Originally posted by Jack_MuFc
This whole Mithgate thats happening now made me think. Is there really much difference in an agent owning a team and only having a QB and a WR and an agent owning a team and fills out the roster?
This seems unfair to me. Take this team for example. http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/team.pl?team_id=1594
He offense is 95% rush, But nobody says anything. Obviously we can't control what people spend their Flex on but this shouldn't be allowed in my opinion. It's not fair to every other agent that doesn't want to spend 100s of dollars in making a full squad.Hi, seeing it’s my team you single out - I figure I’ll retort.
I made my team purely because, being a newbie to GLB I had no network and my players would never get recruited (I assume because they are poorly built), no1 in their right mind would allow me to OC/DC their team and fundamentally it’s a hostile, frosty and unwelcoming place. Fortunately I enjoy the game immensely; money isn't a concern and so making a team was an obvious option.
I'm not stat-padding players; I rush a lot because it's effective in lower level leagues - my pass game will emerge in a few seasons. I think it's inappropriate to make an analogous comparison of my team and that other guy who owned half a conference and brand us both cheaters, that isn't fair - please just let me bumble around aimlessly with my team in peace.