Warrior General Games

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by Drago

Originally posted by Cactus71



no I'm right

Originally posted by TSE




I'd rather lose with honor than with dishonesty and lies and hateful attacks.

Jesus fucking christ, this weak ass shtick again? Tell us how many "principles" and how "honest" and how much "integrity" you have when you're the result for games like this:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=288703

Way to get E.D. Jackson 2 carries.

Now, go fuck your face.




LOL, what does a 100 pt blowout have to do w/anything? I don't understand what point you are trying to make? LOL


Yup, you must be clueless. We all know this. That's why you'll never be relevant again.

Originally posted by Drago
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert

Originally posted by Drago


Originally posted by Cactus71




no I'm right

Originally posted by TSE





I'd rather lose with honor than with dishonesty and lies and hateful attacks.

Jesus fucking christ, this weak ass shtick again? Tell us how many "principles" and how "honest" and how much "integrity" you have when you're the result for games like this:

http://goallineblitz.com/game/game.pl?game_id=288703

Way to get E.D. Jackson 2 carries.

Now, go fuck your face.




LOL, what does a 100 pt blowout have to do w/anything? I don't understand what point you are trying to make? LOL


Yup, you must be clueless. We all know this. That's why you'll never be relevant again.

Just to fill you in Drago was showing you how shitty your honor is by running up the score in order to get your QB better numbers and not give any love at all to your HB's. Your honor = fail

It was a gutted game, we've had lots of gutted games where we only ran the ball or only passed the ball. I treated gutted games like an experiment to play with for entertainment value. It doesnt' make any difference, no matter what you do against a gutted team you are going to get monster stats, whether that's all to the RBs or all to the WRs or half and half, what difference does it make? If you take a look at most gutted games in the past the RBs typically used to get most of the action and stats against them, that particular game was to shift more love to the WRs.

I can't believe that you really feel the need to expound so in-depth on attacking my game plans against gutted teams, that's absolutely pathetic that it would warrant so much attention. And these gutted teams are another reason why I don't have fun playing the game anymore, because it makes the game ridiculous. When the heck can we have a competitive league with not gutted teams and 100 pt blowouts, that's not football, that's an abortion!

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
It was a gutted game, we've had lots of gutted games where we only ran the ball or only passed the ball. I treated gutted games like an experiment to play with for entertainment value. It doesnt' make any difference, no matter what you do against a gutted team you are going to get monster stats, whether that's all to the RBs or all to the WRs or half and half, what difference does it make? If you take a look at most gutted games in the past the RBs typically used to get most of the action and stats against them, that particular game was to shift more love to the WRs.

I can't believe that you really feel the need to expound so in-depth on attacking my game plans against gutted teams, that's absolutely pathetic that it would warrant so much attention. And these gutted teams are another reason why I don't have fun playing the game anymore, because it makes the game ridiculous. When the heck can we have a competitive league with not gutted teams and 100 pt blowouts, that's not football, that's an abortion!

Hmmm you're a pot and it's a kettle. Did you just call it black? Your team lost many games this season by high number of points giving no competition. You are abortion? BTW I didn't look up that game I just clicked on Drago's link and was stating what I felt he was pointing out. Honestly we all have blowout games. I love to bust your balls.

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert



I'd rather lose .

I agree, you are honest.

Originally posted by kadafitcd
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert

It was a gutted game, we've had lots of gutted games where we only ran the ball or only passed the ball. I treated gutted games like an experiment to play with for entertainment value. It doesnt' make any difference, no matter what you do against a gutted team you are going to get monster stats, whether that's all to the RBs or all to the WRs or half and half, what difference does it make? If you take a look at most gutted games in the past the RBs typically used to get most of the action and stats against them, that particular game was to shift more love to the WRs.

I can't believe that you really feel the need to expound so in-depth on attacking my game plans against gutted teams, that's absolutely pathetic that it would warrant so much attention. And these gutted teams are another reason why I don't have fun playing the game anymore, because it makes the game ridiculous. When the heck can we have a competitive league with not gutted teams and 100 pt blowouts, that's not football, that's an abortion!

Hmmm you're a pot and it's a kettle. Did you just call it black? Your team lost many games this season by high number of points giving no competition. You are abortion? BTW I didn't look up that game I just clicked on Drago's link and was stating what I felt he was pointing out. Honestly we all have blowout games. I love to bust your balls.

Well we weren't talking about this year, Drago's harping on me about a game in the past with 2 carries, and you were endorsing his argument, I was just looking for your rationale. This post of yours here is going off on a different tangent now, so I don't know how else to respond as you seem to be jumping around to a different issue.

You brought the issue up with the gutted teams. Your team this year was almost a gut job. That is all I was saying. I am ashamed that I backed Drago...

Originally posted by kadafitcd
You brought the issue up with the gutted teams. Your team this year was almost a gut job. That is all I was saying. I am ashamed that I backed Drago...

...I'm not sure what to do here, so fuck your face... I think...

Originally posted by kadafitcd
You brought the issue up with the gutted teams. Your team this year was almost a gut job. That is all I was saying. I am ashamed that I backed Drago...

Oh ok. Yeah we were borderline gut jobs for other teams. That's unfortunately not good for the league indeed. That's why the game should be designed to filter out this mess. I haven't seen one season yet where gut job teams weren't prevalent somewhere to mess up the statistical order of things. Having some teams wanting to play with 55 and others that choose to play 40 is just inherently dumb.

That's one of my arguments for why I think a 35 man roster would be much more fun, cause then 100% of the teams would play ball with that setup and every team would be on an even page with that regard. Or without a lower roster of 35-40, then it would be better if Bort just kicked us out of the league and put a 55 man roster team in our place. It's not fun for us getting wasted by 55 man teams, and it's not fun for everybody else in USAPro to have us as a near gut job team that throws off the statistics. Everybody loses, which is why I think GLB needs serious changes, which is why I don't find the game fun.

Originally posted by Drago
Originally posted by kadafitcd

You brought the issue up with the gutted teams. Your team this year was almost a gut job. That is all I was saying. I am ashamed that I backed Drago...

...I'm not sure what to do here, so fuck your face... I think...

LOL, now this is actually a quality funny post.

Just think of it this way - Bort = the Borg You must conform!

Well I still don't have 55 men, so the Borg aren't doing a good job of forcing my compliance! Apparently I can resist as much as I'd like....lol Borg sissies!

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by kadafitcd

You brought the issue up with the gutted teams. Your team this year was almost a gut job. That is all I was saying. I am ashamed that I backed Drago...

Oh ok. Yeah we were borderline gut jobs for other teams. That's unfortunately not good for the league indeed. That's why the game should be designed to filter out this mess. I haven't seen one season yet where gut job teams weren't prevalent somewhere to mess up the statistical order of things. Having some teams wanting to play with 55 and others that choose to play 40 is just inherently dumb.

That's one of my arguments for why I think a 35 man roster would be much more fun, cause then 100% of the teams would play ball with that setup and every team would be on an even page with that regard. Or without a lower roster of 35-40, then it would be better if Bort just kicked us out of the league and put a 55 man roster team in our place. It's not fun for us getting wasted by 55 man teams, and it's not fun for everybody else in USAPro to have us as a near gut job team that throws off the statistics. Everybody loses, which is why I think GLB needs serious changes, which is why I don't find the game fun.

Because you can't find 55 agents to play for you.

It's amazing that when you try to play a game that is not being offered, you end up losing.

Originally posted by tomcollins
It's amazing that when you try to play a game that is not being offered, you end up losing.

This,

You may not have conformed but you are paying the price for not doing so.