User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Suggestions > Epic Suggestions > Veteran Abilities Suggestion Thread
Page:
 
5STAR
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mat McBriar
Suggestions forum being bypassed for sake of thread getting more attention ftl.


thanks for moving to suggestions forum so no one will see it

Guess this thread does not meet your approval unlike the other suggestion threads left in the main forum

Mods moving threads they do not agree with but allowing others they do ftl
 
ElvisTCB
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Iron Maiden
Would be better if you were able to cut down (dramatically) a WR's ability to catch the ball in double / triple coverage. Also, raise the interception %.


the problem a lot of people are having with this season's sim is WRs not catching the ball. QB completion percentages, against SIMILAR level opponents is horrible atm.
 
ElvisTCB
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by 5STAR
thanks for moving to suggestions forum so no one will see it

Guess this thread does not meet your approval unlike the other suggestion threads left in the main forum

Mods moving threads they do not agree with but allowing others they do ftl


suggestions is such a popular forum, it will so so much better here O_o
 
InRomoWeTrust
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
I'm scared to what this would do for the good "possession" WRs (although rare in upper leagues, they do exist and they do fine statistically). I didn't move your thread, btw. Last I checked I was still an lolmod, aka I have no moderator powers outside my home forums.
 
5STAR
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mat McBriar
I'm scared to what this would do for the good "possession" WRs (although rare in upper leagues, they do exist and they do fine statistically).


Maybe they would require the defense to plan on passing coverage instead of point n click zone or man

 
InRomoWeTrust
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by 5STAR
Originally posted by Mat McBriar

I'm scared to what this would do for the good "possession" WRs (although rare in upper leagues, they do exist and they do fine statistically).


Maybe they would require the defense to plan on passing coverage instead of point n click zone or man



That's sort of beating around the bush. A 30% increase to jumping/catching/vision is huge and comparatively would probably to make legit coverage non-existent. We would end up w/ players consistently beating double/triple coverage, but by solely "out-rolling" the defenders as opposed to positioning himself or altering his route slightly. That's where a Ball Hawk type VA (current style) needs to come into place. QB/WRs slightly altering routes, throwing where only the receiver can get it, throwing to space, etc.
 
5STAR
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mat McBriar
Originally posted by 5STAR

Originally posted by Mat McBriar


I'm scared to what this would do for the good "possession" WRs (although rare in upper leagues, they do exist and they do fine statistically).


Maybe they would require the defense to plan on passing coverage instead of point n click zone or man



That's sort of beating around the bush. A 30% increase to jumping/catching/vision is huge and comparatively would probably to make legit coverage non-existent. Essentially reflects the below note, we would end up w/ players consistently beating double/triple coverage.

Originally posted by Iron Maiden

Would be better if you were able to cut down (dramatically) a WR's ability to catch the ball in double / triple coverage.




30% would go to the defense also which would give them a better chance to catch the ball also

teams are passing at about a 50% clip right now...so no one is beating double/triple coverage all that much.
 
InRomoWeTrust
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Sort of caught me editing. I just think that's the wrong approach towards "fixing" passing. Increasing roll #'s as opposed to the actual mechanic is a mistake. I'll quote my edited addition from my last post.

Originally posted by Mat McBriar
That's where a Ball Hawk type VA (current style) needs to come into place. QB/WRs slightly altering routes, throwing where only the receiver can get it, throwing to space, etc.


 
5STAR
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mat McBriar
Sort of caught me editing. I just think that's the wrong approach towards "fixing" passing. I'll quote my edited addition from my last post.

Originally posted by Mat McBriar

That's where a Ball Hawk type VA (current style) needs to come into place. QB/WRs slightly altering routes, throwing where only the receiver can get it, throwing to space, etc.




bort has been working on Passing for 13 seasons...maybe he needs a band aid fix like VAs. The same style of fix he used on the defensive line tbh
 
pottsman
offline
Link
 
Because of the move, I think I need to lock this. All new/edited VA suggestions are supposed to go in the existing epic (which is where we got all the new ones that came in this season). I'm going to try to get a merge.

Merged. Thanks SSD.
Edited by pottsman on Dec 15, 2009 10:35:13
 
5STAR
offline
Link
 
lol censorship ftw
 
InRomoWeTrust
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by 5STAR
bort has been working on Passing for 13 seasons...maybe he needs a band aid fix like VAs. The same style of fix he used on the defensive line tbh


Doesn't matter how long it takes to get something "working". VAs are not a crutch, despite how you want them to be perceived. Can't ignore the actual raw mechanic.
Edited by Mat McBriar on Dec 15, 2009 10:34:23
 
ElvisTCB
offline
Link
 
way to screw up another thread.. the dreaded "merge" now you have a wall of text thread in a forum that's not followed a lot by the general population

sweet!!!


*sticks fork in it*
 
ElvisTCB
offline
Link
 
......
Edited by elvistcb on Dec 15, 2009 12:51:14
 
Link
 
Originally posted by pottsman
Because of the move, I think I need to lock this. All new/edited VA suggestions are supposed to go in the existing epic (which is where we got all the new ones that came in this season). I'm going to try to get a merge.

Merged. Thanks SSD.


Would you at least post a link to the other thread since your killing this one.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.