User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Private Forum Announcements > Any interest in a No boost, No custom private league?
Page:
 
LordEvil
offline
Link
 
NFC East is the first full division!
 
LordEvil
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Bevo05
I will do a couple players....and make eligible for the draft....go ahead and send invite to private forum


Will add to list. PF invites will be sent out when teams are all claimed.
 
PhunkTalkin
offline
Link
 
I will make some players for the draft also.
 
zmj44
offline
Link
 
How about all draft players have college names??

And anybody interested in making this a 40 man roster limit?
Just so you dont have to keep up with too many players
Edited by zmj44 on Nov 27, 2011 15:16:05
 
Rizyx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by zmj44
How about all draft players have college names??

And anybody interested in making this a 40 man roster limit?
Just so you dont have to keep up with too many players


maybe have CPU only ST?

we all know how ST's are kinda messed up down here so just a thought? that way its putting even more emphasis on OC/DCing.
 
LordEvil
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by zmj44
How about all draft players have college names??

And anybody interested in making this a 40 man roster limit?
Just so you dont have to keep up with too many players


You mean like Florida, Texas or do you mean actual names? I don't follow College ball players much myself.

Don't think 40 would be enough with it being no/no
Thats 20 offense, 19 defense and 1 kicker
kind of limits what you can run
Maybe have a no punting rule?
 
awsalick
offline
Link
 
Since we're all proposing crazy rules, here's mine: No crazy rules.
A no/no pee-wee league is a big enough change for me to be interested. Everything beyond that just complicates things unnecessarily. I'm fine with a draft for non-owner players (just because it might make recruiting easier), but beyond that, I don't care how many agents/GMs/DCs/ST players/mascots/cheerleaders a team has.

Not even a fan of the whole 8 division/2-games vs division setup, just because it is pretty restrictive in regards to the league structure. If a team leaves (or we don't get exactly 32), you can't just have 1 division with 3 teams or 7 divisions.
 
LordEvil
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by awsalick
Since we're all proposing crazy rules, here's mine: No crazy rules.
A no/no pee-wee league is a big enough change for me to be interested. Everything beyond that just complicates things unnecessarily. I'm fine with a draft for non-owner players (just because it might make recruiting easier), but beyond that, I don't care how many agents/GMs/DCs/ST players/mascots/cheerleaders a team has.

Not even a fan of the whole 8 division/2-games vs division setup, just because it is pretty restrictive in regards to the league structure. If a team leaves (or we don't get exactly 32), you can't just have 1 division with 3 teams or 7 divisions.


I agree plus waiting on 13 teams to get filled as well. Was thinking playing division sucks too especially if 4 top teams play in one division.

For now though lets get 32 teams and if not, I'll adjust the league to fit what we have.
Draft will still be optional
 
Link
 
Im in for sure, Chicago Bears for me! This is the one of the coolest ideas in a long time
 
Link
 
oops Chicago Bearz, my bad lol
 
Crik
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by zmj44
And anybody interested in making this a 40 man roster limit?


I would vote for 49 players if you want a limit.

 
inurbase
offline
Link
 
I'm against setting any limit beyond the GLB imposed 55 man limit honestly
 
Stixx
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by inurbase
I'm against setting any limit beyond the GLB imposed 55 man limit honestly


This
 
Jack Daniels
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by inurbase
I'm against setting any limit beyond the GLB imposed 55 man limit honestly


Same here.
 
Jay Gold
offline
Link
 
The only rule I've liked so far is no GM'ing for more than 1 team.
That makes a lot of sense. That way there aren't any dynasties and teams throwing games on purpose.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.