Warrior General Games

Originally posted by The Avenger
Just clearly DEFINE Astrophysically to us and i will be on my way. I can define "the" to you in Websters. I just want to see the same. That is all, lets see it.


PS, why does Astrophysically come up as an auto spelling error on my screen just like it does for words like LOL or ROFL?

http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5169628&page=16#48470232 for the full report.

Astrophysically is an adverb that means, "in accordance with astrophysical laws." It has the same function as physically, chemically, literally, you are a moron, etc. Did you know that astrobiologically is a word as well?

We get it, you rely on GLB to tell you what is a word and what is not. GG

So in regards to acceleration of expansion, are we using the spectrum change?

AKA red shift?

I was under the impression that was expected to weaken, or universe expansion was slowing. That was a decade ago, so not up on the latest.

Yes redshift or z-factor is the relevant evidence. It had been suggested on unsubstantiated data before, but was conclusively documented in the late 90s.

Supernovae in other galaxies and CMBR are the easiest methods to test redshift.

Originally posted by Outlaw Dogs
Anything to prove you are still alive Bort.

+1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Since there has not been any proof of life, I conclude that DD & Cornblow did indeed kill Bort and steal GLB from him. I have contacted Nick Burkhart to hunt down the dynamic duo that killed Bort and bring them to justice.

Originally posted by Donk3yMan
http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5169628&page=16#48470232 for the full report.

Astrophysically is an adverb that means, "in accordance with astrophysical laws." It has the same function as physically, chemically, literally, you are a moron, etc. Did you know that astrobiologically is a word as well?

We get it, you rely on GLB to tell you what is a word and what is not. GG

So many spelling errors in this, so many words underlined in red, so much fale. << see that one, it's underlined in red along with your Scrabble "only" winning words.

Originally posted by The Avenger
Originally posted by Donk3yMan

http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5169628&page=16#48470232 for the full report.

Astrophysically is an adverb that means, "in accordance with astrophysical laws." It has the same function as physically, chemically, literally, you are a moron, etc. Did you know that astrobiologically is a word as well?

We get it, you rely on GLB to tell you what is a word and what is not. GG

So many spelling errors in this, so many words underlined in red, so much fale. << see that one, it's underlined in red along with your Scrabble "only" winning words.

https://news.slac.stanford.edu/announcement/studying-astrophysically-relevant-current-instabilities-and-collisionless-shocks-labora

That took all of about 2 seconds

Originally posted by jimmiejoe
https://news.slac.stanford.edu/announcement/studying-astrophysically-relevant-current-instabilities-and-collisionless-shocks-labora

That took all of about 2 seconds

Avenger likes to advertise his own stupidity on a regular basis. Normally he contains it to the Casual Pro forum, but I suppose he is feeling adventurous .

At this point I'm not sure what he is trying to accomplish, as I already thoroughly skewered him over in CPL. He just wants everybody on the website to think he is an idiot I suppose. I've also already posted published academic articles from experts in astrophysics, like these.

http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/522/1/305/pdf/0004-637X_522_1_305.pdf
https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/1811/44623/apjs-rrc-siseq.pdf?sequence=1
http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/230/1/012028

Originally posted by Donk3yMan
Avenger likes to advertise his own stupidity on a regular basis. Normally he contains it to the Casual Pro forum, but I suppose he is feeling adventurous .

At this point I'm not sure what he is trying to accomplish, as I already thoroughly skewered him over in CPL. He just wants everybody on the website to think he is an idiot I suppose. I've also already posted published academic articles from experts in astrophysics, like these.

http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/522/1/305/pdf/0004-637X_522_1_305.pdf
https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/1811/44623/apjs-rrc-siseq.pdf?sequence=1
http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/230/1/012028


I can't find a SINGLE spell checker that says this "scrabble only" word is correct in the English vocabulary. Not a single one. Be it a paid site or free, Microsoft Word or Firefox, Chrome, Google, etc, etc.


Like i said before and i'll say it again and own you every time: ASTROPHYSICALLY or supercalifragilistic they are one in the same in the English language, both can be used in a LOLarticle all day in night as your weak ass examples, but neither are real.

Originally posted by The Avenger
Originally posted by Donk3yMan

Avenger likes to advertise his own stupidity on a regular basis. Normally he contains it to the Casual Pro forum, but I suppose he is feeling adventurous .

At this point I'm not sure what he is trying to accomplish, as I already thoroughly skewered him over in CPL. He just wants everybody on the website to think he is an idiot I suppose. I've also already posted published academic articles from experts in astrophysics, like these.

http://iopscience.iop.org/0004-637X/522/1/305/pdf/0004-637X_522_1_305.pdf
https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/1811/44623/apjs-rrc-siseq.pdf?sequence=1
http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/230/1/012028


I can't find a SINGLE spell checker that says this "scrabble only" word is correct in the English vocabulary. Not a single one. Be it a paid site or free, Microsoft Word or Firefox, Chrome, Google, etc, etc.


Like i said before and i'll say it again and own you every time: ASTROPHYSICALLY or supercalifragilistic they are one in the same in the English language, both can be used in a LOLarticle all day in night as your weak ass examples, but neither are real.

Astrophysically is in the online websters here

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/astrophysics

where it says adverb

apparently-ically some are not good at Googling either.

haha

soo many iliterut peepel in this thred

Originally posted by The Avenger
I can't find a SINGLE spell checker that says this "scrabble only" word is correct in the English vocabulary. Not a single one. Be it a paid site or free, Microsoft Word or Firefox, Chrome, Google, etc, etc.


Like i said before and i'll say it again and own you every time: ASTROPHYSICALLY or supercalifragilistic they are one in the same in the English language, both can be used in a LOLarticle all day in night as your weak ass examples, but neither are real.

Actually every word known to mankind is made up, we made them up and turned them into words that meant something. This is why you will see words in the newest dictionaries that you can't find in older ones.

Originally posted by The Avenger
I can't find a SINGLE spell checker that says this "scrabble only" word is correct in the English vocabulary. Not a single one. Be it a paid site or free, Microsoft Word or Firefox, Chrome, Google, etc, etc.


Like i said before and i'll say it again and own you every time: ASTROPHYSICALLY or supercalifragilistic they are one in the same in the English language, both can be used in a LOLarticle all day in night as your weak ass examples, but neither are real.

I cannot help that you are stupid. I have tried to discourage you from telling everyone else how stupid you are, but I cannot seem to help that either.