Warrior General Games

Originally posted by Mamba81
Is this even about the original agrument anymore? lol, seems like a cyber war now that isn't about the original topic.

the original topic has grown up and gone off to college while we wait for you and al capone to fix the problem you created. this is now presently more about other people trying to justify your lapse in good judgement.

Originally posted by Mamba81
Is this even about the original agrument anymore? lol, seems like a cyber war now that isn't about the original topic.

I dare ask the question, does the orginal argument even matter? Who cares of somebody is wrong or right, doesn't change anything. Not like the loser of the argument has to give up the game and retire.

Well aren't you a bundle of joy? I'm already narrowing down offers from pro teams so don't worry about me.

Originally posted by mgse
Originally posted by Lef Grebo

Gee math sure has changed since I went to school. Let's apply this to scientific theory. You can disprove one hypothesis and that disproves all hypothosis' in an entire therom? I'd hate to see where we would be if that were true. And take the class, you might actually learn how the algorithms you use in your everyday life were worked out. Unless they no longer use Logic in Math, its been 20 years since I was in college....

A hypothesis is a suggested explanation/reasonable proposal. In no way shape or form is it any sort of proof. The person making the hypothesis should work towards proving his/her hypothesis.

If said person only creates the hypothesis, but does no work to further the cause, what credibility does that person have? In my estimation, little to none. What good is a explanation/proposal/guess if there is no evidence to back it up?

Furthermore, when all the hypotheses are connected and 1 is cast in doubt, the originator should go back and reevaluate the entire set. He/she may provide further proof that the direction is valid. If he cannot or will not provide that detail, that branch of reasoning will most likely be discarded until someone else champions the cause.

Anyway, I'm off to bed. Feel free to continue arguing.

in a debate the burden of proof is on the affirmative. in this case you are affirmed that the situation is legitimate, ie no cheating. therefore the burden is on you to prove it so. which obviously you cannot which is why mr. grebo so handily has gone good will hunting on yer ass. how do you like them apples? sleep tight.

Seeing as how the last day to trade/cut is today, it should be interesting to see if anything actually gets done or this is mysteriously forgotten about

Originally posted by mgse
Originally posted by Lef Grebo

Gee math sure has changed since I went to school. Let's apply this to scientific theory. You can disprove one hypothesis and that disproves all hypothosis' in an entire therom? I'd hate to see where we would be if that were true. And take the class, you might actually learn how the algorithms you use in your everyday life were worked out. Unless they no longer use Logic in Math, its been 20 years since I was in college....

A hypothesis is a suggested explanation/reasonable proposal. In no way shape or form is it any sort of proof. The person making the hypothesis should work towards proving his/her hypothesis.

If said person only creates the hypothesis, but does no work to further the cause, what credibility does that person have? In my estimation, little to none. What good is a explanation/proposal/guess if there is no evidence to back it up?

Furthermore, when all the hypotheses are connected and 1 is cast in doubt, the originator should go back and reevaluate the entire set. He/she may provide further proof that the direction is valid. If he cannot or will not provide that detail, that branch of reasoning will most likely be discarded until someone else champions the cause.

Anyway, I'm off to bed. Feel free to continue arguing.


Bad analogy on my part. Anyway, I'm done. I let myself get drawn into a petty pissy fight with you. Congrats. Please do look into the logic class. People are not equations. So they have different rules of engagment. When the rules are observedpeople can discuss thier different opinions with some measure of intelligence. When they are not, well you get petty pissy fights.

As to the original issue, there does not seem to be much left to discuss. Mamba looks to be moving on, assuming AlCapwn releases him. Good for Mamba for taking the high road, even though it was the most difficult.

I look forward to seeing how this all plays out.

Originally posted by

We were overmatched because Mamba didn't have the time to be an effective coach/manager.

lol.. here in-lies the crux. How can you not understand the problem with this? If Mamba doesn't have time to to keep the team effective, he should give it over to someone that does. What he should not do is take his guy and a bunch of his team over to an under-matched league. If you all really just wanted to stay together, then you all could of shared ownership in the team. I would guess that combined, you all would have enough time to coach/manage.
Originally posted by

If you think it's a joke then fine. I personally didn't know that there was such a big gap in talent between the leagues. For your player, I have no problems... he should not have been in a AAA league to begin with. But Mamba's guy if another story as are most of the others. The avg WR in this league is a level 8-9 and he is a 17. He is on par w/ many of the WRs in the Pro leagues.
Originally posted by

Basically I don't spend enough time on this game to care that much. And I think I am finished arguing. If you all want to bitch and moan more, go ahead. Draw your own conclusions. In fact the incessant holier-than-thou namecalling attitude actually makes me want to stay on the Quarantine.

Actually, I hope you do stay.. your player actually makes their team worse.

save the drama for your mama!!!!

It is really funny when cheaters try to defend themselves. Thanks for all of the laughs.

Originally posted by Yard Dog

If your whole group still wanted to stick together then you should have all stayed with the original team. And if you truely are too busy now and didn't have or want to continue to own the team you should have:
A - picked some of your buddies or someone else on the team to be GM's and run the team.
B - Sold the team to a new owner and all of you stayed with that team in that context.

If you just wanted to be together then why move?
If your getting your butt creamed up there, then remember the last place team will be moved down a level. And all teams have growing pains and cannot expect to win right away. Just keep working hard and if all your buddies and you are active, then your team would have eventually turned around anyway.
thank you

Originally posted by General Terms
Originally posted by Alcapown

I am not the criminal mastermind that oh so many of you have branded me, I saw them in the market, signed them, thats all on my part. And they are a great group of guys and you guys should not tarnish their rep like you are, nor mine. I have not broken the rules in anyway, and if you go back, this conversation was started by someone calling me a cheater.. I am behind Mamba and all the guys 100% , and they will be my guys until an admin tells me I have done wrong, which based on the rules, I have not, and I really havent.


Saw who on the market? The only player who anyone can tell was actually offered on the free market was mamba's. what about the other 9? and how do you explain the players getting to the market in the first place? can you justify 10 players being cut from the Mambas before that team is sold? dont you care about the owner who inherited the team after you took all of its best players? like i said before even if we could believe your 'bag of these awesome players fell from the sky and hit me in the head' innocence routine any reasonable persons 'this aint right alarm' would be blaring with even the thought of bringing them all to your team. or perhaps you think its just the other 15 people posting here all pissed of that are the unreasonable ones? you say you wont do the right thing, even after mamba has decided to at least try and make it right, unless the admins make you. well heres to hoping they do and double heres to hoping that the honest members of BBB #14 keep going until they do.
as i said then and i mean sincerely, my conscience would not have allowed me to scoop up ten guys i knew were cut by a disinterested owner like that. would not happen on my team

Originally posted by mgse
Originally posted by Lef Grebo

Ummm no.

I am pointing out the fallacies in your arguments, not making any comments about you as a person. There is a great big difference. I am having a debate about issues, your getting all personal. That usually happens when someone has run out of arguments to support his conclusions. Once again that says nothing to your character or the shape of your head, just that you have run out of germain arguments.



Forgive me for not poking a hole in all of shacky21's statements. If the first is invalid, the rest are suspect. It is up to him to post proof, not for me to go through each and every one of his unsubstantiated statements.

If we take your track, someone could make 1 billion false statements and unless I proved all of them incorrect, he is right.

lmao...about three or so posts after yours, another one of the players moved came in saying 'they were in over their heads' confirming the first conspiracy theory that they left because they were losing.

Bort has responded to my PM indicating that he has asked DD to take a look at the situation.


http://goallineblitz.com/game/message.pl?id=2516905

Lets see what happens.

Originally posted by General Terms
Bort has responded to my PM indicating that he has asked DD to take a look at the situation.


http://goallineblitz.com/game/message.pl?id=2516905

Fail... Just copy and paste please.