Warrior General Games

1) make coordinating a bit simpler - play casual. /sigh (NGTH)
2) EQ upgrades en mass - PITA clicking each piece to add the same ATT every 8 levels. (NGTH)
3) make forums fun again. hard to do with so many a-holes in residence, though.

Real #1) Get rid of WL and go back to Pro being top and then have a Pro tourney - one of the worst things that ever happened was the whole WL being added which caused rest of game to just be meh. Get rid of WL ASAP, make Pro tops again, and have a true Pro tourney after every season to determine top dog in GLB. Yeah, will piss off the WL-elite (lol - elite in a dot game, whuddathinkit?!?!), but it's about the #1 best thing that can be done to (re)inject fun into this game. WL killed things big time. (again, NGTH)

So the best things that will bring GLB back to a fun-state are all...

NGTH!

I seriously stopped giving a fuck about this game when they took away the pyramid. Tp this day, outside of the WL I don't understand the structure at all. Regional national pro elite casual veteran #1? Yea that sounds fun.

Originally posted by Black Peter
1) make coordinating a bit simpler - play casual. /sigh (NGTH)
2) EQ upgrades en mass - PITA clicking each piece to add the same ATT every 8 levels. (NGTH)
3) make forums fun again. hard to do with so many a-holes in residence, though.

Real #1) Get rid of WL and go back to Pro being top and then have a Pro tourney - one of the worst things that ever happened was the whole WL being added which caused rest of game to just be meh. Get rid of WL ASAP, make Pro tops again, and have a true Pro tourney after every season to determine top dog in GLB. Yeah, will piss off the WL-elite (lol - elite in a dot game, whuddathinkit?!?!), but it's about the #1 best thing that can be done to (re)inject fun into this game. WL killed things big time. (again, NGTH)

So the best things that will bring GLB back to a fun-state are all...

NGTH!




Amen

Originally posted by Black Peter
1) make coordinating a bit simpler - play casual. /sigh (NGTH)
2) EQ upgrades en mass - PITA clicking each piece to add the same ATT every 8 levels. (NGTH)
3) make forums fun again. hard to do with so many a-holes in residence, though.

Real #1) Get rid of WL and go back to Pro being top and then have a Pro tourney - one of the worst things that ever happened was the whole WL being added which caused rest of game to just be meh. Get rid of WL ASAP, make Pro tops again, and have a true Pro tourney after every season to determine top dog in GLB. Yeah, will piss off the WL-elite (lol - elite in a dot game, whuddathinkit?!?!), but it's about the #1 best thing that can be done to (re)inject fun into this game. WL killed things big time. (again, NGTH)

So the best things that will bring GLB back to a fun-state are all...

NGTH!



It's impressive that you have the ability to be wrong about every single thing.

Originally posted by jdbolick

It's impressive that you have the ability to be wrong about every single thing.

About as impressive as your ability to eat your toes every time you post. Yummy fungus!

I also wish we could go back to the pyramid system.

Originally posted by jdbolick

It's impressive that you have the ability to be wrong about every single thing.

Why do you feel that's wrong?

We're still working on Goal Line Blitz and will always continue to do so despite any other projects that we might be working on. Remember, however, that this game is out of Beta now and the changes that will be implemented will be few and far between and will be mainly minor cosmetic additions. I do a seasonal review of the suggestions forum and present a list to Bort for his review each season. Just because I say something is on the list, however, does it mean that it is going to get implemented. Ultimately, it is Bort's decision as it is his game and his vision of the game that matters to GLB. Case in point, the EQ upgrade tool. Bort reviewed it and nixed the idea (and there's a huge difference between doing batch boost and batch EQ upgrades but I'll let Bort explain that at the next Q & A as it's more his issue to explain).

He think keeping us click 900+ times is cool?
That's fine, no anymore flex buying, done.

Originally posted by aaasahi
He think keeping us click 900+ times is cool?
That's fine, no anymore flex buying, done.

There could be a very good reason he/they can't. I don't think it has anything to do with not wanting to do it and more to do with can't do it. Catch said as much at the end of his post and that Bort will address it in the next Q&A.

Originally posted by BadgerPhil
There could be a very good reason he/they can't. I don't think it has anything to do with not wanting to do it and more to do with can't do it. Catch said as much at the end of his post and that Bort will address it in the next Q&A.

We are not allowed to ask/talk about suggestions in The Q&A. Not sure why, but can't even voice player building issues as this in GLB main either.

You aren't allowed to ask about suggestions because people will just be flooding the thread with suggestions which isn't the point of the QnA.

Originally posted by Phantom Of The Opera
We are not allowed to ask/talk about suggestions in The Q&A. Not sure why, but can't even voice player building issues as this in GLB main either.

I took it to mean, he will make a post/statement about it. Doesn't need to be asked by anyone. It will be addressed, why changes to how EQ works and/or is updated is challenging.

*Me speaking here* Possibly he'll give us some insight on how that process works so suggestions in regards to EQ will be more on target.

Originally posted by aaasahi
He think keeping us click 900+ times is cool?
That's fine, no anymore flex buying, done.

To touch on this again, Changing how EQ is upgraded is not dead, the ideas as presented are. But Catch did confirm that the idea, in general, is not dead. Though that still doesn't mean it will get implemented soon or at all.

Here is the criteria for green lighting a suggestion, per Catch.

Originally posted by Catch22
There are often a number of factors that go into whether we implement a suggestion or not and ultimately it comes down to the following:

1) Will it improve the user experience with the game
2) Is there a business reason for implementing the suggestion
3) Does the cost of devoting the coding time to implementing the suggestion make sense

All three of those things must be yes answers for us to even consider implementing a suggestion and then we have the final determining factor.

4) Do the developers feel the suggestion works with their vision of the game