Warrior General Games

Obviously you never majored in English. In the second portion of the sentence the "when" modifies the action, in this case the action is "...not look[ing] like an idiot.."

The first half of the sentence necessitates a "when" or the word "in." You'll see that if you substitute the word "in" for "when" in the first conjunction, that the second is actually not superfluous to the overall construct of the sentence. While using the double "when" is a bit archaic for modern conversation it is still not considered redundant.

As for the virgin comment, you're going to try to pin an error in the English language with me on a message board (unsuccessfully), and then try to imply that I'm the virgin?

Now that truly is funny.

Originally posted by billyvassi

I heard Obama might be a muslim, do you have an opinion on this issue?

Also, Mccain would just be a 3rd Bush term.

Obama is not a muslim. McCain's views are not entirely consistent with Bush's, so no it wouldn't just be a third Bush term.

Anymore sidetracking?

I've already gotten 300 PMs congratulating me on exposing your grammar lie.

Originally posted by Ballbright
Originally posted by billyvassi


I heard Obama might be a muslim, do you have an opinion on this issue?

Also, Mccain would just be a 3rd Bush term.

Obama is not a muslim. McCain's views are not entirely consistent with Bush's, so no it wouldn't just be a third Bush term.

Anymore sidetracking?


If you put mentos in diet coke it doesn't fizz up.

Originally posted by billyvassi
I've already gotten 300 PMs congratulating me on exposing your grammar lie.



Yet another lie from a Bandit...and it isn't an error.

Next

Originally posted by Ballbright
Originally posted by billyvassi

I've already gotten 300 PMs congratulating me on exposing your grammar lie.



Yet another lie from a Bandit...and it isn't an error.

Next

How do you know it's a lie? Are you saying you hacked my account to check my PMs?

I'm submitting a support request!

Jean-Luc Picard was a better captain than Kirk.

Originally posted by billyvassi
Originally posted by Ballbright

Originally posted by billyvassi


I've already gotten 300 PMs congratulating me on exposing your grammar lie.



Yet another lie from a Bandit...and it isn't an error.

Next

How do you know it's a lie? Are you saying you hacked my account to check my PMs?

I'm submitting a support request!

Because you can't have 300 PMs in your inbox. The maximum allowed is 150 you moron.

I didn't say they were all sitting in my inbox at the same time you silly goose.

Originally posted by billyvassi
I didn't say they were all sitting in my inbox at the same time you silly goose.

In the amount of time that elapsed between when you posted it, and when you posted your claim, there wouldn't have been enough time for you to read them all.

Regardless, we all know you're lying, and should expect any less from a guy busted lying before.

OK, get a room you two.

From now on I'm just going to make sure the following gets posted on every page...



For those that don't understand why I'm so bent over this, here is just one sentence from Billyvassi that explains why...

Originally posted by billyvassi

I IMed catspaw and asked if he would like that CB, he said yes and offered a fair trade for him of equal levels. He didn't even know I was gutting a team.




Aside from the outright lie that the trade was for "equal levels" (it was an inactive player who had been that way all season), he admits to contacting an owner of a team he was on with the sole purpose of bettering that team at the expense of the one he was GMing.

He admits he is gutting the team, he admits he contacted the owner of the team he is on (Catspaw27), and he admits to setting up the deal. BillyVasssi knew, from the Bandit's private forum, that Catspaw27 wanted a CB.

Gutting is illegal. Trading players from a team you're gutting to a team you're on is unethical.

Colluding, as defined by this site, is stripping a team of it's resources for the purpose of benefiting another. I'll understand if you don't see it the way I do, but that is what I see having occurred here.

The fact that Billy mislead the mods and others in the original thread claiming not to have traded people to teams he was on, and the fact that the Bandits attempted to cover it up when one of their own was honest enough to point it out, only exacerbates the look of impropriety here.

Those are the issues to me...everything else in this convoluted thread is peripheral.

It's up to 700 PMs now. This time they are all in my inbox at once. This is really cool.

Here's an interesting thing: Bort just made a bunch of new rules about gutting and collusion for next season. Nothing that happened is against them either. lolz.