Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Byrney
Is the second tiebreaker really points scored rather than point differential?

That's my understanding....I swear I saw something "offical" posted about it, but haven't been able to locate it lately. So I could just be off my rocker and talking out of my backside....

Get back on your rocker, PAC!! I never gave you permission to leave!

Posted by Bort:

May 9, 2008 17:19:17Quote

No, it's H2H, followed by points scored, followed by points allowed

Originally posted by BDizzle80
Get back on your rocker, PAC!! I never gave you permission to leave!

Shut your piehole.

Originally posted by diro
Posted by Bort:

May 9, 2008 17:19:17Quote

No, it's H2H, followed by points scored, followed by points allowed

Excellent Diro...thanks!

Good luck today Regulators.

ReRe

You too Restatus, going to be a good one.... you guys are one of my favorite teams for your name alone, guess we'll find out who is the quickest draw in BBB #10 tonight

Originally posted by PACharger
Originally posted by TenTwo

read beerbaron's whole post...why does a good offense equal a higher ranking...(and) not a good defense? Isn't defense just as much a part of winning as offense? (PLEASE ANSWER THIS)...The current tie-breaker is flawed in that respect.

The tie breakers go:

Head to head
Points scored
Points allowed

edit -(thank you Captain Obvious, I think we figured that out)

So it does factor in. Just because it's not in the order you or someone else wants, does not mean it's wrong.

It's like I'm talking to my brother's kids. This has nothing to do with what I want. I don't care who or where we play. I also didn't say it was wrong. It is flawed. The most fair way is the NFL way. That is my opinion. The reason its flawed, in case you are still lost, is in my and Beerbaron's posts.

Originally posted by TenTwo
It's like I'm talking to my brother's kids. This has nothing to do with what I want. I don't care who or where we play. I also didn't say it was wrong. It is flawed. The most fair way is the NFL way. That is my opinion. The reason its flawed, in case you are still lost, is in my and Beerbaron's posts.

You provided absolutely nothing of relevancy in your post...you just said: "yea what beerbaron posted"

Are you going to code that? No? Then STFU, stop your whining, and deal with it like the rest of the gaming community. OR go petition Bort with the information, and provide him the easiest way that he could implement it. THAT would be helping, not pointing at someone elses work and say "yea I thought that too".

Then, go crawl back in that hole you have been hiding in for the past week or so. It's a much more pleasant place here without you, OneTwo.

Originally posted by TenTwo
Originally posted by PACharger

Originally posted by TenTwo


read beerbaron's whole post...why does a good offense equal a higher ranking...(and) not a good defense? Isn't defense just as much a part of winning as offense? (PLEASE ANSWER THIS)...The current tie-breaker is flawed in that respect.

The tie breakers go:

Head to head
Points scored
Points allowed

edit -(thank you Captain Obvious, I think we figured that out)

So it does factor in. Just because it's not in the order you or someone else wants, does not mean it's wrong.

It's like I'm talking to my brother's kids. This has nothing to do with what I want. I don't care who or where we play. I also didn't say it was wrong. It is flawed. The most fair way is the NFL way. That is my opinion. The reason its flawed, in case you are still lost, is in my and Beerbaron's posts.

I agree but could understand why Bort has not put more time into this area, yet.

Originally posted by PACharger
Originally posted by TenTwo

It's like I'm talking to my brother's kids. This has nothing to do with what I want. I don't care who or where we play. I also didn't say it was wrong. It is flawed. The most fair way is the NFL way. That is my opinion. The reason its flawed, in case you are still lost, is in my and Beerbaron's posts.

You provided absolutely nothing of relevancy in your post...you just said: "yea what beerbaron posted"

Are you going to code that? No? Then STFU, stop your whining, and deal with it like the rest of the gaming community. OR go petition Bort with the information, and provide him the easiest way that he could implement it. THAT would be helping, not pointing at someone elses work and say "yea I thought that too".

Then, go crawl back in that hole you have been hiding in for the past week or so. It's a much more pleasant place here without you, OneTwo.

Wow, harsh.

Also, on a related note, PWN3D!!!

My name is ESO2008, and I approve this message:

Originally posted by grooveskipinc
I want you all to know that I love you.

It's quiet in here...almost TOO quiet...

Everyone is gearing up for their games.

What do you do to "gear up". Its a simulation. Do you play Rocky music?

BDizzle drinks 17 Jolt sodas and comes to the forums to stir up shit.

I noticed no one was brave enough for predictions.