User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pacific Pro League > Oceania Conference > Brisbane Bandits caught up in controversy? Season tarnished? Possible collusion?
Page:
 
Ballbright
offline
Link
 
I have players on 2 teams in this league. So I do have something at stake here, I would never try to hide that.

--and if you think my call for the Bandits cutting the player they traded for at first opportunity and recusing themselves for the playoffs is motivated by that, I say to you I will gladly have my two players (the only punter on Canberra's roster, and the starting KR/PR/reserve corner) removed from the depth charts for the entirety of the playoffs as proof that this is about the issue at hand, and not some misbegotten attempt to give a team I'm on an advantage.
 
billyvassi
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by BigD123
And here I was so happy spygate was over, now I'm getting it on GLB.

Who gives a shit. By the looks of it they were going to run away with Alpha anyway, and then lose to the Zeta representative in the finals, and thats how its going to be now.

Who cares.


It is a little ironic that we're playing New England tomorrow
 
Ballbright
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Amerifunk
The words 'collusion' and 'cheating' would never have been brought up in this thread if the Bandits weren't undefeated . . .

Just sayin'.


Absolutely untrue. It was brought up in another thread originally that had several teams that were in last, nice try though trying to spin the discussion away from the issue...
 
joemalaka
offline
Link
 
Here is my first PM to catspaw...no threats. (for some reason if I try to post both my and catspaw PM together the website timesout...too large of post??)
----------------------------------------------------

REMOVED per told I cannot.

Catspaw said I could, though, in his PM.
Last edited May 22, 2008 12:36:37
 
BigD123
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by billyvassi
Originally posted by BigD123

And here I was so happy spygate was over, now I'm getting it on GLB.

Who gives a shit. By the looks of it they were going to run away with Alpha anyway, and then lose to the Zeta representative in the finals, and thats how its going to be now.

Who cares.


It is a little ironic that we're playing New England tomorrow


Whenever I read New England Burning Pride I see New England Flaming Homosexuals.

Its not even that I don't like them, its just burning=flaming and when I hear pride I think homosexual.

So if they beat you that means you lost to flaming homosexuals.
 
Ballbright
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by joemalaka
Here is my first PM to catspaw...no threats. (for some reason if I try to post both my and catspaw PM together the website timesout...too large of post??)
----------------------------------------------------

---------- Original message ----------
From: joemalaka
Date: May 21, 2008 14:51:51
Subject: Banned from the private forum???
To: catspaw27

Did I get banned from the forum for what I posted about BillyVassi? I thought the team should know what he did, as I think I think trusting and knowing is a good thing. I personally think what the guy did was very bad, as he gutted a team (inactive owner or not) and left some players not traded on an even crappier team. Just my opinion.

I understand if you feel differently about the guy, but banned?


as much as I would like them to be aired publicly, it is against forum rules to post PMs you should edit them out immediately.
 
badkarma
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Ballbright
Excuse me you fucking moron?


Is that a question mark or did you mean to call me a fucking moron? Next time you call someone a moron try not to come off like such a dunce.

Originally posted by Ballbright
The guy did the right thing...sending your whole team in here to try to discredit him (as you're doing now) is pathetic. Billy and catspaw are the only two that are required to defend their positions.


So we cant come in here and defend billy and cats but you are allowed to run around unchecked screaming conspiracy? I think not.

Originally posted by Ballbright
As far aas my "collusion logic and rhetoric" mine is sound, and by definition the bandits are wrong in this.


Maybe in your mind it is, but I would imagine you have all kinds of irrational thoughts running through that head that most normal people cannot relate to.

I think you have posted enough in this thread, get back to the kiddy table and let the adults talk it out.

 
joemalaka
offline
Link
 
Catspaw response (going to have to be two posts..for some reason still timing out). He is the one that said I would be special teams only.
--------------------------------------

REMOVED...see above.
Last edited May 22, 2008 12:36:52
 
joemalaka
offline
Link
 
2nd part of catspaws first response.
---------------

REMOVED...SEE ABOVE
Last edited May 22, 2008 12:37:10
 
methomps
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Ballbright
I have players on 2 teams in this league. So I do have something at stake here, I would never try to hide that.

--and if you think my call for the Bandits cutting the player they traded for at first opportunity and recusing themselves for the playoffs is motivated by that, I say to you I will gladly have my two players (the only punter on Canberra's roster, and the starting KR/PR/reserve corner) removed from the depth charts for the entirety of the playoffs as proof that this is about the issue at hand, and not some misbegotten attempt to give a team I'm on an advantage.


I don't care either way because your motive isn't all that important if your message isn't persuasive. But you immediately challenged Drifter's credibility (and if you search through the forums you will see that he is a pretty reasonable and well-respected poster) and really the credibility of everyone on the team who might come to this thread and comment. I just found it funny that I would then click on your profile and see that you have two players on the team directly below us in the standings.

Again, another charge that you are way too quick to throw out there.
 
joemalaka
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by methomps
I am a Bandit and here are my initial thoughts. First, as to Ballbright's charge that my opinion is tainted by the fact that I am on the team, I guess the same could be said of his opinion since he has two players on the team directly below us in the conference. I guess the only other option is to consider the responses. Ballbright is practically carrying the charge against Brisbane in this thread with 15 posts all hardline against Brisbane. You will see that I, on the other hand, disagree with some things Cats did and disagree with most of the charges.

While I will assume that joemalaka had an innocent purpose in posting the thread in the team forum, the truth is that it was mostly unrelated to the team. Billyvassi is not a GM for Brisbane. He simply has one player on the team. I think what he did to the other team was gutting and was wrong.

While I think banning joemalaka from the forum may have been a bit of an overreaction, I know it certainly isn't unheard of and I believe it resulted more from anger at introducing a distraction to the team forum than as part of any kind of conspiracy. Catspaw works very hard on the team, especially on having an active and involved group of players. I think he saw this thread a chance for nothing good to happen. And since we had a situation in the past where a disgruntled player (on his way out the door) shared our gameplan with the opposing team, I support his position that joemalaka simply can't be brought back into the forum.

But to go from an overreaction to cries of collusion is pretty silly. Given the fact that you don't even know what all went on with the trade, I find it especially curious that you have so quickly and firmly taken such a strong stance. But I'll assume it isn't due to a conflict of interest w/r/t you being on the 2nd place team in our conference.

Ballbright I believe made an analogy to bank robberies, which is a poor one. Collusion is nothing like bank robbery because collusion involves normal activity (trading) that is subtly influenced against the spirit of the market. Collusion is determined by judgment, not by a clear rule. If you use force to get a bank teller to give you money, that is bank robbery - a clear rule. You often prove collusion through a series of acts that, taken together, suggest something is fishy.

This is one trade of a backup, inactive lvl 12 RB to acquire a backup lvl 12 CB. It is a good deal for Brisbane, but it is the exact same deal that every other team got trading with billvassi. In fact, if you look at the roster of that now-gutted team, it's pretty easy to say that this probably wasn't even in the top 10 in terms of favorable deals:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/roster.pl?team_id=702

Cheating is a pretty serious charge, and I hope that some people would be a little more reserved in their accusations.


I never asked to be brought back to the forum. Immediately after banning I PM'ed Catspaw asking why, stating why I wrote the post....apologized if he didn't appreciate it. He didn't PM me first stating...I had to PM him. His response was an attack saying I was on special teams only. Catspaw did not try to work it out. As you stated my post was not an attack, maybe just stupid.

Overreaction big time. And looking at it, come on...with the trades that happened, does it not look like there is a reason for the overreaction?
 
Ballbright
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by badkarma
Originally posted by Ballbright

Excuse me you fucking moron?


Is that a question mark or did you mean to call me a fucking moron? Next time you call someone a moron try not to come off like such a dunce.

Originally posted by Ballbright

The guy did the right thing...sending your whole team in here to try to discredit him (as you're doing now) is pathetic. Billy and catspaw are the only two that are required to defend their positions.


So we cant come in here and defend billy and cats but you are allowed to run around unchecked screaming conspiracy? I think not.


Originally posted by Ballbright

As far aas my "collusion logic and rhetoric" mine is sound, and by definition the bandits are wrong in this.


Maybe in your mind it is, but I would imagine you have all kinds of irrational thoughts running through that head that most normal people cannot relate to.

I think you have posted enough in this thread, get back to the kiddy table and let the adults talk it out.



OK buddy, you want to push buttons? I'll play your stupid game.

Originally posted by
Is that a question mark or did you mean to call me a fucking moron? Next time you call someone a moron try not to come off like such a dunce.


Yes, it is a question mark. Congratulations some of second grade English sunk in. Since what I was asking was a question, or quizzical in nature, and the insult was still a part of the original puzzlement, a question mark is the appropriate punctuation mark at the end of that sentence. If you had really wanted to turn this int a grammar debate, you should have pointed out the missing comma after "excuse me." Please refrain from trying to correct me in the future, as I will embarrass you, you idiot.

Originally posted by
So we cant come in here and defend billy and cats but you are allowed to run around unchecked screaming conspiracy? I think not.


You're not defending, you're trying to paint Joe out to be some fringe lunatic, rather than the honest guy he is. Besides, Billy and Cats don't seem to be defending themselves...why would they need your help anyway? You can't even recognize third grade grammar errors...

Originally posted by
Maybe in your mind it is, but I would imagine you have all kinds of irrational thoughts running through that head that most normal people cannot relate to.

I think you have posted enough in this thread, get back to the kiddy table and let the adults talk it out.


You have proven yourself to be far inferior to me in both knowledge and intellect, so to make wild statements like that, is slightly amusing to those of us who know you aren't remotely in our league.

Please refrain from replying to me in the future, so I won't have to embarrass you in front of your team again.



Last edited May 22, 2008 12:43:18
 
joemalaka
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by methomps
Originally posted by Ballbright

I have players on 2 teams in this league. So I do have something at stake here, I would never try to hide that.

--and if you think my call for the Bandits cutting the player they traded for at first opportunity and recusing themselves for the playoffs is motivated by that, I say to you I will gladly have my two players (the only punter on Canberra's roster, and the starting KR/PR/reserve corner) removed from the depth charts for the entirety of the playoffs as proof that this is about the issue at hand, and not some misbegotten attempt to give a team I'm on an advantage.


I don't care either way because your motive isn't all that important if your message isn't persuasive. But you immediately challenged Drifter's credibility (and if you search through the forums you will see that he is a pretty reasonable and well-respected poster) and really the credibility of everyone on the team who might come to this thread and comment. I just found it funny that I would then click on your profile and see that you have two players on the team directly below us in the standings.

Again, another charge that you are way too quick to throw out there.


Drifter attacked my credibility without any facts. I posted a factual timeline. Drifter decided to not look at it and attack mine...taking someone else on their word.

Why is one wrong and one right?
 
DaSaintFan
offline
Link
 
Reading this.. I'm seeing some good/bad on both sides of this argument..

Originally posted by
The truth is:

--Billy stripped a team of its players without permission. Ability to do something (as a GM) is not permission. I have the ability to beat my dog anytime I want, but I'm willing to bet even without his saying so, that I don't have his permission.
- REALLY Bad move by the GM.

Originally posted by
--Billy traded some of those players (without placing them on the free market) to teams he is on.
- If Mr. Valli's not the GM/owner of the Bandits, then the Bandits got no reason to be a target here. He may have made the offer to the Bandits, but they didnt' have to accept if there were questions in the trade (which at the time of the trade, it seems there weren't). If they knew that the trade wasn't supposed to happen, then there'd be an argument saying the Bandits "took advantage" of the situation.

Originally posted by
--The team in question here traded an inactive player, who has been inactive almost the entire season, for high level active players to the betterment of their team.
- Can't blame the Bandits here.. they want active players for their team. If it wasn't known that the GM were gutting a team, then it's just a trade-for-a-trade.

Originally posted by
--When a player from the Bandits tried to question it, they banned him from their forum.
- Assuming there were no "nasty" wordings, then this would be (IMO) a bad move by the Bandits.

Originally posted by
--That player took the allegations public as a retort.
- Questionable move at best...

Originally posted by
--Billy has attempted to lie and spin the trade as "fair" because the HB was a lvl 12 (even though he has been inactive all season).
- Again, see above.. if the Bandits were unaware of the "gutting" process then the Bandits owner and GMs wouldn't have a reason to question the trade.

Originally posted by
--Bandits team is now attempting to discredit the player who outed them, because they don't like being busted...
- No choice but to defend themselves here.. but they have to prove they didn't know about the gutting (IMO).

Originally posted by
--Bandit's players are attempting to downplay the significance by various methods including saying it was only one player (a lie), it has minimal impact, people who bring this up are jealous (chip on shoulder nonsense), etc.
- Players defending their own team, fine... but there comments are strictly that.. comments (unless they were ALL aware of the situation, which I doubt).

 
Ballbright
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by methomps
Originally posted by Ballbright

I have players on 2 teams in this league. So I do have something at stake here, I would never try to hide that.

--and if you think my call for the Bandits cutting the player they traded for at first opportunity and recusing themselves for the playoffs is motivated by that, I say to you I will gladly have my two players (the only punter on Canberra's roster, and the starting KR/PR/reserve corner) removed from the depth charts for the entirety of the playoffs as proof that this is about the issue at hand, and not some misbegotten attempt to give a team I'm on an advantage.


I don't care either way because your motive isn't all that important if your message isn't persuasive. But you immediately challenged Drifter's credibility (and if you search through the forums you will see that he is a pretty reasonable and well-respected poster) and really the credibility of everyone on the team who might come to this thread and comment. I just found it funny that I would then click on your profile and see that you have two players on the team directly below us in the standings.

Again, another charge that you are way too quick to throw out there.


Why would you be surprised. I have players on a team in your conference, and own a team in the other. I'd say I have a vested interest, and would be more surprised if people like myself didn't speak out.

You're obviously late coming to this, as the reason I am so pissed is that Billy either lied, or outright misrepresented himself several times in the original thread, and I was defending him (and there I had noted that I had players on the team directly below his).

I'm not throwing charges out there, they've been proven by Billy and Cats own posts in this thread.

By definition Billy colluded. That is cheating.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.