Warrior General Games

Originally posted by mwoods07
Nice 4th Qtr fumble to win the game. GL in WL...turnovers in this game will someday be made where they aren't such an impact.

That's what turnovers are, impacts. Why would that change.

Originally posted by jallowe
That's what turnovers are, impacts. Why would that change.

Because it's RANDOM...and one team could technically get 4-5 and the other team 0...You really think that is ok? In close games with 2 close teams...1 turnover is acceptable...4-5 compared to 0 is not ok....ever. Hell one team could technically get unlimited turnovers and the other get 0...

FF's in certain situations are better than others. blitzing LB's getting a FF is more likely to happen then a CB forcing a fumble on a Power HB.

Let me give a small example.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2000589&pbp_id=10067240

What do you do other than just not use the Weak I formation? This was early in the game, so less likely a turnover. But after a few of these, it's gonna be a turnover. FB was held in on this play. he just runs right past. I could have kept the TE in to block the Weak side, but then all the DC has to do is overload the strongside and it's the same outcome.

Basically, fumbles and interceptions (when not thrown into massive traffic) should be a rarity. As it stands...fumbles and ruin an otherwise good game.

Originally posted by TrevJo
Good luck Fredricton. Or Frederickton. Or Fredericton. w/e

Nice game. Looking forward to watching it after work. GL in the WL! Hope to join u up there next season.

Originally posted by mwoods07
Nice 4th Qtr fumble to win the game. GL in WL...turnovers in this game will someday be made where they aren't such an impact.

Thanks for the GL
Durham was easily first in the conference in fumbles forced this season FWIW

Originally posted by Dacolts
Nice game. Looking forward to watching it after work. GL in the WL! Hope to join u up there next season.

Stressful as hell to watch. I'll second that hope!

Originally posted by MadCow DTD
GG to the 4 teams who lose to Moooooooose Jaw




Villiage Dogs- GG, But lets face it, this just wasnt your year. keep your chin up, maybe next season

Widow Makers/Bulls- The bulls are not very good at all. I mean at all. They are lucky CPL is pretty young. and the widow maker are super Effective but do they know what they are doing? I dont know. Either way, Moosejaw beat the winner of this game. I think the Widow Makers can win this game if they have any clue how to OC or DC. But neither are a match for Moosejaw

Queen City/Teabagger- GG to the winner of this game. because you will easily beat the winner of Queenland/stupid toad name team. But you wont be good enough to keep it close with Moose jaw in the Conference finals. Which sucks for you because you just let the world league slip through your fingers. But its good for me because i still havent had to gameplan because CPL blows


Durham- Finally I get to take my offense off of presets. and I win impressivly. Face it. you went 19-0 because CPL sucks. but you will go 19-1 because you suck that much. try to hold us under 50 so it makes the game watchable. Ill try not to gameplan a ton to also try and make staying under 50 points do-able too.


GG CPL. wont be seeing you for a while



Bump for being awesome

Originally posted by mwoods07
Because it's RANDOM...and one team could technically get 4-5 and the other team 0...You really think that is ok? In close games with 2 close teams...1 turnover is acceptable...4-5 compared to 0 is not ok....ever. Hell one team could technically get unlimited turnovers and the other get 0...

FF's in certain situations are better than others. blitzing LB's getting a FF is more likely to happen then a CB forcing a fumble on a Power HB.

Let me give a small example.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2000589&pbp_id=10067240

What do you do other than just not use the Weak I formation? This was early in the game, so less likely a turnover. But after a few of these, it's gonna be a turnover. FB was held in on this play. he just runs right past. I could have kept the TE in to block the Weak side, but then all the DC has to do is overload the strongside and it's the same outcome.

Basically, fumbles and interceptions (when not thrown into massive traffic) should be a rarity. As it stands...fumbles and ruin an otherwise good game.

Give me a break. You wouldn't even had played the game had your MLB (who had all of 2 FFs all season) not force a fumble against my HB with the one of the highest ELs in the league, 90 carry, anti-fumble gear and several points in coverup....in your previous playoff game. http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1999545&pbp_id=9697186 This game needs more turnovers, not less. And in RL, teams on the same level will turn it over 5 times to nothing in RL. There's nothing wrong with it. It's part of the game, and should be a bigger part IMO.

Originally posted by mwoods07
Because it's RANDOM...and one team could technically get 4-5 and the other team 0...You really think that is ok? In close games with 2 close teams...1 turnover is acceptable...4-5 compared to 0 is not ok....ever. Hell one team could technically get unlimited turnovers and the other get 0...

FF's in certain situations are better than others. blitzing LB's getting a FF is more likely to happen then a CB forcing a fumble on a Power HB.

Let me give a small example.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2000589&pbp_id=10067240

What do you do other than just not use the Weak I formation? This was early in the game, so less likely a turnover. But after a few of these, it's gonna be a turnover. FB was held in on this play. he just runs right past. I could have kept the TE in to block the Weak side, but then all the DC has to do is overload the strongside and it's the same outcome.

Basically, fumbles and interceptions (when not thrown into massive traffic) should be a rarity. As it stands...fumbles and ruin an otherwise good game.

or you could teach the two LBs on your team that missed 10 tackles combined to, well, tackle.

Originally posted by Weather
or you could teach the two LBs on your team that missed 10 tackles combined to, well, tackle.
YOU CANT TEACH DAWTS SILLY

LOLOLOLOL?

Originally posted by T♠2♠
Give me a break. You wouldn't even had played the game had your MLB (who had all of 2 FFs all season) not force a fumble against my HB with the one of the highest ELs in the league, 90 carry, anti-fumble gear and several points in coverup....in your previous playoff game. http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=1999545&pbp_id=9697186 This game needs more turnovers, not less. And in RL, teams on the same level will turn it over 5 times to nothing in RL. There's nothing wrong with it. It's part of the game, and should be a bigger part IMO.

Originally posted by Weather
or you could teach the two LBs on your team that missed 10 tackles combined to, well, tackle.

ok

Originally posted by MadCow DTD
Bump for being awesome

Why don't you sign some more quarterbacks about it?

This thread delivers

Originally posted by mwoods07
Because it's RANDOM...and one team could technically get 4-5 and the other team 0...You really think that is ok? In close games with 2 close teams...1 turnover is acceptable...4-5 compared to 0 is not ok....ever. Hell one team could technically get unlimited turnovers and the other get 0...

Basically, fumbles and interceptions (when not thrown into massive traffic) should be a rarity. As it stands...fumbles and ruin an otherwise good game.

Yes, they are supposed to be random. I don't want to cite RL, but they are random in RL as well. No, they shouldn't be rare, but you try your best to limit them. Turnovers are very frustrating, but they are part of the game.

this thread is pretty nails