Warrior General Games

you definitely have a hands up this year on Rudy Ruettiger..stupid fixed bug

Originally posted by liltman53
12 Tackles with 4 INT's today, put myself back in the INT lead for the second consecutive season after starting the year with hardly any INT's.

goddamn, dude

Originally posted by knightdemon
you definitely have a hands up this year on Rudy Ruettiger..stupid fixed bug

Sorrry *shrugs* =P

Last year it was very close. Asante Samuel would be up there too, but he doesn't get nearly as many INT's.

i know my 4 INT's aren't that impressive, but i like to rely on my dominant amount of PD's .

Originally posted by liltman53
12 Tackles with 4 INT's today, put myself back in the INT lead for the second consecutive season after starting the year with hardly any INT's.

catching up on tackles to.

in the talks for defensive player of the year again?

Nothing against your player, but I've noticed that for the most part, players who get a lot of tackles and such are players on bad teams. The more a defense is out on the field, the more opportunities the defenders have to get stats.

i know you said most part, but just for the fun of it, il point out that im on the spartans, and were easily a top team .

Also, there really isn't such a huge difference

il take the top 5 worst teams for example

Here's the ratio of offensive plays : defensive plays

Stingers: 98:95
Gamblers: 87:98
Thunder: 84:98
Cougars: 89:98
Bulldogs: 92:100

Players who get a lot of tackles, can solely be based on how many plays they themselves get (if their stamina can handle it) and if they get around well

im not saying your wrong though

Originally posted by FairForever

That's a joke, right?

The East teams are the cream of the crop. Yes, there are more walkovers in the East, but you have to face the Mustangs/Pushovers/Coyotes. Not fun at all. DDT and the Spartans are good, but not at that level.

A team in the West would need a huge talent infusion or a lot of luck to win the championship this season.

I think the Spartans and the DDTs are at the same level as the Pushovers/Coyotes/Mustangs. Mustangs are the team to beat, not a question in my mind, but the Pushovers/Coyotes haven't proved anything that shows their superior to the DDTs or Spartans.

How can you even prove that the Pushovers/Coyotes are better? Only way to prove that is by playing each other. Only way that happens is in the finals.

It's a matter of opinion. Just comes off that the East is biased to the East. I'm able to admit that the East has more heavy weights (top 4) than the West (top 2), but I'd say the DDTs and Spartans are comparable to the Pushovers and Coyotes.

Like i said before, there's only one way to find out

Finals

Originally posted by suhgamer
Originally posted by FairForever


That's a joke, right?

The East teams are the cream of the crop. Yes, there are more walkovers in the East, but you have to face the Mustangs/Pushovers/Coyotes. Not fun at all. DDT and the Spartans are good, but not at that level.

A team in the West would need a huge talent infusion or a lot of luck to win the championship this season.

I think the Spartans and the DDTs are at the same level as the Pushovers/Coyotes/Mustangs. Mustangs are the team to beat, not a question in my mind, but the Pushovers/Coyotes haven't proved anything that shows their superior to the DDTs or Spartans.

How can you even prove that the Pushovers/Coyotes are better? Only way to prove that is by playing each other. Only way that happens is in the finals.

It's a matter of opinion. Just comes off that the East is biased to the East. I'm able to admit that the East has more heavy weights (top 4) than the West (top 2), but I'd say the DDTs and Spartans are comparable to the Pushovers and Coyotes.

Weell I have 3 players in the West and a team in the West and 1 player in the East and I do think the East is still better.

My QB has 2,358 pass yds and 14TDs 69.5% completion and 85.6 QB rating, we have only played top 10 teams in the USA Pro Western Conference, with an exception of 1 which was our opening game.

I beat Paul Crewe, Jade Falcon, and Adam Zapel in every stat when my team played their respective teams.

Wait What was probably my QBs ONLY biggest threat going head-to-head this season, in terms of production when we played each other, only because i had more INTs than he did.

My QB didnt even boost yet either.

I dunno if he'll win an MVP but i think he should at least be on the consideration list.

man if I remember that game correctly..I completed 75% passing and had 1 TD with a 91 QB rating against a fully boosted defense at the time and you had 64% passing and an 84 QB rating and a pick with 95% of us unboosted...I must be dreaming or something

Originally posted by knightdemon
man if I remember that game correctly..I completed 75% passing and had 1 TD with a 91 QB rating against a fully boosted defense at the time and you had 64% passing and an 84 QB rating and a pick with 95% of us unboosted...I must be dreaming or something

And we had 90% of us unboosted as well.

your right, knight. I never said your QB wasnt good though, i know he is good.

But i had 100 more pass yds than you, you had only 148, my Y/A was 7.1 and yours was 4.2. You had no TDs, i had 1. I had 1 INT, but you had 1 Sack.

You just completed 3 more passes than i did, we both had same attempts, but yet i still had more yards than you.

I really dont care much about QB rating when my performance was clearly more efficient on that game.

Our defense wasnt boosted in that game either, I have a DT and he wasnt boosted, actually at LEAST half of our team isnt boosted yet either. lol

Whitey Ford for Rookie of the Year lol

check that game log again prime..no TD's?