In other words, most networks have blended back into the GLB landscape.
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Pro's and Con's a discussion about coalitions in GLB
CowboysAmerica
offline
offline
it certainly does if "you" are actually dead ...... counts double/triple ....
consider the ded peeps who vote as a part of the cobamalition ...
"your vote is counted , even when you're not there" ....
consider the ded peeps who vote as a part of the cobamalition ...
"your vote is counted , even when you're not there" ....
I love my network tbh.
An escape from the 24/7 forum trolls is nice sometimes
An escape from the 24/7 forum trolls is nice sometimes
PatrickStump
offline
offline
Originally posted by Dub J
Some of the reasons I've remained independent...
- I find it to be lulzy for people that had nothing to do with a team's accomplishments to take credit for something they had nothing to do with. How many times have we seen "looks like the <alliance/coalition> has won another gold"?
- I do not want to be a part of a group that associates with people I don't like.
- I take pride in being an independent.
Some of the reasons I've remained independent...
- I find it to be lulzy for people that had nothing to do with a team's accomplishments to take credit for something they had nothing to do with. How many times have we seen "looks like the <alliance/coalition> has won another gold"?
- I do not want to be a part of a group that associates with people I don't like.
- I take pride in being an independent.
Originally posted by Dub J
Some of the reasons I've remained independent...
- I find it to be lulzy for people that had nothing to do with a team's accomplishments to take credit for something they had nothing to do with. How many times have we seen "looks like the <alliance/coalition> has won another gold"?
This is something someone with no experience with networks would say.
Originally posted by Dub J
- I do not want to be a part of a group that associates with people I don't like.
- I take pride in being an independent.
Then that network isn't for you.
Independents get no cares
Some of the reasons I've remained independent...
- I find it to be lulzy for people that had nothing to do with a team's accomplishments to take credit for something they had nothing to do with. How many times have we seen "looks like the <alliance/coalition> has won another gold"?
This is something someone with no experience with networks would say.
Originally posted by Dub J
- I do not want to be a part of a group that associates with people I don't like.
- I take pride in being an independent.
Then that network isn't for you.
Independents get no cares
Originally posted by BadgerPhil
That's like saying people take a dump outside sometimes.
Wait? Sometimes?
That's like saying people take a dump outside sometimes.
Wait? Sometimes?
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by jampysos
This is something someone with no experience with networks would say.
Either you're even more clueless than previously thought or you're failtrolling pretty hard.
This is something someone with no experience with networks would say.
Either you're even more clueless than previously thought or you're failtrolling pretty hard.
Originally posted by Dub J
Either you're even more clueless than previously thought or you're failtrolling pretty hard.
That doesn't make his statement any less correct. For someone who has shown an incredible lack of understanding of how networks work, you sure hate on them often.
Either you're even more clueless than previously thought or you're failtrolling pretty hard.
That doesn't make his statement any less correct. For someone who has shown an incredible lack of understanding of how networks work, you sure hate on them often.
Dub J
offline
offline
I've been invited to several network PFs and read over their stuff before removing myself. Not to mention most of them pretty much lay out everything in public forums while recruiting people to their network.
So try again, failhornfan.
So try again, failhornfan.
Originally posted by Dub J
I've been invited to several network PFs and read over their stuff before removing myself. Not to mention most of them pretty much lay out everything in public forums while recruiting people to their network.
So try again, failhornfan.
I've had dots with or worked with pretty much every elite network in GLB and I've never seen anything of the sort. Every time you try to make a point, all you do is prove more and more how ignorant you are to how networks are actually run.
I've been invited to several network PFs and read over their stuff before removing myself. Not to mention most of them pretty much lay out everything in public forums while recruiting people to their network.
So try again, failhornfan.
I've had dots with or worked with pretty much every elite network in GLB and I've never seen anything of the sort. Every time you try to make a point, all you do is prove more and more how ignorant you are to how networks are actually run.
I mean, at this point all I can conclude is that you are so jealous of the success that some networks have had in the game that you've taken it upon yourself to badmouth them in some deluded attempt to justify your lack of success.
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
I mean, at this point all I can conclude is that you are so jealous of the success that some networks have had in the game that you've taken it upon yourself to badmouth them in some deluded attempt to justify your lack of success.
lol
Name one network I've called out in this thread.
Why don't you drop the pretentious bullshit and stop acting like you give a shit about this thread. You're merely here to attack me because you're butthurt about what I said about the Addicts in another thread. Now that I think of it...didn't they take credit for a team winning WL that they had nothing much to do with?
I mean, at this point all I can conclude is that you are so jealous of the success that some networks have had in the game that you've taken it upon yourself to badmouth them in some deluded attempt to justify your lack of success.
lol
Name one network I've called out in this thread.
Why don't you drop the pretentious bullshit and stop acting like you give a shit about this thread. You're merely here to attack me because you're butthurt about what I said about the Addicts in another thread. Now that I think of it...didn't they take credit for a team winning WL that they had nothing much to do with?
Dub J
offline
offline
Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
I've had dots with or worked with pretty much every elite network in GLB and I've never seen anything of the sort. Every time you try to make a point, all you do is prove more and more how ignorant you are to how networks are actually run.
Ummm...not really all that hard to look at roster pages and home pages to see who's building the dots and coordinating for the teams in a given network. You're reaching really hard to turn this into some super secret 007 shit.
I've had dots with or worked with pretty much every elite network in GLB and I've never seen anything of the sort. Every time you try to make a point, all you do is prove more and more how ignorant you are to how networks are actually run.
Ummm...not really all that hard to look at roster pages and home pages to see who's building the dots and coordinating for the teams in a given network. You're reaching really hard to turn this into some super secret 007 shit.
Originally posted by Dub J
lol
Name one network I've called out in this thread.
Why don't you drop the pretentious bullshit and stop acting like you give a shit about this thread. You're merely here to attack me because you're butthurt about what I said about the Addicts in another thread. Now that I think of it...didn't they take credit for a team winning WL that they had nothing much to do with?
You're right. I don't give a shit about this thread. But I do like pointing it out when someone makes some inanely stupid and completely wrong comment like you've done all throughout this thread and in previous posts you've made about networks. You're in here talking about there not being any more elite networks or that they've blended back into the GLB landscape when most of the competitive playoff teams in WL, pro, and cas pro are network teams. You also have absolutely no understanding about how they work yet you continue to spout off like you do.
Originally posted by Dub J
Ummm...not really all that hard to look at roster pages and home pages to see who's building the dots and coordinating for the teams in a given network. You're reaching really hard to turn this into some super secret 007 shit.
And yet you make a post trying to claim to understand networks because you read through the PFs or recruiting pitches. Most networks don't do that shit and the ones that do tend to be the networks that fail. The top networks consist of a braintrust of coordinators and knowledgeable GLB vets along with a broad base of dot builders who can be trusted to build elite dots with minimal guidance. The best networks don't have build guides or step-by-step plans for what a build should be. A real network will give an idea of what they want and then let the builder have free-reign to get there.
You also fail to understand the value of networking to bring in good agents and the value that a dot can have in the process of working towards a title. An agent might not have a dot on a title winning team, but if they had a dot on the team the season before and that dot helped the team stay in the playoff hunt and be competitive so that the team earns a name for itself then they added value to the network.
Hell, look at doof. I didn't have much any idea of who they were prior to last season. They didn't win gold, but they sure did make a statement. Now I'm more likely to take one of my dots there since I know they can compete (and I'm sure other top builders feel the same). They have dots who were on their team last season that aren't there now or won't be there in the future. But if they name recognition they earned results in more success and a title later, then those agents helped that network and deserve to talk shit if that title is won.
But someone like you who can only think narrowly and short-term couldn't grasp that concept.
lol
Name one network I've called out in this thread.
Why don't you drop the pretentious bullshit and stop acting like you give a shit about this thread. You're merely here to attack me because you're butthurt about what I said about the Addicts in another thread. Now that I think of it...didn't they take credit for a team winning WL that they had nothing much to do with?
You're right. I don't give a shit about this thread. But I do like pointing it out when someone makes some inanely stupid and completely wrong comment like you've done all throughout this thread and in previous posts you've made about networks. You're in here talking about there not being any more elite networks or that they've blended back into the GLB landscape when most of the competitive playoff teams in WL, pro, and cas pro are network teams. You also have absolutely no understanding about how they work yet you continue to spout off like you do.
Originally posted by Dub J
Ummm...not really all that hard to look at roster pages and home pages to see who's building the dots and coordinating for the teams in a given network. You're reaching really hard to turn this into some super secret 007 shit.
And yet you make a post trying to claim to understand networks because you read through the PFs or recruiting pitches. Most networks don't do that shit and the ones that do tend to be the networks that fail. The top networks consist of a braintrust of coordinators and knowledgeable GLB vets along with a broad base of dot builders who can be trusted to build elite dots with minimal guidance. The best networks don't have build guides or step-by-step plans for what a build should be. A real network will give an idea of what they want and then let the builder have free-reign to get there.
You also fail to understand the value of networking to bring in good agents and the value that a dot can have in the process of working towards a title. An agent might not have a dot on a title winning team, but if they had a dot on the team the season before and that dot helped the team stay in the playoff hunt and be competitive so that the team earns a name for itself then they added value to the network.
Hell, look at doof. I didn't have much any idea of who they were prior to last season. They didn't win gold, but they sure did make a statement. Now I'm more likely to take one of my dots there since I know they can compete (and I'm sure other top builders feel the same). They have dots who were on their team last season that aren't there now or won't be there in the future. But if they name recognition they earned results in more success and a title later, then those agents helped that network and deserve to talk shit if that title is won.
But someone like you who can only think narrowly and short-term couldn't grasp that concept.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
