User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Page:
 
Djinnt
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by taurran
It's been authorized for use as illumination over enemy positions. If it falls on them, whatever. That's the way it is.

Nothing about war is pretty. It hurts to get shot, burned, exploded, or eviscerated.


It has been used as an explosive in both Afghanistan and Iraq.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by issacar
http://rt.com/op-edge/us-syria-cia-fabrication-620/

The intelligence gathered against Syria’s Assad was manufactured by elements within the spy community in order to mislead the US President to take punitive action, Ray McGovern, a veteran CIA analyst, told RT.

You do realize that linking from a conspiracy theory website makes you look like an idiot, right? That's like linking from one of those bigfoot sites to prove that bigfoot really exists. There were multiple instances of sarin use by Assad forces already this year, not just one. The latest was simply the biggest and therefore could no longer be ignored. There was also evidence of shell delivery at the scene, something well beyond the capabilities of rebels. The site was then shelled into complete oblivion by Syrian forces in the 24 hours after the attack. Why would Syrian forces be so desperate to destroy all the evidence if they were being set up? Look, I know that I can't convince you because we already know from Dub J's forum that you're an irrational clown who believes in many absurd conspiracy theories, but if you insist on posting your nonsense publicly then I am going to humiliate you.
 
Djinnt
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick

You do realize that linking from a conspiracy theory website makes you look like an idiot, right? That's like linking from one of those bigfoot sites to prove that bigfoot really exists. There were multiple instances of sarin use by Assad forces already this year, not just one. The latest was simply the biggest and therefore could no longer be ignored. There was also evidence of shell delivery at the scene, something well beyond the capabilities of rebels. The site was then shelled into complete oblivion by Syrian forces in the 24 hours after the attack. Why would Syrian forces be so desperate to destroy all the evidence if they were being set up? Look, I know that I can't convince you because we already know from Dub J's forum that you're an irrational clown who believes in many absurd conspiracy theories, but if you insist on posting your nonsense publicly then I am going to humiliate you.


RT is not a conspiracy theory website. Hilarious.
 
issacar
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick

You do realize that linking from a conspiracy theory website makes you look like an idiot, right? That's like linking from one of those bigfoot sites to prove that bigfoot really exists. There were multiple instances of sarin use by Assad forces already this year, not just one. The latest was simply the biggest and therefore could no longer be ignored. There was also evidence of shell delivery at the scene, something well beyond the capabilities of rebels. The site was then shelled into complete oblivion by Syrian forces in the 24 hours after the attack. Why would Syrian forces be so desperate to destroy all the evidence if they were being set up? Look, I know that I can't convince you because we already know from Dub J's forum that you're an irrational clown who believes in many absurd conspiracy theories, but if you insist on posting your nonsense publicly then I am going to humiliate you.


Based on your premise I come up to the conclusion that CNN is also a conspiracy theory media.

It's cool that you say we have evidences but doesn't post any source. You do a good job at humilitaing yourself... keep on going.
 
taurran
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Djinnt
It has been used as an explosive in both Afghanistan and Iraq.


Not likely. It's used in mortar rounds for both illumination and smoke. I've seen it dropped quite a number of times.

It's still not considered NBC (nuclear biological or chemical). I was NBC certified.
 
Link
 
Originally posted by Serenity


Face it, Americans need to wake up and realize they aren't precious little princesses ....



Face it, we're kind of a Big Deal.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader

Well, at times dealing with him is akin to dealing with GLB's very own honorary Special Olympics mod, so...

lol, McBriar just informed me via PM that he was the one who banned me for: http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=4906127&page=1#45433484
 
taurran
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Larry Roadgrader

Face it, we're kind of a Big Deal.


Unlike Canada.

It's painfully obvious the Canadians in this forum are butthurt little whiners, who constantly feel the need to make every single issue into an attempt to slander the US as a nation.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Djinnt
RT is not a conspiracy theory website. Hilarious.

That's exactly what it is. It only posts conspiracy theories.
 
issacar
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by taurran
Unlike Canada.

It's painfully obvious the Canadians in this forum are butthurt little whiners, who constantly feel the need to make every single issue into an attempt to slander the US as a nation.


I hope you aren't putting me in this lot. I feel like slandering the US now based off on this erroneus generalization...
 
taurran
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick

That's exactly what it is. It only posts conspiracy theories.


Only is false.

There's quite a lot on the site that's simply informational.

Do you even realize what the meaning of conspiracy is?
con·spir·a·cy
kənˈspirəsē/
noun
noun: conspiracy; plural noun: conspiracies

1.
a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful.


Everything unlawful is a conspiracy. All it takes is two people having a discussion.
 
issacar
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by jdbolick

That's exactly what it is. It only posts conspiracy theories.


CNN only talks about conspiracy theory too....
 
taurran
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by issacar
I hope you aren't putting me in this lot. I feel like slandering the US now based off on this erroneus generalization...


You're not so bad as the others, but I've seen you do it before.
 
issacar
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by taurran
You're not so bad as the others, but I've seen you do it before.


Yes, in threads started or already derailled by gart, lazer, or Serenity.
 
jdbolick
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by taurran
Only is false.

It's the only thing I see on that site. Regardless of your semantic bullshit, rt.com is clearly in the business of promoting tinfoil theories.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.