Warrior General Games

Globe Trotters are in the west, they are our rival (saints)


anyone know if we can train on intense and get exp instead of play the scrimmages

train on intense you dont lose seasonal energy in scrimmage games

Originally posted by kcote75
Originally posted by dontmeswidme

ken cote just showed why he is overrated.

How do you figure? Do you know what the defensive settings were cuz I sure as hell never do, lol.



3 tackles for a *mvp candidate*

while law jackson and minister had vicious games.

Ken Cote is stating that they didn't know what the teams settings were nor have they most of the year. They just play on hard intensity I guess and hope to guess the strategy. I actually think it would be tougher to play well like that than knowing the strategy.

Originally posted by dontmeswidme
Originally posted by kcote75

Originally posted by dontmeswidme


ken cote just showed why he is overrated.

How do you figure? Do you know what the defensive settings were cuz I sure as hell never do, lol.



3 tackles for a *mvp candidate*

while law jackson and minister had vicious games.

U know, I've been watching this league all season, and i have to agree that kcote is overrated. All the teams with poor records, he beat up on and racked up the stats. When he had to have a big game against a good team, he winds up having like 2-4 tackles with none for loss and no sacks. Methinks overrated pass rusher, kind of like Javon Kearse, or any of those undersized pure-quicks at DE.

take away all sacks for Jackson against the teams the Mustangs held scoreless (aka never been edited) and he has 11 sacks. However he finished with 37. Hmmmmm. Ken Cotes take away the games against teams that Flathead held scoreless (aka growing teams who tried) he finishes with 13. As opposed to the total 24.

In conclusion, Jackson lived on fresh dumpster teams and thats why the inflated sack totals and FrostyMcPenos has no knowledge of the USA Pro League. East has the teams to beat up on, not the West.

Originally posted by morgan3
take away all sacks for Jackson against the teams the Mustangs held scoreless (aka never been edited) and he has 11 sacks. However he finished with 37. Hmmmmm. Ken Cotes take away the games against teams that Flathead held scoreless (aka growing teams who tried) he finishes with 13. As opposed to the total 24.

In conclusion, Jackson lived on fresh dumpster teams and thats why the inflated sack totals and FrostyMcPenos has no knowledge of the USA Pro League. East has the teams to beat up on, not the West.
You gotta good point there man Ken Not overated

Lets go with that for a moment, how many sacks/game did the 2 average when you take away the crappy teams from both sides?

i can proudly say ken cote got exactly zero sacks and zero hurries on my team and only three tackles

Originally posted by D-will
Originally posted by morgan3

take away all sacks for Jackson against the teams the Mustangs held scoreless (aka never been edited) and he has 11 sacks. However he finished with 37. Hmmmmm. Ken Cotes take away the games against teams that Flathead held scoreless (aka growing teams who tried) he finishes with 13. As opposed to the total 24.

In conclusion, Jackson lived on fresh dumpster teams and thats why the inflated sack totals and FrostyMcPenos has no knowledge of the USA Pro League. East has the teams to beat up on, not the West.
You gotta good point there man Ken Not overated


is that why law jackson got 2 sacks against a good team and ken cote got zero.

oh btw his team is eliminated my teams aren't..

Originally posted by dontmeswidme
Originally posted by D-will

Originally posted by morgan3


take away all sacks for Jackson against the teams the Mustangs held scoreless (aka never been edited) and he has 11 sacks. However he finished with 37. Hmmmmm. Ken Cotes take away the games against teams that Flathead held scoreless (aka growing teams who tried) he finishes with 13. As opposed to the total 24.

In conclusion, Jackson lived on fresh dumpster teams and thats why the inflated sack totals and FrostyMcPenos has no knowledge of the USA Pro League. East has the teams to beat up on, not the West.
You gotta good point there man Ken Not overated




oh btw his team is eliminated my teams aren't..
we are not talking about the supporting cast but which player is better ... I bet if he goes to like K-zoo he'll have way better stats then you

My whole point was to prove that Ken Cote is not overrated.

Honestly, I don't like to pay attention to the East's stats because they are so inflated its rediculous. If you want proof of that check out what the US West GlobeTrotters did against the Stingers. Guy threw 12 TDs in 1 game, and against the entire West he threw 14 all year. Sure the East has Philly, Stangs, Nasty and K-Zoo but after that its really a big drop off. The West has a solid 1-9 who can beat each other on any day.

Originally posted by morgan3
My whole point was to prove that Ken Cote is not overrated.

Honestly, I don't like to pay attention to the East's stats because they are so inflated its rediculous. If you want proof of that check out what the US West GlobeTrotters did against the Stingers. Guy threw 12 TDs in 1 game, and against the entire West he threw 14 all year. Sure the East has Philly, Stangs, Nasty and K-Zoo but after that its really a big drop off. The West has a solid 1-9 who can beat each other on any day.

I'm guessing resorting to that means if you do an average sacks/game for both players (not counting opponents who shouldn't have been in the league in the first place on both sides), it's not even close? I figure if it was, you would have backed up this ridiculous statement with some evidence.

Originally posted by Jed
Originally posted by morgan3

My whole point was to prove that Ken Cote is not overrated.

Honestly, I don't like to pay attention to the East's stats because they are so inflated its rediculous. If you want proof of that check out what the US West GlobeTrotters did against the Stingers. Guy threw 12 TDs in 1 game, and against the entire West he threw 14 all year. Sure the East has Philly, Stangs, Nasty and K-Zoo but after that its really a big drop off. The West has a solid 1-9 who can beat each other on any day.

I'm guessing resorting to that means if you do an average sacks/game for both players (not counting opponents who shouldn't have been in the league in the first place on both sides), it's not even close? I figure if it was, you would have backed up this ridiculous statement with some evidence.

The East has the best defense for sure.

Anyway, no need to argue anymore. You forgot the DLJ as well, once they boosted they beat Utopia and lost a relatively tight one to Kalamazoo.

I like how people in the West like to pretend there aren't any cupcake teams in their conference. It's kinda funny.