User Pass
Home Sign Up Contact Log In
Forum > Goal Line Blitz > Agents owning a full team debate.
Page:
 
Whiley
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Diamond Spade
ppl pay to see there dots be stars not role players.


Then people should pay and build good dots. I'm not going to start Ryan Mallett just because he's complaining if i have Tom Brady.
Edited by Jack_MuFc on May 17, 2014 20:18:43
 
RiverRat2
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Diamond Spade
ppl pay to see there dots be stars not role players.


Than buy your own team and run it. Don't expect an owner to do it for you.
 
tpaterniti
Lead Mod
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Diamond Spade
the only advantage a one agent team has over everyone else is a guarantee that all tactics are set exactly as the agent want.


People still change tactics?
 
Diamond Spade
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by RiverRat2
Than buy your own team and run it. Don't expect an owner to do it for you.


im not disagreeing im just saying y ppl get mad.
 
Diamond Spade
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tpaterniti
People still change tactics?


idk but the point is if u own every dot theres no doubt where as everyone else has to just trust its set accordingly
 
Theo Wizzago
Coyote
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by tpaterniti
People still change tactics?


Bet yer sweet bippy!!!
 
RiverRat2
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Diamond Spade
im not disagreeing im just saying y ppl get mad.


Not mad.
Just tired of agents and their "demands"
I will be out of flex soon and will quietly fade away.
 
aaasahi
offline
Link
 
http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/team.pl?team_id=74
One man agent, 100% rush attack (not 95%!)
Better example for you to complain?
 
aaasahi
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Jack_MuFc
So you're saying a level 79 with an EL of 69 can't get into WL?

You trippin. #Sarcasm #Hashtag


Well, not saying they can't, but most owner wouldn't let it happen.
 
_OSIRIS_
offline
Link
 
One man teams have a huge advantage, if the agent is actually good of course. The word unfair is absolutely ridiculous however because everyone is able to do it.
 
Mephix
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Jack_MuFc
This whole Mithgate thats happening now made me think. Is there really much difference in an agent owning a team and only having a QB and a WR and an agent owning a team and fills out the roster?

This seems unfair to me. Take this team for example. http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/team.pl?team_id=1594

He offense is 95% rush, But nobody says anything. Obviously we can't control what people spend their Flex on but this shouldn't be allowed in my opinion. It's not fair to every other agent that doesn't want to spend 100s of dollars in making a full squad.


Hi, seeing it’s my team you single out - I figure I’ll retort.

I made my team purely because, being a newbie to GLB I had no network and my players would never get recruited (I assume because they are poorly built), no1 in their right mind would allow me to OC/DC their team and fundamentally it’s a hostile, frosty and unwelcoming place. Fortunately I enjoy the game immensely; money isn't a concern and so making a team was an obvious option.

I'm not stat-padding players; I rush a lot because it's effective in lower level leagues - my pass game will emerge in a few seasons. I think it's inappropriate to make an analogous comparison of my team and that other guy who owned half a conference and brand us both cheaters, that isn't fair - please just let me bumble around aimlessly with my team in peace.
 
Whiley
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by Mephix
Hi, seeing it’s my team you single out - I figure I’ll retort.

I made my team purely because, being a newbie to GLB I had no network and my players would never get recruited (I assume because they are poorly built), no1 in their right mind would allow me to OC/DC their team and fundamentally it’s a hostile, frosty and unwelcoming place. Fortunately I enjoy the game immensely; money isn't a concern and so making a team was an obvious option.

I'm not stat-padding players; I rush a lot because it's effective in lower level leagues - my pass game will emerge in a few seasons. I think it's inappropriate to make an analogous comparison of my team and that other guy who owned half a conference and brand us both cheaters, that isn't fair - please just let me bumble around aimlessly with my team in peace.


Hows it going bro, Let me first start by apologizing.

I didn't mean to offend. I'm not calling you a cheat. I can't see your Dots builds but judging by how you're destroying every team, i presume they are built well. As for OC/DC, I would of let anyone OC/DC my team before the season started.

I also have no network, I just mingle with some guys from the forums and have a laugh. You are right though, i shouldn't of compared you to Mith, that was wrong and you're not in the same boat.

This thread wasn't really thought out very well. I was just voicing an opinion. Sorry again.
 
_OSIRIS_
offline
Link
 
I don't know how you can call Mith a cheater when nothing has been done yet about this guy.

http://glb.warriorgeneral.com/game/team.pl?season=18&team_id=7837
 
Mephix
offline
Link
 
clever
 
hatchman
Goat Father
offline
Link
 
Originally posted by _OSIRIS_
One man teams have a huge advantage, if the agent is actually good of course. The word unfair is absolutely ridiculous however because everyone is able to do it.


where is the advantage seriously everyone on a multi agent team has the same freaking opportunities to build their dots and set their tactics the same dang way 1 agent teams do. if you have agents that are building scrub dots and aren't setting tactics and assigning VAs as requested. then you as a owner are failing because you are choosing to own and run a team with people that aren't trustworthy. there is no freaking advantage for 1 agent teams. if anything 1 agent teams are at a disadvantage because we have to spend so much time building so many players and doing all the work on the team.
 
Page:
 


You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.