Originally posted by jdbolick
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Oh, I could write a dissertation on the amount of times I've caught bolick being dishonest, but I won't. Generally, he either quotes an agent's statements out of context to try and show that they said something different than what they actually said or he'll use incomplete statistics to support an argument when looking at all of the relevant statistics proves the opposite of what he claims. For example, he just stated that he statistically proved that my CBs were inferior to his in two threads. In the first thread, his proof was that his CBs "made a play" on a higher percentage of their targets. Well his proof failed to include INTs as making a play. Had he done so, the statistics would show that my CB made a play on a higher percentage of targets. He also failed to include statistics like the fact that my CB had a lower amount of receptions allowed, more TFLs, and fewer missed tackles.
I like how you not only accuse me of lying when I'm not and you are, but you tell those lies already knowing that I have proof to expose them. That's why I don't think your delusion is an act. You really are this out of touch with reality that your mind changes the entire world where you're right and everyone else on the planet is wrong. In any case, here's the proof that LHF is lying about me not including INTs or tackles:
INTs included:
Originally posted by jdbolick
Check that math again.
YMXI: 47 receptions allowed on 82 targets = 57.3% allowed
Third: 40 receptions allowed on 79 targets = 50.6% allowed
Roark: 47 receptions allowed on 86 targets = 54.7% allowed
So yeah, mine were better than yours last season. And that's only if you look at receptions allowed, which includes bad passes from the QB or times when you had safety help over the top for your slow-ass corner. As I've said many times, if you want to isolate where the cornerback was actually responsible for preventing a completion then you need to add pass deflections + knocked loose + interceptions.
YMXI: 17 PDs, 4 KLs, & 2 INTs on 82 targets = 28.0% stops
Third: 30 PDs, 2 KLs, & 0 INTs on 79 targets = 40.5% stops
Roark: 27 PDs, 6 KLs, & 1 INT on 86 targets = 39.5% stops
So yeah, my corners fucking crushed yours last season. Since this is the part where you always accuse me of lying, what does that make you?
And tackles:
Originally posted by jdbolick
Over the last two seasons:
Yes Man XI: Eradication - made 93.3% of his tackle attempts
Yes Man XII: Ruination - made 83.9% of his tackle attempts
Third - made 92.6% of his tackle attempts
Roark - made 90.4% of his tackle attempts
Taking a second piece of make tackle for a corner was a huge waste, dude. It's funny that you keep insisting that I made a mistake by not doing it when hardly any good corner builders doubles up on make tackle because we all know that it's a bad move.
Here I'll attribute it to your lack of reading comprehension instead of any nefarious intent. The stats you just posted are all from the second thread you linked. If you notice, I was referring to the first thread as I expressly stated.
You are also doing the same thing you did before and using incomplete statistics dishonestly. As I've stated numerous times, those stats you posted didn't take KLs into account in the receptions allowed category and you're still choosing not to include TFLs as well as total missed tackles. You should also include their playoff stats which I included in response in that thread yet you conveniently failed to include. I wonder how our CBs' performance compared in the playoffs?
Oh yes:
YMXI: 4 targets, 1 reception allowed (25%), 2 PD, 0 INT (50%), 1 tackle, 1 missed tackle, 2 wins
Third: 24 targets, 16 receptions allowed (66.7%), 6 PD (25%), 13 tackles, 0 missed tackles, 1 win, 1 loss
Roark: 10 targets, 4 receptions allowed (40%), 3 PD, 1 INT (40%), 7 tackles, 0 missed tackles, 1 win, 1 loss
And you also failed to include their stats from their entire WL careers. How'd that work out?
YMX (3 full seasons): 101 receptions allowed, 210 targets (48.1%), 51 PDs, 8 INTs (28%), 111 tackles, 14 missed tackles (11%), 9 TFL, 1 FF,
Roark (2 seasons plus 10 games): 125 receptions allowed, 238 targets (52.5%), 65 PDs, 1 INT (27%), 137 tackles, 15 missed tackles (11%), 5 TFL, 1 FF
Third (2 seasons plus 10 games): 107 receptions allowed, 204 targets (52.5%), 73 PDs, 0 INTs (35%), 102 tackles, 11 missed tackles (10.7%), 1 TFL, 0 FF
As I said, lies and dishonesty. And with that, I'll let the thread get back on topic.
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Oh, I could write a dissertation on the amount of times I've caught bolick being dishonest, but I won't. Generally, he either quotes an agent's statements out of context to try and show that they said something different than what they actually said or he'll use incomplete statistics to support an argument when looking at all of the relevant statistics proves the opposite of what he claims. For example, he just stated that he statistically proved that my CBs were inferior to his in two threads. In the first thread, his proof was that his CBs "made a play" on a higher percentage of their targets. Well his proof failed to include INTs as making a play. Had he done so, the statistics would show that my CB made a play on a higher percentage of targets. He also failed to include statistics like the fact that my CB had a lower amount of receptions allowed, more TFLs, and fewer missed tackles.
I like how you not only accuse me of lying when I'm not and you are, but you tell those lies already knowing that I have proof to expose them. That's why I don't think your delusion is an act. You really are this out of touch with reality that your mind changes the entire world where you're right and everyone else on the planet is wrong. In any case, here's the proof that LHF is lying about me not including INTs or tackles:
INTs included:
Originally posted by jdbolick
Check that math again.
YMXI: 47 receptions allowed on 82 targets = 57.3% allowed
Third: 40 receptions allowed on 79 targets = 50.6% allowed
Roark: 47 receptions allowed on 86 targets = 54.7% allowed
So yeah, mine were better than yours last season. And that's only if you look at receptions allowed, which includes bad passes from the QB or times when you had safety help over the top for your slow-ass corner. As I've said many times, if you want to isolate where the cornerback was actually responsible for preventing a completion then you need to add pass deflections + knocked loose + interceptions.
YMXI: 17 PDs, 4 KLs, & 2 INTs on 82 targets = 28.0% stops
Third: 30 PDs, 2 KLs, & 0 INTs on 79 targets = 40.5% stops
Roark: 27 PDs, 6 KLs, & 1 INT on 86 targets = 39.5% stops
So yeah, my corners fucking crushed yours last season. Since this is the part where you always accuse me of lying, what does that make you?
And tackles:
Originally posted by jdbolick
Over the last two seasons:
Yes Man XI: Eradication - made 93.3% of his tackle attempts
Yes Man XII: Ruination - made 83.9% of his tackle attempts
Third - made 92.6% of his tackle attempts
Roark - made 90.4% of his tackle attempts
Taking a second piece of make tackle for a corner was a huge waste, dude. It's funny that you keep insisting that I made a mistake by not doing it when hardly any good corner builders doubles up on make tackle because we all know that it's a bad move.
Here I'll attribute it to your lack of reading comprehension instead of any nefarious intent. The stats you just posted are all from the second thread you linked. If you notice, I was referring to the first thread as I expressly stated.
You are also doing the same thing you did before and using incomplete statistics dishonestly. As I've stated numerous times, those stats you posted didn't take KLs into account in the receptions allowed category and you're still choosing not to include TFLs as well as total missed tackles. You should also include their playoff stats which I included in response in that thread yet you conveniently failed to include. I wonder how our CBs' performance compared in the playoffs?
Oh yes:
YMXI: 4 targets, 1 reception allowed (25%), 2 PD, 0 INT (50%), 1 tackle, 1 missed tackle, 2 wins
Third: 24 targets, 16 receptions allowed (66.7%), 6 PD (25%), 13 tackles, 0 missed tackles, 1 win, 1 loss
Roark: 10 targets, 4 receptions allowed (40%), 3 PD, 1 INT (40%), 7 tackles, 0 missed tackles, 1 win, 1 loss
And you also failed to include their stats from their entire WL careers. How'd that work out?
YMX (3 full seasons): 101 receptions allowed, 210 targets (48.1%), 51 PDs, 8 INTs (28%), 111 tackles, 14 missed tackles (11%), 9 TFL, 1 FF,
Roark (2 seasons plus 10 games): 125 receptions allowed, 238 targets (52.5%), 65 PDs, 1 INT (27%), 137 tackles, 15 missed tackles (11%), 5 TFL, 1 FF
Third (2 seasons plus 10 games): 107 receptions allowed, 204 targets (52.5%), 73 PDs, 0 INTs (35%), 102 tackles, 11 missed tackles (10.7%), 1 TFL, 0 FF
As I said, lies and dishonesty. And with that, I'll let the thread get back on topic.
