted by Serenity
We don't have to. You guys make yourselves look bad enough on your own.

We're not the ones claiming that you can't be sad about an event, as long as another event before it had a greater magnitude of deaths, and at the same time using an example that can easily be trumped by another event that involved more deaths.

You are the epitome of stupid, as far as this thread goes.

Originally posted by taurran
So you have qualified direct sources that disprove what's on the site? How are you to know that the mainstream media is absolutely correct and accurate?


#1) It is known that Assad has a huge stockpile of chemical weapons. Not suspected, it's known. Even Assad doesn't deny this.

#2) Because I'm not an uninformed sheep who is unaware of events until it is posted on a favorite website, I knew that there were at least two confirmed incidents of chemical weapons use in the Syrian conflict prior to the August 21st attack that finally got a lot of media attention. Here's one from May that came from embedded French reporters: http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2013/05/27/chemical-war-in-syria_3417708_3218.html

#3) In both the August 21st attack and at least one of the previous attacks, intact shell delivery was documented at the scene. Even though nothing but rumors even suggests that the Syrian rebels have access to sarin, they have absolutely no ability to carry out a sophisticated rocket-delivery of sarin. Assad does.

#4) In the 48 hours following the August 21st attack, Syrian forces blasted the ever-loving shit out of Ghouta. There is no military explanation for such massive use of force aside from wanting to destroy evidence.

Originally posted by jdbolick



#1) It is known that Assad has a huge stockpile of chemical weapons. Not suspected, it's known. Even Assad doesn't deny this.

#2) Because I'm not an uninformed sheep who is unaware of events until it is posted on a favorite website, I knew that there were at least two confirmed incidents of chemical weapons use in the Syrian conflict prior to the August 21st attack that finally got a lot of media attention. Here's one from May that came from embedded French reporters: http://www.lemonde.fr/proche-orient/article/2013/05/27/chemical-war-in-syria_3417708_3218.html

#3) In both the August 21st attack and at least one of the previous attacks, intact shell delivery was documented at the scene. Even though nothing but rumors even suggests that the Syrian rebels have access to sarin, they have absolutely no ability to carry out a sophisticated rocket-delivery of sarin. Assad does.

#4) In the 48 hours following the August 21st attack, Syrian forces blasted the ever-loving shit out of Ghouta. There is no military explanation for such massive use of force aside from wanting to destroy evidence.

Do you know what circumstantial means?

There are conflicting reports from pretty much every other investigative source. What exactly do you believe Assad had to gain by using chemical weapons?

Cui bono?

the CIA can help a homeless retard to launch a missile

Originally posted by revolution17

Cui bono?

the CIA can help a homeless retard to launch a missile

No way, the CIA is always up front and transparent about their operations. They don't CONSPIRE.

Originally posted by issacar
English Canada is making Canada look pretty bad by voting for Harper in the previous elections.... GJ for voting back the canadian verison of George W. Bush....



a minority of canadian votes outside of quebec were for the conservatives. not to mention that the seats the cons /did/ win in quebec were in predominantly french speaking areas.

Originally posted by Gart888


a minority of canadian votes outside of quebec were for the conservatives. not to mention that the seats the cons /did/ win in quebec were in predominantly french speaking areas.

Québec largely voted for the NPD, while Québec City voted for Harper, which is only one county in hte whole province, overall i think 2-3 county voted harper.

Also your premise would imply that Harper does not have a majority govenrment at the moment...