Did Dub J just get bolicked?
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Pro's and Con's a discussion about coalitions in GLB
Achelon
offline
offline
I was going to add something to this conversation, than i remembered I have a life and i'm not a GLB nerd. nerds.
Originally posted by coachingubigr
Did Dub J just get bolicked?
Not enough separate quote boxes.
Did Dub J just get bolicked?
Not enough separate quote boxes.
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
And yet you make a post trying to claim to understand networks because you read through the PFs or recruiting pitches. Most networks don't do that shit and the ones that do tend to be the networks that fail. The top networks consist of a braintrust of coordinators and knowledgeable GLB vets along with a broad base of dot builders who can be trusted to build elite dots with minimal guidance. The best networks don't have build guides or step-by-step plans for what a build should be. A real network will give an idea of what they want and then let the builder have free-reign to get there.
You also fail to understand the value of networking to bring in good agents and the value that a dot can have in the process of working towards a title. An agent might not have a dot on a title winning team, but if they had a dot on the team the season before and that dot helped the team stay in the playoff hunt and be competitive so that the team earns a name for itself then they added value to the network.
Hell, look at doof. I didn't have much any idea of who they were prior to last season. They didn't win gold, but they sure did make a statement. Now I'm more likely to take one of my dots there since I know they can compete (and I'm sure other top builders feel the same). They have dots who were on their team last season that aren't there now or won't be there in the future. But if they name recognition they earned results in more success and a title later, then those agents helped that network and deserve to talk shit if that title is won.
But someone like you who can only think narrowly and short-term couldn't grasp that concept.
I thought this thread was about organized networks. Your definition of network is pretty broad and would almost include everyone at this site. It's cute how you pretend you're elite and drag a ton of irrelevant shit into this "discussion", though.
And yet you make a post trying to claim to understand networks because you read through the PFs or recruiting pitches. Most networks don't do that shit and the ones that do tend to be the networks that fail. The top networks consist of a braintrust of coordinators and knowledgeable GLB vets along with a broad base of dot builders who can be trusted to build elite dots with minimal guidance. The best networks don't have build guides or step-by-step plans for what a build should be. A real network will give an idea of what they want and then let the builder have free-reign to get there.
You also fail to understand the value of networking to bring in good agents and the value that a dot can have in the process of working towards a title. An agent might not have a dot on a title winning team, but if they had a dot on the team the season before and that dot helped the team stay in the playoff hunt and be competitive so that the team earns a name for itself then they added value to the network.
Hell, look at doof. I didn't have much any idea of who they were prior to last season. They didn't win gold, but they sure did make a statement. Now I'm more likely to take one of my dots there since I know they can compete (and I'm sure other top builders feel the same). They have dots who were on their team last season that aren't there now or won't be there in the future. But if they name recognition they earned results in more success and a title later, then those agents helped that network and deserve to talk shit if that title is won.
But someone like you who can only think narrowly and short-term couldn't grasp that concept.
I thought this thread was about organized networks. Your definition of network is pretty broad and would almost include everyone at this site. It's cute how you pretend you're elite and drag a ton of irrelevant shit into this "discussion", though.
Originally posted by Dub J
I thought this thread was about organized networks. Your definition of network is pretty broad and would almost include everyone at this site. It's cute how you pretend you're elite and drag a ton of irrelevant shit into this "discussion", though.
And you again spout off and prove that you are completely ignorant about how elite networks work. Keep on digging. And your last sentence just makes no sense.
I thought this thread was about organized networks. Your definition of network is pretty broad and would almost include everyone at this site. It's cute how you pretend you're elite and drag a ton of irrelevant shit into this "discussion", though.
And you again spout off and prove that you are completely ignorant about how elite networks work. Keep on digging. And your last sentence just makes no sense.
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
And you again spout off and prove that you are completely ignorant about how elite networks work. Keep on digging. And your last sentence just makes no sense.
You already told me they don't have build plans and don't recruit anyone to their coalition.
I'm assuming they're elite by serendipity since only the bestest of the bestest joins the coalition without being recruited.
And lol @ a braintrust of coordinators. If by "braintrust" you mean the same 2 or 3 coordinators running all the teams...
And you again spout off and prove that you are completely ignorant about how elite networks work. Keep on digging. And your last sentence just makes no sense.
You already told me they don't have build plans and don't recruit anyone to their coalition.
I'm assuming they're elite by serendipity since only the bestest of the bestest joins the coalition without being recruited.
And lol @ a braintrust of coordinators. If by "braintrust" you mean the same 2 or 3 coordinators running all the teams...
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
Hell, look at doof.
More of a franchise than an alliance/coalition, tbh.
Hell, look at doof.
More of a franchise than an alliance/coalition, tbh.
Originally posted by Dub J
You already told me they don't have build plans and don't recruit anyone to their coalition.
I'm assuming they're elite by serendipity since only the bestest of the bestest joins the coalition without being recruited.
And lol @ a braintrust of coordinators. If by "braintrust" you mean the same 2 or 3 coordinators running all the teams...
You really should just stop talking about networks until you actually have some knowledge of how they work.
Originally posted by Dub J
Alas...
another thread has been hijacked by LHF trying to prove to everyone he's leet.
No, this thread is about how you keeping talking about something you're ignorant about. The only reason I ever brought myself up was to give credibility to my statements by showing that I have first-hand knowledge--something you don't have.
You already told me they don't have build plans and don't recruit anyone to their coalition.
I'm assuming they're elite by serendipity since only the bestest of the bestest joins the coalition without being recruited.
And lol @ a braintrust of coordinators. If by "braintrust" you mean the same 2 or 3 coordinators running all the teams...
You really should just stop talking about networks until you actually have some knowledge of how they work.
Originally posted by Dub J
Alas...
another thread has been hijacked by LHF trying to prove to everyone he's leet.
No, this thread is about how you keeping talking about something you're ignorant about. The only reason I ever brought myself up was to give credibility to my statements by showing that I have first-hand knowledge--something you don't have.
Dub J
offline
offline
A few teams feeding one team is not a coalition...it's a franchise. You seem to be attempting to lump every team that has a farm team into the coalition group for the sake of proving something.
The only counters I've seen you make to my posts are "I'm leet cuz I'm with several different leet networks". The top dotbuilders gather into a group and you somehow try to explain that's how all coalitions work. No, that's how a very few coalitions work. There aren't an infinite number of the so-called elite dot builders out there. You're basing your claims on the fact you've seen how things work with the few coalition/alliances you're in (which by your own admission are ran differently than most of the coalitions I've seen).
The only counters I've seen you make to my posts are "I'm leet cuz I'm with several different leet networks". The top dotbuilders gather into a group and you somehow try to explain that's how all coalitions work. No, that's how a very few coalitions work. There aren't an infinite number of the so-called elite dot builders out there. You're basing your claims on the fact you've seen how things work with the few coalition/alliances you're in (which by your own admission are ran differently than most of the coalitions I've seen).
Novus
offline
offline
Wow, looks like my challenge back on Page 2...
Originally posted by Novus
Define "coalition."
Seriously. Define it.
...is looking pretty prescient now.
Hard to have a discussion about coalitions when people can't even agree on what a coalition is.
Originally posted by Novus
Define "coalition."
Seriously. Define it.
...is looking pretty prescient now.
Hard to have a discussion about coalitions when people can't even agree on what a coalition is.
Originally posted by Novus
...is looking pretty prescient now.
Hard to have a discussion about coalitions when people can't even agree on what a coalition is.
No it is hard to have a legit discussion with so many trolls trying to derail every thread in GLB main. I would have defined what I meant by coalition in the OP. But what is the use when the trolls have to screw every thread up in GLB main.
...is looking pretty prescient now.
Hard to have a discussion about coalitions when people can't even agree on what a coalition is.
No it is hard to have a legit discussion with so many trolls trying to derail every thread in GLB main. I would have defined what I meant by coalition in the OP. But what is the use when the trolls have to screw every thread up in GLB main.
Originally posted by hatchman
No it is hard to have a legit discussion with so many trolls trying to derail every thread in GLB main. I would have defined what I meant by coalition in the OP. But what is the use when the trolls have to screw every thread up in GLB main.
No it is hard to have a legit discussion with so many trolls trying to derail every thread in GLB main. I would have defined what I meant by coalition in the OP. But what is the use when the trolls have to screw every thread up in GLB main.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
