User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Pee Wee Leagues > Aren't we all sick of overpaying for the same experience as everyone else?
Page:
 
Gerr
offline
Link
 
Count my Bears team in.
 
Gary.
offline
Link
 
lol one team will boost right before the playoffs. Then everyone else will be very mad.

Also teams that move up will just start boosting, just not something that is possible.
Edited by Gary. on May 11, 2010 12:22:45
 
Heffmeister
offline
Link
 
Belfast Bubonic Babies are in.
 
whoshotjr
offline
Link
 
Count the Sherman Oaks Sheriffs in
 
SpadedAce
offline
Link
 
1. Bort will lose money... so good luck with that

2. Why make Pee wee more boring for the average agent then it already is?

3. Theres no way in hell everyone will agree. Or there will be that dumbass that boosts and shit and then when he gets bitched at he's gonna be like "huuuh?"
Edited by SpadedAce on May 11, 2010 13:18:16
 
EatDaBeaver
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by SpadedAce
1. Bort will lose money... so good luck with that

2. Why make Pee wee more boring for the average agent then it already is?


So you really are entertained by pressing the "Waste my money" button once a season?

I'm not asking Bort to do anything, and I don't care if he loses money... its his problem to deal with then... not mine.
 
SpadedAce
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by EatDaBeaver
So you really are entertained by pressing the "Waste my money" button once a season?

I'm not asking Bort to do anything, and I don't care if he loses money... its his problem to deal with then... not mine.


Hey im sorry some ppl live in such bad poverty that they cant afford 50-100 bucks every month or so... get a fucking job like really
 
PING72
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by SpadedAce

2. Why make Pee wee more boring for the average agent then it already is?


How does it make it more boring for the average agent? The only thing you wouldn't be doing that you already are is spending a few extra SP's and wasting money to do so.

I think it would be even more fun. Currently to own a HB on a competitive you need to spend 2100 flex (300 creation, 900 boostin, 900 CEQ). If you're an average agent, instead of making 1 player, you can now make SEVEN players at glory positions. How is that not more fun??
Edited by PING72 on May 11, 2010 13:21:00
Edited by PING72 on May 11, 2010 13:20:31
 
SpadedAce
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by PING72
How does it make it more boring for the average agent? The only thing you wouldn't be doing that you already are is spending a few extra SP's and wasting money to do so.

I think it would be even more fun. Currently to own a HB on a competitive you need to spend 2100 flex (300 creation, 900 boostin, 800 CEQ). If you're an average agent, instead of making 1 player, you can now make SEVEN players at glory positions. How is that not more fun??


Idk really just the fact that your doing somthing yourself that could make a difference for your team basicly in a nutshell its:
Sit and wait till playoffs to boost or
Sit and wait......
 
LordEvil
offline
Link
 
1. What are we asking for by not boosting or buying custom? I have yet to see some type of demand except its just too expensive. What do we want to pay?

2. If he loses too much money don't you guys worry that he may just do away with pee wees? I am sure we take up plenty of server space with leagues, forums and the scrimmages. If it wasn't for pee wee leagues I would of quit this game ages ago. Ive spent close to 2K on the game so looking at it from a business perspective, I just think when someone loses money they fold up. He has made a ton already so it's not like he is losing much.

3. If he makes it cheaper somehow for peewees, dont you think the higher up leagues will throw a huge bitch fit?

Just a few things to ponder. I love the Idea and wish the game was cheaper. Like I was saying 4 players for AC Surf in one season cost me 25 dollars and they aren't even on my own team. I would like Custom to be free. I dont mind boosting but let us select custom EQ points and a tree for free.
 
middawg
offline
Link
 
I have probably boosted and geared up 100 or more pee wee players the last 9 seasons. With the utter lack of focus on improving the cash cow of GLB that is Pee Wee - I am all in favor of this notion.
Edited by middawg on May 11, 2010 13:48:03
 
mvikings77
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by LordEvil
I would like Custom to be free. I dont mind boosting but let us select custom EQ points and a tree for free.


+100
Thats really what its about for me also!!!
 
zmj44
offline
Link
 
If this happens than the providence Steamrollers silver 1 are in. This would be amazing.
But, I don't think it would happen, unless somebody takes the liberty to PM all of the owners. Maybe we should have reps for each league to PM everybody?
 
MGeezy2186
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by SpadedAce
Originally posted by EatDaBeaver

So you really are entertained by pressing the "Waste my money" button once a season?

I'm not asking Bort to do anything, and I don't care if he loses money... its his problem to deal with then... not mine.


Hey im sorry some ppl live in such bad poverty that they cant afford 50-100 bucks every month or so... get a fucking job like really


i actually have a job, i just literally think about how fucking dumb it is to spend as much money as i have on a game...theres just much better stuff to spend money on IMO..u say u spend 600-1200 a year...thats just stupid man

i probably am in for a couple 100 over the 2 years ive been here, and if i could get even half of that back for my flex i would in a heartbeat
 
Heffmeister
offline
Link
 
About the potential drain on GLB revenues that this suggestion would bring, a possible remedy:

Maybe the player creation system could be changed a little to specify upfront that a PeeWee player is being created, at which time the cost for creation doubles. So OL, K & P cost 200, right up to QBs WRs & HBs costing 600.

Boosting could be de-activated, much like at 441 days old. Players would have a shelf life of 1 season only, with 70% (or an amount to be determined by Bort's business analysts) refunded on retirement.

Unsure how the CE issue could be addressed, but I think the above could fly... given the willingness of GLB admin.


Ultimately the ongoing cost of PeeWee is disproportionate, and (in my view) needs to be examined by management.

 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.