Warrior General Games

Originally posted by pjsebas
Nice, I see 2 people complain in this forum...TKAlex and chargersfan1 and we get the following PM.


From:
frank274323
Date Sent:
Mar 28, 2010 09:36:22
Subject:
No tourney
Sorry, but based on the popular vote, you cannot join the tourney. Many teams think you guys are out of their leauge, and many said you guys were too good. I would love to have you guys in our tourney, but the popular vote always wins. I'm sorry, but you guys can't join this tourney.


When was this vote held and who voted? I am pretty sure the better teams like the Munich Owls and West Lovington would love another shot at us, especially since we are not boosting this upcoming season.

Lame



There was 3 owners, who didn't want you guys in the tourney. At that time there was 0 people who were against them. I'm sorry, I hate conflicts, but I can't do anything. I hope you can understand.


And BTW guys this tourney starts on Tuesday, I will post the matchups and guidelines tommorow.

Originally posted by pjsebas
Nice, I see 2 people complain in this forum...TKAlex and chargersfan1 and we get the following PM.


From:
frank274323
Date Sent:
Mar 28, 2010 09:36:22
Subject:
No tourney
Sorry, but based on the popular vote, you cannot join the tourney. Many teams think you guys are out of their leauge, and many said you guys were too good. I would love to have you guys in our tourney, but the popular vote always wins. I'm sorry, but you guys can't join this tourney.


When was this vote held and who voted? I am pretty sure the better teams like the Munich Owls and West Lovington would love another shot at us, especially since we are not boosting this upcoming season.

Lame



Why don't you organize a SSB tourney and play teams with the same amount of total XP as your team?If Munich and Lovington want a shot at you set up a ranked scrimm.
LAME

Originally posted by NorDoor
Why don't you organize a SSB tourney and play teams with the same amount of total XP as your team?If Munich and Lovington want a shot at you set up a ranked scrimm.
LAME



+1

And not all my players boost I don't force anyone to boost, and who in the world of glb would boost at the start of the of the season.

The Cincinnati White Tigers shouldn't be allowed in the tourney. They only have an effective lvl of 31 and had a record of 14-10 last season. They wouldn't even be a challenge for the better teams in this tourney.

Oh, someone is complaining, better boot them out.

Originally posted by pjsebas
The Cincinnati White Tigers shouldn't be allowed in the tourney. They only have an effective lvl of 31 and had a record of 14-10 last season. They wouldn't even be a challenge for the better teams in this tourney.

Oh, someone is complaining, better boot them out.

Actually, you'll need two other teams to complain, because 3 out of 32 is considered the popular vote.

Kicking the Reapers out because a couple guys complain that is "not fair" is lame as hell. These tourneys are supposed to tell you who the best L30 capped team is. The Reapers know we want another shot at them. In fact if your team is worth a shit the Owls want a shot at you. I want to play the highest competition available, I had no idea this tourney was for teams that that to play against bums. Win, lose, or draw the Owls are here to compete and if you aren't on your game we will put up big points on you.

I gotta say pretty lame that they were removed. Its like the NCAA removing Kentucky because they recruited better than everyone else in college basketball this year.

There are clearly teams that have entered that are better than others. If you did not want to play against the best level 30 teams then you should not have entered IMHO.

Originally posted by rellascout
I gotta say pretty lame that they were removed. Its like the NCAA removing Kentucky because they recruited better than everyone else in college basketball this year.

There are clearly teams that have entered that are better than others. If you did not want to play against the best level 30 teams then you should not have entered IMHO.

This is nothing like holding Kentucky out, unless Kentucky kept their whole starting roster on the practice squad and then after they graduate decide they would all play this year as graduated seniors. I have no problem facing anyone, but when people say they are non-boosters but their players are over twice as old as the rest of the league because they SSSB the team then you can no longer call your self a non-boosting team, you are a SSSB team. I don't know why SSSB teams get mad that people complain about the unfair advantage of training your players for 4 seasons before they actually play in a game, that is exactly why they did it, so they could have an advantage. SSSB teams must like the drama, I am sure this is not the first time that they have been singled out. And they are not the only team doing it. And if they are not winning every game buy at least 100 points then we can see why they would need to have the advantage. Excuse me, I need to go play tackle football against a bunch of Pee Wee kids and tell them to stop bitching because they should want to play the best competition.

Originally posted by sevenbgbn
This is nothing like holding Kentucky out, unless Kentucky kept their whole starting roster on the practice squad and then after they graduate decide they would all play this year as graduated seniors. I have no problem facing anyone, but when people say they are non-boosters but their players are over twice as old as the rest of the league because they SSSB the team then you can no longer call your self a non-boosting team, you are a SSSB team. I don't know why SSSB teams get mad that people complain about the unfair advantage of training your players for 4 seasons before they actually play in a game, that is exactly why they did it, so they could have an advantage. SSSB teams must like the drama, I am sure this is not the first time that they have been singled out. And they are not the only team doing it. And if they are not winning every game buy at least 100 points then we can see why they would need to have the advantage. Excuse me, I need to go play tackle football against a bunch of Pee Wee kids and tell them to stop bitching because they should want to play the best competition.

Ever heard of a red shirt year? Same thing as SSB. What I get sick of is listening to whiny boosters who think that paying to play entitles them to winning. I hope my team draws yours so we non-boosters can kick the shit out of your crappy team in the tournament as well as in the regular season of the Elite Minors level 30 league #2.

Week 5 is going to be a blood bath...... http://goallineblitz.com/game/compare_teams.pl?team1=5799&team2=5931

Now lets here your excuse about real non-boosting teams..... come I know you got one already thought up. The reality is that there are a million different ways to play this game. Some boost some don't. Some cap build some don't. Some teams win championships some don't. Your an arrogant ass to think that your way is the only way. If SSB teams were not allowed to join it should have stated that in the sign up for the tourney. The reality is looking over the 32 teams there are really only about 6 with a shot to win it and hate to break it to you.... you ain't one of those 6.

Originally posted by sevenbgbn
This is nothing like holding Kentucky out, unless Kentucky kept their whole starting roster on the practice squad and then after they graduate decide they would all play this year as graduated seniors. I have no problem facing anyone, but when people say they are non-boosters but their players are over twice as old as the rest of the league because they SSSB the team then you can no longer call your self a non-boosting team, you are a SSSB team. I don't know why SSSB teams get mad that people complain about the unfair advantage of training your players for 4 seasons before they actually play in a game, that is exactly why they did it, so they could have an advantage. SSSB teams must like the drama, I am sure this is not the first time that they have been singled out. And they are not the only team doing it. And if they are not winning every game buy at least 100 points then we can see why they would need to have the advantage. Excuse me, I need to go play tackle football against a bunch of Pee Wee kids and tell them to stop bitching because they should want to play the best competition.

We SSB teams do love drama. I've been on both sides of that debate, and it is what it is. The reason the Reapers won every game by 100+ last year is because Support would not move them to an Elite league, so they were stuck beating on scrubs and bums all season long in a regular league. If you guys want to turn this tourney into the NIT tourney like they have in college basketball, so be it. But I thought this was for the cream of the crop, thats why I signed us up. If this is the tourney where everyone gets an honorable mention and cookies and juice at the end, I don't see why we are here. We came to compete with the top teams, and beat the hell out of the bums.

Originally posted by rellascout
Ever heard of a red shirt year? Same thing as SSB. What I get sick of is listening to whiny boosters who think that paying to play entitles them to winning. I hope my team draws yours so we non-boosters can kick the shit out of your crappy team in the tournament as well as in the regular season of the Elite Minors level 30 league #2.

Week 5 is going to be a blood bath...... http://goallineblitz.com/game/compare_teams.pl?team1=5799&team2=5931

Now lets here your excuse about real non-boosting teams..... come I know you got one already thought up. The reality is that there are a million different ways to play this game. Some boost some don't. Some cap build some don't. Some teams win championships some don't. Your an arrogant ass to think that your way is the only way. If SSB teams were not allowed to join it should have stated that in the sign up for the tourney. The reality is looking over the 32 teams there are really only about 6 with a shot to win it and hate to break it to you.... you ain't one of those 6.

I must have struck a nerve.

You guys better boot the Thai Fighters next. They are rated higher than the Reapers. Or is this just about hating on the Reapers?



http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=5931

Originally posted by Derek McFadden
We SSB teams do love drama. I've been on both sides of that debate, and it is what it is. The reason the Reapers won every game by 100+ last year is because Support would not move them to an Elite league, so they were stuck beating on scrubs and bums all season long in a regular league. If you guys want to turn this tourney into the NIT tourney like they have in college basketball, so be it. But I thought this was for the cream of the crop, thats why I signed us up. If this is the tourney where everyone gets an honorable mention and cookies and juice at the end, I don't see why we are here. We came to compete with the top teams, and beat the hell out of the bums.

Let the Reapers in here, I never said not to, I just stated my opinion on the matter and was abused by doing so. Since when is giving your opinion wrong, apparently when it disagrees with your philosophy. Don't take someone disagreeing with you as a sign of your obvious lack of manhood. If SSSB teams were totally legal then they wouldn't have made rules to negate that advantage. Anyone is free to build their team the way they want. You skirted the rules and that is your business.

If you are letting in the Thai Fighters, who happen to have an Effective Lv rating of 39 (3 entire levels higher than the Reapers), than what is your justification for kicking out the Reapers?