Warrior General Games

i dont care how he does it, as long as it gets fixed. im probably one of the few people who will sit and watch replays for every dot i own.

plays like this make sense http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2223997&pbp_id=3312090 that LOT wouldnt be able to block both but in GLB, they do all the time. ive even seen HBs block 2 guys at once. if bort fixed blocking, that would be nice.

i really dont care what the fix is, if offensive dots can get insane stats, defensive dots should be able to too.

My opinion is that against balanced competition, no dot should be getting insane stats (unless insanely built I guess, or used insanely well). It's also my opinion that we're closer to that then ever before.

As I stated earlier in this thread, I dislike how the interaction between 160 str olinemen and 90 str DEs work right now on running plays (on the flip side of this argument of blocking interaction). That is certainly one area I would like to see cleaned up on both sides.

It's possible Kop, I've argued this thread way more then necessary because I read the O.P. as a whiney "make it easier for MY dot to do something" post.

Just build them so the blockers don't even see you

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2358754&pbp_id=5027393

Originally posted by threadkiller
My opinion is that against balanced competition, no dot should be getting insane stats (unless insanely built I guess, or used insanely well). It's also my opinion that we're closer to that then ever before.

As I stated earlier in this thread, I dislike how the interaction between 160 str olinemen and 90 str DEs work right now on running plays (on the flip side of this argument of blocking interaction). That is certainly one area I would like to see cleaned up on both sides.

It's possible Kop, I've argued this thread way more then necessary because I read the O.P. as a whiney "make it easier for MY dot to do something" post.


its not really about my LBs, well it is but i also get frustrated when im DCing and some HB takes on my LB for 2 full seconds. i just think Blitzing LBs are pretty useless right now and they shouldnt be since they used to be a lot of fun. i think my FS did better than all my blitzers combined last season

Originally posted by B1G
Just build them so the blockers don't even see you

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2358754&pbp_id=5027393

we're in prep now, my last LB got DMVP, make it happen again. kthx.

but seriously im not asking for 50 sacks a season by every blitzing LB, i think having 1 a game on a well built dot or even 2-3 a game isnt asking much. when i have an extra guy going at the QB and he's being blocked by a LT that is holding a 160 strength DE and an 82 strength LB, i want to blow my brains out.

Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
we're in prep now, my last LB got DMVP, make it happen again. kthx.

but seriously im not asking for 50 sacks a season by every blitzing LB, i think having 1 a game on a well built dot or even 2-3 a game isnt asking much. when i have an extra guy going at the QB and he's being blocked by a LT that is holding a 160 strength DE and an 82 strength LB, i want to blow my brains out.

Don't send them at the LT then

Go at the LG, switch it up

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2386798&pbp_id=7736162

Originally posted by B1G
Don't send them at the LT then

Go at the LG, switch it up

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2386798&pbp_id=7736162

i blitz from every LB spot, i go through every game in certain formations/against certain formations. the LT was just an example. ive had Gs hold up 2 guys at once often.

Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
i blitz from every LB spot, i go through every game in certain formations/against certain formations. the LT was just an example. ive had Gs hold up 2 guys at once often.

What age dots?

Originally posted by B1G
What age dots?

120 and 160.

um...learn to build or learn 2 DC. I personally seen 3 different blitz lb'ers have pretty good success, and hit double digit sakcs. SO not sure wtf every1 is complaining about.

Oh yea, you want us to go back to the days where lb'ers could have 40 sacks a season? NGTH

Originally posted by Jay89
um...learn to build or learn 2 DC. I personally seen 3 different blitz lb'ers have pretty good success, and hit double digit sakcs. SO not sure wtf every1 is complaining about.

Oh yea, you want us to go back to the days where lb'ers could have 40 sacks a season? NGTH

youre 0-1 against me. youre bad. your opinions on any topic mean nothing to anyone besides yourself.

Originally posted by ProfessionalKop
youre 0-1 against me. youre bad. your opinions on any topic mean nothing to anyone besides yourself.


Dude your in here crying like a little bitch because you dont know how to blitz lb'ers. Just shut up and play the fucking game.

Originally posted by Jay89
um...learn to build or learn 2 DC. I personally seen 3 different blitz lb'ers have pretty good success, and hit double digit sakcs. SO not sure wtf every1 is complaining about.

Oh yea, you want us to go back to the days where lb'ers could have 40 sacks a season? NGTH

WTF is wrong with having 40 sacks in a season?

As I've stated before...either push for realism for every position or STFU with your offensively biased bullshit.

Originally posted by Dub J
WTF is wrong with having 40 sacks in a season?

As I've stated before...either push for realism for every position or STFU with your offensively biased bullshit.



in leagues where a guy can rush for 10,000 yards or a guy can return 50 punts for TDs, 40 sacks doesn't seem unrealistic at all

plus as it is now, DEs can get 20+ sacks while blitzing LBs can't

and bring back FFs on sacks while you're at it.

Originally posted by fogie55
in leagues where a guy can rush for 10,000 yards or a guy can return 50 punts for TDs, 40 sacks doesn't seem unrealistic at all

plus as it is now, DEs can get 20+ sacks while blitzing LBs can't

and bring back FFs on sacks while you're at it.

Waiting to see the QB dance around for awhile in the backfield, then run into the butt of their lineman and fumble....
hmmm, who gets credit for the fumble here though?