Warrior General Games

Originally posted by HoggLife
Are you SERIOUS. Read your first post. It isnt to attack Tim Harper?????????

Or just read the thread title, it has the same effect.

LOL

What are you talking about Hogg? You already said you don't care about my respect, so why are you all upset?

If you boosted to pick up wins to improve your seeding, well that's a fine strategy, nothing wrong with that in terms of your team goals, that is most important. But either way whether you intended to boost in fear of us or for some other reason, it doesnt' matter, that's all irrelevant, the boosting itself took the game off of the bragging rights radar screen, that's it.

So if you have a POINT to make, why don't you try REALLY hard to zero in on it and say it, rather than 18 blistering thoughts that go 'round and 'round and lead into disarray? HINT: Concentrate on just one single thought or point at a time, so you don't get lost on whatever it is you are trying to convey or discuss here in THIS thread.

Originally posted by HoggLife

Are you SERIOUS. Read your first post. It isnt to attack Tim Harper?????????


You have a poor concept of English. If I was attacking Tim Harper you would see a totally different conversation.

My thread is not an ATTACK, if you think it is an ATTACK, then look up the word ATTACK and try to apply the correct definition to the context of my words.

Really, my Call-out of a thread is more accurately, an INVITATION.

I'm saying, I CHALLENGE YOU TIM HARPER TO TRY AND BEAT ME IN THIS GLB STYLE GAME under the previously mentioned contentions of what makes it a true and genuine competition.

If he CHOOSES to accept the challenge, that's awesome! If he doesn't, well that's fine to. It's his choice and he can do whatever he wants, but whether he wants to play my game or not play my game, I don't currently have any reason or need or interest in attacking him. He hasn't done anything to me that would make me dislike him, there is no logical reason for me to be in a position of needing to attack him.

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by brigmar


Something's up with your logic circuits:

You think you have a stronger team.
Therefore it was valid for Hogg to boost to get the W, and the 'props'.
Yet when he does, the boost excuse comes out, and he was a chicken to boost, that he didn't "man up" and play you straight.
Yet you have the stronger team, right ?
Right?

One of you two put the money where their mouth is; The other, the foot.


Nope, nothing wrong here.

The props are when I think my team is stronger but he thinks his is stronger and we are playing on the same playing field, we both dont use boosts, or both have used boots. That hasn't happened yet.

Way to move the goalposts, Mr I-can't-lose-I'm-Invincible !!
By your own logic, DDL deserves no props because of all the teams you beat that you were clearly better than.

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
NOTE: thinking my team is stronger is based upon subjective criteria as well as boosting, if you want to debate what ingredients make a stronger team then you need to delineate that before bringing the concept of thinking a team is stronger invalidates my logic on the concept we are discussing. You can't just bundle all of this stuff in and make it black and white, you are trying to combine too much without establishing the framework for what your terms represent and what the values of your contentions are.

I can see your mouth moving, but all I hear is waa-waa-waa.

LOL, you're the guy who said "I think we're the stronger team", so the failure to define those terms was yours.

As was the failure to anticipate and react to his team boosting in order to redress the imbalance that you (and possibly he) perceived, especially since he 'guaranteed' that he would beat you.

Hogg talks alot of crap.

And by that, I do mean A LOT.

AN INCREDIBLE AMOUNT.

But he also walks the walk as far as GLB and his teams are concerned, doesn't just talk the talk.


Good luck with the games tomorrow all (except the Spartans, Daggers and Dump Trucks ).

Time for my scheduled 3 hours of sleep.

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
But either way whether you intended to boost in fear of us or for some other reason, it doesnt' matter, that's all irrelevant, the boosting itself took the game off of the bragging rights radar screen, that's it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flcv_TnH7Mk

TSE = Death

"A Hit. You sank my battleship....Best 2 out of 3"
"Best 3 out of 5"
"Best of 7?"
"Damn Right !!"

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert
Originally posted by HoggLife


Are you SERIOUS. Read your first post. It isnt to attack Tim Harper?????????


You have a poor concept of English. If I was attacking Tim Harper you would see a totally different conversation.

My thread is not an ATTACK, if you think it is an ATTACK, then look up the word ATTACK and try to apply the correct definition to the context of my words.

Really, my Call-out of a thread is more accurately, an INVITATION.

I'm saying, I CHALLENGE YOU TIM HARPER TO TRY AND BEAT ME IN THIS GLB STYLE GAME under the previously mentioned contentions of what makes it a true and genuine competition.

If he CHOOSES to accept the challenge, that's awesome! If he doesn't, well that's fine to. It's his choice and he can do whatever he wants, but whether he wants to play my game or not play my game, I don't currently have any reason or need or interest in attacking him. He hasn't done anything to me that would make me dislike him, there is no logical reason for me to be in a position of needing to attack him.

But if he "ACCEPTS" your challenge will it be meaningful in any way for him?????

No.

Why????

Cause DDL has done nothing to be compared to a team of the Mustangs caliber in the Pros yet. I talk my talk but I dont say the Warpath are the same as the Mustangs. The Mustangs have a USA Pro Championship trophy and are back to back Eastern Conference Champs. Beating DDL means nothing to him but if you beat the Mustangs it will mean the world to you. So give 1 good reason why Tim and the Mustangs needs to accept any kind of challenge from you a guy that has once again done absolutely NOTHING in the Pros????????

Somehow winning with 6 of your own players on a team makes it not legitimate? Who cares how many players he has on the team? El Jefe has 5 players on your team. How is a GM of a team having 5 players on it any different than an owner of a team having 6? 2 of Tim's "ringers" don't even start. He has 3 of his own players starting. That somehow makes his accomplishments meaningless? I have nothing against you personally TSE, but this seems like just a promotional stunt because what you are saying doesn't make that much sense.

El Jefe - 5 players on DDL
xManning1018x - 3 players on DDL
Raves - 3 players on DDL
7 other owners have 2 players on DDL

So you cut those 16 excess players on DDL, then Tim can cut his 5 extra players that he owns and we will see who would win a "1-on-1 battle". That is the way you worded your challenge isn't it? One owner per player on the team.

Originally posted by brigmar
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert

But either way whether you intended to boost in fear of us or for some other reason, it doesnt' matter, that's all irrelevant, the boosting itself took the game off of the bragging rights radar screen, that's it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flcv_TnH7Mk

TSE = Death

"A Hit. You sank my battleship....Best 2 out of 3"
"Best 3 out of 5"
"Best of 7?"
"Damn Right !!"




LOL Pretty much but you boosted during the 3 out of 5 so it doesnt count anyways

Originally posted by HoggLife
LOL Pretty much but you boosted during the 3 out of 5 so it doesnt count anyways

I was going to say that you were Bill & Ted, but they talk way more sense

tl; dr

is there a rodney king quote in here somewhere?

Originally posted by HoggLife


Cause DDL has done nothing to be compared to a team of the Mustangs caliber in the Pros yet. I talk my talk but I dont say the Warpath are the same as the Mustangs. The Mustangs have a USA Pro Championship trophy and are back to back Eastern Conference Champs. Beating DDL means nothing to him but if you beat the Mustangs it will mean the world to you. So give 1 good reason why Tim and the Mustangs needs to accept any kind of challenge from you a guy that has once again done absolutely NOTHING in the Pros????????

1 good reason that's it?

Because I'm the best, and if he wants to be the best one day, the road goes through me.

Originally posted by tpaterniti
Somehow winning with 6 of your own players on a team makes it not legitimate? Who cares how many players he has on the team? El Jefe has 5 players on your team. How is a GM of a team having 5 players on it any different than an owner of a team having 6? 2 of Tim's "ringers" don't even start. He has 3 of his own players starting. That somehow makes his accomplishments meaningless? I have nothing against you personally TSE, but this seems like just a promotional stunt because what you are saying doesn't make that much sense.

El Jefe - 5 players on DDL
xManning1018x - 3 players on DDL
Raves - 3 players on DDL
7 other owners have 2 players on DDL

So you cut those 16 excess players on DDL, then Tim can cut his 5 extra players that he owns and we will see who would win a "1-on-1 battle". That is the way you worded your challenge isn't it? One owner per player on the team.

Not a promotional stunt, why would I trying to promote anything?

Starting is irrelevant, if a guy plays 40 plays in a game, whether he's in on the first snap or which 40 snaps, makes no difference. This just confirms that you aren't paying attention to details of how the game works and what the numbers mean or represent.

All those guys on my team are fair material that I worked for and have to maintain. That's the game. I also think I have more players on my team that own their own teams than any other owner. Why do I think that? Well we have about 10 that do, and I posted a thread in the forum to see if anybody had more, and no replies, so to my knowledge we are at the top of that game as well, which is just another challenge.

I've also traded away some of the guys that had multiple players on the team at various occasions as well.

Originally posted by The Strategy Expert

1 good reason that's it?

Because I'm the best, and if he wants to be the best one day, the road goes through me.

Update: The road actually went over you 15-6

With two Eastern titles and a USA Pro title, he's got a better claim to that attitude than you. Hell, the Extreme have a a Western title and USA Pro title in a deeper conference, and have a better claim than you.

Originally posted by brigmar
Originally posted by The Strategy Expert


1 good reason that's it?

Because I'm the best, and if he wants to be the best one day, the road goes through me.

Update: The road actually went over you 15-6

With two Eastern titles and a USA Pro title, he's got a better claim to that attitude than you. Hell, the Extreme have a a Western title and USA Pro title in a deeper conference, and have a better claim than you.

I disagree with your rationale, but thanks for the score update, I didn't know the result yet, I thought the game hadn't simmed yet, thanks for the news bulletin.