mo money
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > What is the great new idea in GLB2?
bhall43
offline
offline
so by saying you cant screw up but there are different ways to do it. wouldnt everyone end similar? i guess i just dont understand how you cant screw up a build.
bhall43
offline
offline
especially when i look at some of these replays and see guys doing wonky things and you guys saying well the punter needs hands to catch the ball or whatever. am i forced at some point to add hands? will mine and another guys punters end similar despite different paths?
hokegoalie
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
especially when i look at some of these replays and see guys doing wonky things and you guys saying well the punter needs hands to catch the ball or whatever. am i forced at some point to add hands? will mine and another guys punters end similar despite different paths?
Because that never happens in GLB1...even five years later...
especially when i look at some of these replays and see guys doing wonky things and you guys saying well the punter needs hands to catch the ball or whatever. am i forced at some point to add hands? will mine and another guys punters end similar despite different paths?
Because that never happens in GLB1...even five years later...
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by Matty The Drone
So more ways to build like before they forced archtypes on us.........that really took the individuality feeling out of the game once builds got pretty cookie cutter.
So more ways to build like before they forced archtypes on us.........that really took the individuality feeling out of the game once builds got pretty cookie cutter.
hokegoalie
offline
offline
Originally posted by bhall43
because i claimed it doesnt...
So, in the end, there was no need for GLB2?
Agreed brah.
because i claimed it doesnt...
So, in the end, there was no need for GLB2?
Agreed brah.
jdbolick
offline
offline
I think Bort knew GLB didn't turn out to be what he wanted and saw a bunch of people talking about how great it would be if the site started from scratch, but unfortunately I think he got most of the major details wrong in what would actually be appealing.
hokegoalie
offline
offline
Originally posted by jdbolick
I think Bort knew GLB didn't turn out to be what he wanted and saw a bunch of people talking about how great it would be if the site started from scratch, but unfortunately I think he got most of the major details wrong in what would actually be appealing.
But this time, it costs less flex to make players!
He's listening!
I think Bort knew GLB didn't turn out to be what he wanted and saw a bunch of people talking about how great it would be if the site started from scratch, but unfortunately I think he got most of the major details wrong in what would actually be appealing.
But this time, it costs less flex to make players!
He's listening!
Edited by hokegoalie on Sep 25, 2013 16:40:28
Larry Roadgrader
offline
offline
Originally posted by hokegoalie
So, in the end, there was no need for GLB2?
Agreed brah.
I'm not sure why you're still here--you don't like the current game, and you don't like what you've seen of the new game, so....
So, in the end, there was no need for GLB2?
Agreed brah.
I'm not sure why you're still here--you don't like the current game, and you don't like what you've seen of the new game, so....
Larry Roadgrader
offline
offline
Originally posted by Matty The Drone
So more ways to build like before they forced archtypes on us.........that really took the individuality feeling out of the game once builds got pretty cookie cutter.
You couldn't be more wrong. Having only ONE set of major and minors per position in the original game hamstringed builds--there were certain player types you simply couldn't build to have any degree of effectiveness. Archtypes opened things up (even if the additional levels and additional SP that was added with it may not have been a positive).
So more ways to build like before they forced archtypes on us.........that really took the individuality feeling out of the game once builds got pretty cookie cutter.
You couldn't be more wrong. Having only ONE set of major and minors per position in the original game hamstringed builds--there were certain player types you simply couldn't build to have any degree of effectiveness. Archtypes opened things up (even if the additional levels and additional SP that was added with it may not have been a positive).
hokegoalie
offline
offline
Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader
I'm not sure why you're still here--you don't like the current game, and you don't like what you've seen of the new game, so....
I don't like the current game?
I'm glad you are obsessed with me bro. It's kinda cute.
I'm not sure why you're still here--you don't like the current game, and you don't like what you've seen of the new game, so....
I don't like the current game?
I'm glad you are obsessed with me bro. It's kinda cute.
dahman32
offline
offline
Originally posted by hokegoalie
So, in the end, there was no need for GLB2?
Agreed brah.
There was a need, to keep people talking about a game they haven't played yet, most action the site has had in awhile... genius!
Could you imagine if they would have said something about GLB2 when it was ready and nearly out of Beta?
So, in the end, there was no need for GLB2?
Agreed brah.
There was a need, to keep people talking about a game they haven't played yet, most action the site has had in awhile... genius!
Could you imagine if they would have said something about GLB2 when it was ready and nearly out of Beta?
jdbolick
offline
offline
Originally posted by hokegoalie
But this time, it costs less flex to make players!
He's listening!
And less flex return. It amuses me that I was the one to figure out they were doing that.
But this time, it costs less flex to make players!
He's listening!
And less flex return. It amuses me that I was the one to figure out they were doing that.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
