We're going 2 shock the shockers! WE WILL SCORE!!!
Killbottom
offline
offline
Originally posted by abdvash
Your conference has Ho Playbook in it...How can we take you seriously
Why are you this butthurt about us. We haven't even played you yet.
Your conference has Ho Playbook in it...How can we take you seriously
Why are you this butthurt about us. We haven't even played you yet.
Freakshow
offline
offline
Originally posted by abdvash
Originally posted by Aogu
Originally posted by Freakshow
Originally posted by Falhawk
you suck
your team sucks
your computer sucks
your monitor probably sucks
(9-1-1) > (8-3)
1st place > 5th place
Win Streak W7 > Win Streak L1
Alika Smith (25 sacks) > Ho Playbook (total sacks for team = 6)
The list could go on but the bottom line is:
Your team sucks and so does your mom apparently.
*Cough*
11-0. Streak W13. The REAL first place. Top QB Passing. I could also go on.
At least we're both better than the Ho
Week 16, the championship game preview?
Your conference has Ho Playbook in it...How can we take you seriously
Aogu, I'm looking forward to our meeting. Looks to be an awesome game (for us I hope) but Vash does have a point.
Originally posted by Aogu
Originally posted by Freakshow
Originally posted by Falhawk
you suck
your team sucks
your computer sucks
your monitor probably sucks
(9-1-1) > (8-3)
1st place > 5th place
Win Streak W7 > Win Streak L1
Alika Smith (25 sacks) > Ho Playbook (total sacks for team = 6)
The list could go on but the bottom line is:
Your team sucks and so does your mom apparently.
*Cough*
11-0. Streak W13. The REAL first place. Top QB Passing. I could also go on.
At least we're both better than the Ho
Week 16, the championship game preview?
Your conference has Ho Playbook in it...How can we take you seriously
Aogu, I'm looking forward to our meeting. Looks to be an awesome game (for us I hope) but Vash does have a point.
Freakshow
offline
offline
Originally posted by Killbottom
No, we're extremely sensitive people with very fragile feelings.
That explains everything, Ho Playbook, you are forgiven. If you ever need someone to share your feelings with, abdvash is a good listener.
No, we're extremely sensitive people with very fragile feelings.
That explains everything, Ho Playbook, you are forgiven. If you ever need someone to share your feelings with, abdvash is a good listener.
abdvash
offline
offline
Originally posted by Freakshow
Originally posted by Killbottom
No, we're extremely sensitive people with very fragile feelings.
That explains everything, Ho Playbook, you are forgiven. If you ever need someone to share your feelings with, abdvash is a good listener.
And Freakshow is a good taker so if ever you need buttsex give him a call.
Originally posted by Killbottom
No, we're extremely sensitive people with very fragile feelings.
That explains everything, Ho Playbook, you are forgiven. If you ever need someone to share your feelings with, abdvash is a good listener.
And Freakshow is a good taker so if ever you need buttsex give him a call.
Freakshow
offline
offline
Originally posted by abdvash
Originally posted by Freakshow
Originally posted by Killbottom
No, we're extremely sensitive people with very fragile feelings.
That explains everything, Ho Playbook, you are forgiven. If you ever need someone to share your feelings with, abdvash is a good listener.
And Freakshow is a good taker so if ever you need buttsex give him a call.
What was that Keanu? You shouldn't talk about buttsex when you love the Keanu ass!
Originally posted by Freakshow
Originally posted by Killbottom
No, we're extremely sensitive people with very fragile feelings.
That explains everything, Ho Playbook, you are forgiven. If you ever need someone to share your feelings with, abdvash is a good listener.
And Freakshow is a good taker so if ever you need buttsex give him a call.
What was that Keanu? You shouldn't talk about buttsex when you love the Keanu ass!
Papa_Bear
offline
offline
lol .... you're all gay. Poop chute debutante's every single last one of you.
Last edited Jul 3, 2008 17:37:48
Papa_Bear
offline
offline
Speaking of gay....
I have two orders of business regarding Ho Playbook. Permit me this forum to rant. A colleague recently informed me that a bunch of predaceous, stentorian apostates and others in Ho Playbook's amen corner are about to popularize a genre of football whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge tendentious, scummy curmudgeons to give voice, in a totally emotional and non-rational way, to Ho Playbook's deep-rooted love of particularism. I have no reason to doubt that story because Ho Playbook demands obeisance from its operatives. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Ho Playbook forces them to dismantle national civil rights organizations by driving a wedge between the leaders and the rank-and-file members.
Fortunately, if you ever get into an argument with some of Ho Playbook's shills about whether or not the truths that I've been rubbing in the faces of quixotic, ultra-shiftless desperados -- truths that they undeniably don't want to see -- are in fact truths, I have an excellent sockdolager for you. Simply inform the other party that Ho Playbook occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to help postmodernist fugitives evade capture by the authorities. Ho Playbook invents problems in order to provide itself with an excuse for making a fuss. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to suppress all news that portrays it in a bad light. That's just not true.
While I don't question Ho Playbook's motives, and I certainly understand the frustrations of its trained seals, I am truly at a loss for words when it asserts that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. It can't possibly be serious. I, for one, suspect that the real story here is that Ho Playbook simply wants to win at all costs the war against our individualism and our liberties. Well, that's another story. To get back to my main point, I ought to mention that if you think you can escape from Ho Playbook's querulous memoirs, then good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that a central fault line runs through each of its plaints. Specifically, I have no idea why it makes such a big fuss over Marxism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved -- issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that I've tried to explain to Ho Playbook's disagreeable apostles that Ho Playbook thinks there should be a law prohibiting people from saying any harsh or unkind things against it. As could be expected, they were a bit slow on the uptake. I just couldn't get them to comprehend that there is no excuse for the innumerable errors of fact, the slovenly and philistine artistic judgments, the historical ineptitude, the internal contradictions, and the various half-truths, untruths, and gussied-up truths that litter every one of Ho Playbook's essays from the first word to the last. Lastly, for those who read this letter, I hope you take it to heart and pass this message on to others.
I have two orders of business regarding Ho Playbook. Permit me this forum to rant. A colleague recently informed me that a bunch of predaceous, stentorian apostates and others in Ho Playbook's amen corner are about to popularize a genre of football whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge tendentious, scummy curmudgeons to give voice, in a totally emotional and non-rational way, to Ho Playbook's deep-rooted love of particularism. I have no reason to doubt that story because Ho Playbook demands obeisance from its operatives. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Ho Playbook forces them to dismantle national civil rights organizations by driving a wedge between the leaders and the rank-and-file members.
Fortunately, if you ever get into an argument with some of Ho Playbook's shills about whether or not the truths that I've been rubbing in the faces of quixotic, ultra-shiftless desperados -- truths that they undeniably don't want to see -- are in fact truths, I have an excellent sockdolager for you. Simply inform the other party that Ho Playbook occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to help postmodernist fugitives evade capture by the authorities. Ho Playbook invents problems in order to provide itself with an excuse for making a fuss. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to suppress all news that portrays it in a bad light. That's just not true.
While I don't question Ho Playbook's motives, and I certainly understand the frustrations of its trained seals, I am truly at a loss for words when it asserts that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. It can't possibly be serious. I, for one, suspect that the real story here is that Ho Playbook simply wants to win at all costs the war against our individualism and our liberties. Well, that's another story. To get back to my main point, I ought to mention that if you think you can escape from Ho Playbook's querulous memoirs, then good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that a central fault line runs through each of its plaints. Specifically, I have no idea why it makes such a big fuss over Marxism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved -- issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that I've tried to explain to Ho Playbook's disagreeable apostles that Ho Playbook thinks there should be a law prohibiting people from saying any harsh or unkind things against it. As could be expected, they were a bit slow on the uptake. I just couldn't get them to comprehend that there is no excuse for the innumerable errors of fact, the slovenly and philistine artistic judgments, the historical ineptitude, the internal contradictions, and the various half-truths, untruths, and gussied-up truths that litter every one of Ho Playbook's essays from the first word to the last. Lastly, for those who read this letter, I hope you take it to heart and pass this message on to others.
Killbottom
offline
offline
Originally posted by Papa_Bear
Speaking of gay....
I have two orders of business regarding Ho Playbook. Permit me this forum to rant. A colleague recently informed me that a bunch of predaceous, stentorian apostates and others in Ho Playbook's amen corner are about to popularize a genre of football whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge tendentious, scummy curmudgeons to give voice, in a totally emotional and non-rational way, to Ho Playbook's deep-rooted love of particularism. I have no reason to doubt that story because Ho Playbook demands obeisance from its operatives. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Ho Playbook forces them to dismantle national civil rights organizations by driving a wedge between the leaders and the rank-and-file members.
Fortunately, if you ever get into an argument with some of Ho Playbook's shills about whether or not the truths that I've been rubbing in the faces of quixotic, ultra-shiftless desperados -- truths that they undeniably don't want to see -- are in fact truths, I have an excellent sockdolager for you. Simply inform the other party that Ho Playbook occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to help postmodernist fugitives evade capture by the authorities. Ho Playbook invents problems in order to provide itself with an excuse for making a fuss. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to suppress all news that portrays it in a bad light. That's just not true.
While I don't question Ho Playbook's motives, and I certainly understand the frustrations of its trained seals, I am truly at a loss for words when it asserts that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. It can't possibly be serious. I, for one, suspect that the real story here is that Ho Playbook simply wants to win at all costs the war against our individualism and our liberties. Well, that's another story. To get back to my main point, I ought to mention that if you think you can escape from Ho Playbook's querulous memoirs, then good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that a central fault line runs through each of its plaints. Specifically, I have no idea why it makes such a big fuss over Marxism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved -- issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that I've tried to explain to Ho Playbook's disagreeable apostles that Ho Playbook thinks there should be a law prohibiting people from saying any harsh or unkind things against it. As could be expected, they were a bit slow on the uptake. I just couldn't get them to comprehend that there is no excuse for the innumerable errors of fact, the slovenly and philistine artistic judgments, the historical ineptitude, the internal contradictions, and the various half-truths, untruths, and gussied-up truths that litter every one of Ho Playbook's essays from the first word to the last. Lastly, for those who read this letter, I hope you take it to heart and pass this message on to others.
butts
Speaking of gay....
I have two orders of business regarding Ho Playbook. Permit me this forum to rant. A colleague recently informed me that a bunch of predaceous, stentorian apostates and others in Ho Playbook's amen corner are about to popularize a genre of football whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge tendentious, scummy curmudgeons to give voice, in a totally emotional and non-rational way, to Ho Playbook's deep-rooted love of particularism. I have no reason to doubt that story because Ho Playbook demands obeisance from its operatives. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Ho Playbook forces them to dismantle national civil rights organizations by driving a wedge between the leaders and the rank-and-file members.
Fortunately, if you ever get into an argument with some of Ho Playbook's shills about whether or not the truths that I've been rubbing in the faces of quixotic, ultra-shiftless desperados -- truths that they undeniably don't want to see -- are in fact truths, I have an excellent sockdolager for you. Simply inform the other party that Ho Playbook occasionally shows what appears to be warmth, joy, love, or compassion. You should realize, however, that these positive expressions are more feigned than experienced and invariably serve an ulterior motive, such as to help postmodernist fugitives evade capture by the authorities. Ho Playbook invents problems in order to provide itself with an excuse for making a fuss. So don't feed me any phony baloney about how the best way to reduce cognitive dissonance and restore homeostasis to one's psyche is to suppress all news that portrays it in a bad light. That's just not true.
While I don't question Ho Playbook's motives, and I certainly understand the frustrations of its trained seals, I am truly at a loss for words when it asserts that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. It can't possibly be serious. I, for one, suspect that the real story here is that Ho Playbook simply wants to win at all costs the war against our individualism and our liberties. Well, that's another story. To get back to my main point, I ought to mention that if you think you can escape from Ho Playbook's querulous memoirs, then good-bye and good luck. To the rest of you I suggest that a central fault line runs through each of its plaints. Specifically, I have no idea why it makes such a big fuss over Marxism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved -- issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that I've tried to explain to Ho Playbook's disagreeable apostles that Ho Playbook thinks there should be a law prohibiting people from saying any harsh or unkind things against it. As could be expected, they were a bit slow on the uptake. I just couldn't get them to comprehend that there is no excuse for the innumerable errors of fact, the slovenly and philistine artistic judgments, the historical ineptitude, the internal contradictions, and the various half-truths, untruths, and gussied-up truths that litter every one of Ho Playbook's essays from the first word to the last. Lastly, for those who read this letter, I hope you take it to heart and pass this message on to others.
butts
confidential
offline
offline
Voilą! In view, a humble vaudevillian veteran, cast vicariously as both victim and villain by the vicissitudes of Fate. This visage, no mere veneer of vanity, is a vestige of the vox populi, now vacant, vanished. However, this valorous visitation of a by-gone vexation, stands vivified and has vowed to vanquish these venal and virulent vermin van-guarding vice and vouchsafing the violently vicious and voracious violation of volition. The only verdict is vengeance; a vendetta, held as a votive, not in vain, for the value and veracity of such shall one day vindicate the vigilant and the virtuous. Verily, this vichyssoise of verbiage veers most verbose, so let me simply add that it's my very good honor to meet you and you may call me V.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
