Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Mob-6
Maybe the QB, not the WR.

i would think both ...

how will the wr be able to change his route to something benefitial with low vision?
wouldnt creative routes require the wr to first be able to read the coverage, then make a change within a split second?

Originally posted by Granted86
Originally posted by Mob-6

Maybe the QB, not the WR.

i would think both ...

how will the wr be able to change his route to something benefitial with low vision?
wouldnt creative routes require the wr to first be able to read the coverage, then make a change within a split second?





This is not real life, WRs do not read the coverage in GLB.

Originally posted by Viscount
Originally posted by Granted86

Originally posted by Mob-6


Maybe the QB, not the WR.

i would think both ...

how will the wr be able to change his route to something benefitial with low vision?
wouldnt creative routes require the wr to first be able to read the coverage, then make a change within a split second?





This is not real life, WRs do not read the coverage in GLB.


im jus trying to understand it myself ... how would the wr kno what route to adjust to then?

Originally posted by Granted86
Originally posted by Viscount

Originally posted by Granted86


Originally posted by Mob-6



Maybe the QB, not the WR.

i would think both ...

how will the wr be able to change his route to something benefitial with low vision?
wouldnt creative routes require the wr to first be able to read the coverage, then make a change within a split second?



This is not real life, WRs do not read the coverage in GLB.

im jus trying to understand it myself ... how would the wr kno what route to adjust to then?


They don't need to know, it's the defender who has to use their vision to adjust to whatever route the WR takes.

ive seen alot of wr's that look "lost" when running creative routes, sometimes running into the "D" i/o away from it ... creative gives unlimited options to the wr , but they have to make the right decision to be effective doing it dont they?

Dude, just quit it. Until Bort states that you need vision to run creative routes, you don't need vision for creative routes. The setting on the tactics bar and Bort have both stated that agility is the key to creative. Your speculating about something that doesn't exist.

Originally posted by Mob-6
Dude, just quit it. Until Bort states that you need vision to run creative routes, you don't need vision for creative routes. The setting on the tactics bar and Bort have both stated that agility is the key to creative. Your speculating about something that doesn't exist.

He builds corners. Maybe it's his tactics to make WRs worse-spreading bad info.

Originally posted by Mob-6
Dude, just quit it. Until Bort states that you need vision to run creative routes, you don't need vision for creative routes. The setting on the tactics bar and Bort have both stated that agility is the key to creative. Your speculating about something that doesn't exist.

Originally posted by Granted86
ive seen alot of wr's that look "lost" when running creative routes, sometimes running into the "D" i/o away from it ... creative gives unlimited options to the wr , but they have to make the right decision to be effective doing it dont they?


what wrong info am i spreading? please read before u post u idiot ...

im ASKING because it seems LOGICAL, kinda like how a marvin harrison or tory holt can change their route if need be because of their high field awareness

Originally posted by Granted86


im ASKING because it seems LOGICAL, kinda like how a marvin harrison or tory holt can change their route if need be because of their high field awareness

Well unfortunately, logic doesn't always apply in GLB.

Originally posted by Viscount
Originally posted by Granted86



im ASKING because it seems LOGICAL, kinda like how a marvin harrison or tory holt can change their route if need be because of their high field awareness

Well unfortunately, logic doesn't always apply in GLB.


definately understandable, thx for anwsering my QUESTIONS viscount

Originally posted by Granted86

what wrong info am i spreading? please read before u post u idiot ...


You seemed to be insisting there was something else involved in creative route run after Visc. had twice told you that vision doesn't matter for that. Third time was the charm.

Originally posted by Mob-6
Originally posted by Granted86


what wrong info am i spreading? please read before u post u idiot ...


You seemed to be insisting there was something else involved in creative route run after Visc. had twice told you that vision doesn't matter for that. Third time was the charm.

just incase u didnt know a question mark at the end of a sentence means a question
is being asked

was the thought that vision could help a wr while running creative routes really that unreasonable?

fyi ... im asking a question right now, just making sure u dont mix it up AGAIN

Edited: to be nice

Originally posted by Granted86


just incase u didnt know a question mark at the end of a sentence means a question
is being asked

was the thought that vision could help a wr while running creative routes really that unreasonable?

Edited: to be nice

No, the question wasn't unreasonable, but your reading comprehension was. Your question was answered three times, why did it take you until your third time to process what was being told?

Back to the topic of creative route running.

Now what about the question of high agility, does anyone think agility higher than speed will have an even greater affect?

Originally posted by Absolut Zero
Back to the topic of creative route running.

Now what about the question of high agility, does anyone think agility higher than speed will have an even greater affect?

I don't think speed plays any role in it.