Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Victory Jones


TE envy?


that is my line!! get your own material!!

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
Originally posted by MadCow DTD

of course, he is on a team now that will use him

fixed, tbh had a shit build without 72 upgrades

Winslow is currently sitting on 16 SP, 15 VP's, and 24 BT's. Looks like he can only upgrade 3 of the 4 L72 upgrades due to lack of BT's.

So all he's done is add +2 speed since last season. Not what I call breakout changes.

Originally posted by Dolphin Greats
Winslow is currently sitting on 16 SP, 15 VP's, and 24 BT's. Looks like he can only upgrade 3 of the 4 L72 upgrades due to lack of BT's.

So all he's done is add +2 speed since last season. Not what I call breakout changes.

Idk what you want me to say? My lvl 53 TE will be better at lvl 64 than yours at lvl 72.

He isn't well built he just has homerun potential on deep routes, congrats?

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
Idk what you want me to say? My lvl 53 TE will be better at lvl 64 than yours at lvl 72.

He isn't well built he just has homerun potential on deep routes, congrats?

wait...This the TE that Dpride said was going to be the very best in all of GLB a couple ssns ago. Are you really saying that Dp ruined his build?!?!?

Originally posted by PP
wait...This the TE that Dpride said was going to be the very best in all of GLB a couple ssns ago. Are you really saying that Dp ruined his build?!?!?

Actually lol w/o Dprides help I doubt he'd be on a WL team right now. But you should go back up to my post explaining why we wanted him, it was never because he "very best in all of GLB" and lol if you ever bought that as the reasoning.

Only good for homerun potential?

Well that's exactly what Winslow is built to do!! He was never meant to be short yardage, goalline, super catching in traffic TE.

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
Actually lol w/o Dprides help I doubt he'd be on a WL team right now. But you should go back up to my post explaining why we wanted him, it was never because he "very best in all of GLB" and lol if you ever bought that as the reasoning.

I just remember Dp saying that he was going to be the very best TE in all of GLB before he got him to commit to Blaze. Then, after he got him he said the same. It wasn't that I was "buying" any reason why Dp signed him.

I was just working it through:
1 (He's going to be the very best TE in GLB before he signed to Blaze) + 1 (He was going to be the very best TE in all of GLB after he 1st signed with the Blaze) + 1 (he now "isn't well built he just has homerun potential on deep routes") = ?????????

All BS aside, I'm just surprised you'd say that. To those that remember Dp's posts on it (OK, they were posted as Stern, but you know what I mean), it isn't overly flattering. Not trying to start shit this time, just surprised.

Dpride told me to change 1 piece of AEQ... and move around my VA's.

well I've reset most of those VA's and considering selling that piece of AEQ.

you guys have the greatest self-proclaimed TE in WL with Dane... so if he has mediocre numbers this season, does that mean his build sucks???

Originally posted by Dolphin Greats
mediocre numbers this season, does that mean his build sucks???

a build is bad because it is bad, numbers have more to do with frequency of targets

I supposed for an average agent building a TE, Winslow isn't "bad". But he certainly isn't anything special.

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
a build is bad because it is bad, numbers have more to do with frequency of targets

I supposed for an average agent building a TE, Winslow isn't "bad". But he certainly isn't anything special.

no u

Originally posted by Homage
no u

Zooey is Katy Perry without Tits

Originally posted by Phil Jackson
Originally posted by Homage

no u

Zooey is Katy Perry without Tits

aaaaand neither of them can rival Zane Bauer

Originally posted by zero
Originally posted by Phil Jackson

Originally posted by Homage


no u

Zooey is Katy Perry without Tits

aaaaand neither of them can rival Zane Bauer

who the hell is that?