Originally posted by Sik Wit It
Well you're comparing you to us...and we don't play gutted teams.
If you do the math without that game factored in, you give up a little over 102 yds/game instead of 95. Making our rush D better
.
Doesn't it also factor in sacks as negative runs, which we admittedly have very few of?
Can we at least agree that both of our run defenses qualify as 'good'?
Well you're comparing you to us...and we don't play gutted teams.
If you do the math without that game factored in, you give up a little over 102 yds/game instead of 95. Making our rush D better
.Doesn't it also factor in sacks as negative runs, which we admittedly have very few of?
Can we at least agree that both of our run defenses qualify as 'good'?





























