Originally posted by Plankton
.Originally posted by yello1
But just to reiterate, this goes way beyond the owner's shorts being steamed and is as much or more about the players who are finding seating limited because some damned android has his locker.
This the one part of your argument that I simply do not agree with at all. Whether CPUs were good, bad or ugly, no humans were going to be on my team this season. None were going to be on evileyez's Hellas Hoplites team. We were parking our teams in Reg Pro for different reasons (I know this because I have talked to ee about it), but neither reason would have led us to have human players, regardless of our success or failure this season.
When I demoted Devonport to Regional Pro, it was not to win a trophy. It was because I did not want to give up a team that I have owned for 16 seasons and might decide to start back up. Have I enjoyed having CPU players that actually do what the gameplan says to do? Yes! However, to be clear, CPU player quality did not cost a single human a roster spot on my team or any of the other CPU teams that I have talked with. If they announce that they are adding a Chem hit and increasing the attribute penalty to 30%, I will still trot out my CPU players next season.
Fair enough. But if you and other CPUers continue to have success with it, or even moderate competitiveness, you will see more people doing it and not all of them will just be marking time.
I would think anyway. Human nature being what it is. Its easier, cheaper, and still fun they will think. Its not a difficult task to see how thats going to make more folks try it out.
And I can see the draw in it. But I just dont know if this becoming a "thing" would be good for the game in the long run.
.Originally posted by yello1
But just to reiterate, this goes way beyond the owner's shorts being steamed and is as much or more about the players who are finding seating limited because some damned android has his locker.
This the one part of your argument that I simply do not agree with at all. Whether CPUs were good, bad or ugly, no humans were going to be on my team this season. None were going to be on evileyez's Hellas Hoplites team. We were parking our teams in Reg Pro for different reasons (I know this because I have talked to ee about it), but neither reason would have led us to have human players, regardless of our success or failure this season.
When I demoted Devonport to Regional Pro, it was not to win a trophy. It was because I did not want to give up a team that I have owned for 16 seasons and might decide to start back up. Have I enjoyed having CPU players that actually do what the gameplan says to do? Yes! However, to be clear, CPU player quality did not cost a single human a roster spot on my team or any of the other CPU teams that I have talked with. If they announce that they are adding a Chem hit and increasing the attribute penalty to 30%, I will still trot out my CPU players next season.
Fair enough. But if you and other CPUers continue to have success with it, or even moderate competitiveness, you will see more people doing it and not all of them will just be marking time.
I would think anyway. Human nature being what it is. Its easier, cheaper, and still fun they will think. Its not a difficult task to see how thats going to make more folks try it out.
And I can see the draw in it. But I just dont know if this becoming a "thing" would be good for the game in the long run.






























