Originally posted by jampysos
Thanks Novus,
but I hope you understand the point I am trying to understand,
as I am not intentionally trying to have a debate,
I just want to understand why/how this huge favor of 1 arch/buildtype is so much more preferred than the other. (Which seems more dominant imo)Hey, it's always good to ask questions, even if they go against the flow of conventional wisdom.

I think what it all comes down to is the simple question of what most people want out of their WR. Super-fast WRs are simple to build (though deceptively difficult to build
correctly -- an important distinction), and even the dumbest OC knows how to use a super-fast WR in their offense. That probably explains the disparity more than anything.
Possession WRs can work, but with much more difficulty... since you can't get their Speed up as high, you have to absolutely
nail the rest of the build. And even then, you also have to find an OC who knows how to correctly use your WR and how to find him some single-coverage short-to-medium routes where he can do his thing. If you end up on a team that just bombs it downfield all game long, your WR is going to struggle, because he's going to be fighting for the ball with 2 or 3 defenders every single time -- maybe more defenders than that, depending on how quickly the rest of the defense can converge on you while the ball is in the air.
And even then, if I want to build somebody for short-to-medium underneath routes, my personal preference is
still gonna be a Speedster so he can use his Speed and Agility to make quick cuts away from his man, though I'd still certainly build him differently than I'd build a downfield threat.
But that's what makes this game so much fun... tryin' this shit out. Only way to know for sure is to build a dot and let 'er rip.

Great thread, jampy.

Really enjoyed this one.