Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Mad Cow
Originally posted by HurricaneBear

Originally posted by Mad Cow


Originally posted by HurricaneBear



Originally posted by Voltron




http://goallineblitz.com/game/team.pl?team_id=442

that's what im talking about. I could personally care less about his little avatar bet bs but it was a challenge at first and I fully expect Rawr Rawr to own him. Madcow's OT should start if you want it to be fair. We'll see if the shit talkers are man enough to match now. It's not like Snaza's starters is that great, we raped him worse than Madcows OT

lol, after the 3rd edit, you finally got it right

so your OT is starting right? Or you bitching out?

lol, it dont matter if i start or im a backup, ill be splitting time, thats how we roll, but if he wants me to start him, ill do it, i dot care, its a fucking dot

I dot care too and I want to see it.

Uh yeah.......

No Stiff Rodd will not be starting for situational purposes.
But here's the # of plays the last 3 games
Andre Fezzik ... 49 , 49 , 53
Stiff Rodd ........ 39 , 38 , 40

So I REALLY don't think it's gonna be a problem. He'll have plenty of chances to beat Stiff Rodd.

IF he man's up and does the bet.

Originally posted by Snaza
Uh yeah.......

No Stiff Rodd will not be starting for situational purposes.
But here's the # of plays the last 3 games
Andre Fezzik ... 49 , 49 , 53
Stiff Rodd ........ 39 , 38 , 40

So I REALLY don't think it's gonna be a problem. He'll have plenty of chances to beat Stiff Rodd.

IF he man's up and does the bet.

I'm waiting for him to offer up the bet. He's the one who wanted to bet me so badly.

Originally posted by Voltron
Originally posted by Snaza

Uh yeah.......

No Stiff Rodd will not be starting for situational purposes.
But here's the # of plays the last 3 games
Andre Fezzik ... 49 , 49 , 53
Stiff Rodd ........ 39 , 38 , 40

So I REALLY don't think it's gonna be a problem. He'll have plenty of chances to beat Stiff Rodd.

IF he man's up and does the bet.

I'm waiting for him to offer up the bet. He's the one who wanted to bet me so badly.

It SHOULD be....

0 Sacks 1 v 1 = You change your avy for 2 weeks
And Mad Cow will change his avy ... 1 week for every sack vs Stiff Rodd 1 v 1

I know he'll agree to that.

Originally posted by Snaza
Originally posted by Voltron

Originally posted by Snaza


Uh yeah.......

No Stiff Rodd will not be starting for situational purposes.
But here's the # of plays the last 3 games
Andre Fezzik ... 49 , 49 , 53
Stiff Rodd ........ 39 , 38 , 40

So I REALLY don't think it's gonna be a problem. He'll have plenty of chances to beat Stiff Rodd.

IF he man's up and does the bet.

I'm waiting for him to offer up the bet. He's the one who wanted to bet me so badly.

It SHOULD be....

0 Sacks 1 v 1 = You change your avy for 2 weeks
And Mad Cow will change his avy ... 1 week for every sack vs Stiff Rodd 1 v 1

I know he'll agree to that.

Minimum 15 plays in 1v1 in passing situations?

certainly this game cant live up to the hype now.

Originally posted by Rusty Trombone
certainly this game cant live up to the hype now.

Lol, I don't know why there's so much hype over a game that has absolutely no importance on anything.

Originally posted by Voltron
Originally posted by Rusty Trombone

certainly this game cant live up to the hype now.

Lol, I don't know why there's so much hype over a game that has absolutely no importance on anything.

because your team decided it was a good idea to feed the troll version of madcow

Originally posted by g-bay-be
Originally posted by Voltron

Originally posted by Rusty Trombone


certainly this game cant live up to the hype now.

Lol, I don't know why there's so much hype over a game that has absolutely no importance on anything.

because your team decided it was a good idea to feed the troll version of madcow

Hey, you have to have some fun sometimes! It'd be boring If I couldn't come on here and trash talk.

Originally posted by Snaza
Uh yeah.......

No Stiff Rodd will not be starting for situational purposes.
But here's the # of plays the last 3 games
Andre Fezzik ... 49 , 49 , 53
Stiff Rodd ........ 39 , 38 , 40

So I REALLY don't think it's gonna be a problem. He'll have plenty of chances to beat Stiff Rodd.

IF he man's up and does the bet.

lame

Originally posted by Snaza
Uh yeah.......

No Stiff Rodd will not be starting for situational purposes.
But here's the # of plays the last 3 games
Andre Fezzik ... 49 , 49 , 53
Stiff Rodd ........ 39 , 38 , 40

So I REALLY don't think it's gonna be a problem. He'll have plenty of chances to beat Stiff Rodd.

IF he man's up and does the bet.


were the ones manning up and changing up our defense, switching positions and all. you should man up and start cows OT. voltron will do the bet anyway but thats just hypocrtical of you

im up for whatever, when ever, im a God

Originally posted by tycoon34
Originally posted by Snaza

Uh yeah.......

No Stiff Rodd will not be starting for situational purposes.
But here's the # of plays the last 3 games
Andre Fezzik ... 49 , 49 , 53
Stiff Rodd ........ 39 , 38 , 40

So I REALLY don't think it's gonna be a problem. He'll have plenty of chances to beat Stiff Rodd.

IF he man's up and does the bet.


were the ones manning up and changing up our defense, switching positions and all. you should man up and start cows OT. voltron will do the bet anyway but thats just hypocrtical of you

Really?

Really....

You think that's hypocritical for a 9th place team to say to the 2nd place team.... "If you want the bet, move your DE (who's just as good as the DE he'll be swapping with) over to our side so they can match up." ?

Really....

Originally posted by Snaza
Originally posted by tycoon34

Originally posted by Snaza


Uh yeah.......

No Stiff Rodd will not be starting for situational purposes.
But here's the # of plays the last 3 games
Andre Fezzik ... 49 , 49 , 53
Stiff Rodd ........ 39 , 38 , 40

So I REALLY don't think it's gonna be a problem. He'll have plenty of chances to beat Stiff Rodd.

IF he man's up and does the bet.


were the ones manning up and changing up our defense, switching positions and all. you should man up and start cows OT. voltron will do the bet anyway but thats just hypocrtical of you

Really?

Really....

You think that's hypocritical for a 9th place team to say to the 2nd place team.... "If you want the bet, move your DE (who's just as good as the DE he'll be swapping with) over to our side so they can match up." ?

Really....

really. Yall keep claiming that you'll beat us, and that Rawr Rawr is second rate (whether just fooling around or not)...if MC thinks his OT is good enough to hold RR to 0 sacks, and we move him to a position he doesn't play at, I think you can start that OT over him. Like you said, it's so close anyway. But I think it's only fair that RR and MC's OT start off against eachother and go from there.

And if you dont think strategy is involved when placing DEs...then that's pretty LOL to me.

Originally posted by tycoon34
Originally posted by Snaza

Originally posted by tycoon34


Originally posted by Snaza



Uh yeah.......

No Stiff Rodd will not be starting for situational purposes.
But here's the # of plays the last 3 games
Andre Fezzik ... 49 , 49 , 53
Stiff Rodd ........ 39 , 38 , 40

So I REALLY don't think it's gonna be a problem. He'll have plenty of chances to beat Stiff Rodd.

IF he man's up and does the bet.


were the ones manning up and changing up our defense, switching positions and all. you should man up and start cows OT. voltron will do the bet anyway but thats just hypocrtical of you

Really?

Really....

You think that's hypocritical for a 9th place team to say to the 2nd place team.... "If you want the bet, move your DE (who's just as good as the DE he'll be swapping with) over to our side so they can match up." ?

Really....

really. Yall keep claiming that you'll beat us, and that Rawr Rawr is second rate (whether just fooling around or not)...if MC thinks his OT is good enough to hold RR to 0 sacks, and we move him to a position he doesn't play at, I think you can start that OT over him. Like you said, it's so close anyway. But I think it's only fair that RR and MC's OT start off against eachother and go from there.

And if you dont think strategy is involved when placing DEs...then that's pretty LOL to me.

lol is that really what you think, is that really what you think i think....