Originally posted by kevindurant35
ball in jeff's court
ball in jeff's court
jeffgarcia
offline
offline
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
And if you wanna get even deeper into it, they have a combined record of 24-59
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
And if you wanna get even deeper into it, they have a combined record of 24-59
demonicangel
offline
offline
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
And if you wanna get even deeper into it, they have a combined record of 24-59
Ya thats what I thought. Your.
http://sio.midco.net/sublime/home/pwnd.jpg
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
And if you wanna get even deeper into it, they have a combined record of 24-59
Ya thats what I thought. Your.
http://sio.midco.net/sublime/home/pwnd.jpg
kevindurant35
offline
offline
Originally posted by kevindurant35
Originally posted by kevindurant35
ball deep in jeff's court
Originally posted by kevindurant35
ball deep in jeff's court
demonicangel
offline
offline
Originally posted by kevindurant35
Originally posted by kevindurant35
Originally posted by kevindurant35
ball deep in jeff's court
He cant say ne thing. He has amitted that he thinks its impossible to produce a qb that can play high levels.
His qb has struggled against teams that are top 5.
Without his padded stats, his qb is below Par.
Claims my padded stats come from teams, that are in my Top 5.
His quarterback has more attributes than mine, even though he is 4 levels higher.
Did I miss anything?
Originally posted by kevindurant35
Originally posted by kevindurant35
ball deep in jeff's court
He cant say ne thing. He has amitted that he thinks its impossible to produce a qb that can play high levels.
His qb has struggled against teams that are top 5.
Without his padded stats, his qb is below Par.
Claims my padded stats come from teams, that are in my Top 5.
His quarterback has more attributes than mine, even though he is 4 levels higher.
Did I miss anything?
jeffgarcia
offline
offline
Let's try this one...
10 teams I've played are a combined 48-44. 11 teams you've played, 57-70.
10 teams I've played are a combined 48-44. 11 teams you've played, 57-70.
demonicangel
offline
offline
What he is waiting on is that his qb plays within the hour, against a 7-3 team. If he does decent, he will come in here talking shit. If he doesnt do good, it will be back to the I am in a higher league, its the toughest league.
demonicangel
offline
offline
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
Let's try this one...
10 teams I've played are a combined 48-44. 11 teams you've played, 57-70.
Against your top 5?
Against my top 5?
I win my games, you lose yours.
We are undefeated. Your not even close.
Let's try this one...
10 teams I've played are a combined 48-44. 11 teams you've played, 57-70.
Against your top 5?
Against my top 5?
I win my games, you lose yours.
We are undefeated. Your not even close.
jeffgarcia
offline
offline
Originally posted by demonicangel
What he is waiting on is that his qb plays within the hour, against a 7-3 team. If he does decent, he will come in here talking shit. If he doesnt do good, it will be back to the I am in a higher league, its the toughest league.
Lol. I talk shit no matter what. And it's a fact, I AM in the tougher league.
What he is waiting on is that his qb plays within the hour, against a 7-3 team. If he does decent, he will come in here talking shit. If he doesnt do good, it will be back to the I am in a higher league, its the toughest league.
Lol. I talk shit no matter what. And it's a fact, I AM in the tougher league.
jeffgarcia
offline
offline
Originally posted by demonicangel
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
Let's try this one...
10 teams I've played are a combined 48-44. 11 teams you've played, 57-70.
Against your top 5?
Against my top 5?
I win my games, you lose yours.
We are undefeated. Your not even close.
QBs don't win games. Teams win games.
Conclusion of this argument, I win, you lose. Good day sir.
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
Let's try this one...
10 teams I've played are a combined 48-44. 11 teams you've played, 57-70.
Against your top 5?
Against my top 5?
I win my games, you lose yours.
We are undefeated. Your not even close.
QBs don't win games. Teams win games.
Conclusion of this argument, I win, you lose. Good day sir.
Last edited Jul 3, 2008 12:20:33
demonicangel
offline
offline
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
Originally posted by demonicangel
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
Let's try this one...
10 teams I've played are a combined 48-44. 11 teams you've played, 57-70.
Against your top 5?
Against my top 5?
I win my games, you lose yours.
We are undefeated. Your not even close.
QBs don't win games. Teams win games.
Conclusion of this argument, I win, you lose. Good day sir.
Ok be gone then. Your a idiot, and everyone posting in the Qb forums knows this.
Originally posted by demonicangel
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
Let's try this one...
10 teams I've played are a combined 48-44. 11 teams you've played, 57-70.
Against your top 5?
Against my top 5?
I win my games, you lose yours.
We are undefeated. Your not even close.
QBs don't win games. Teams win games.
Conclusion of this argument, I win, you lose. Good day sir.
Ok be gone then. Your a idiot, and everyone posting in the Qb forums knows this.
demonicangel
offline
offline
Originally posted by jeffgarcia
At least I know correct grammar and English.
Oh the irony.
Ahhh thats what it is, your just a kid.....Oh I should of known. Kids always think there right.
At least I know correct grammar and English.
Oh the irony.
Ahhh thats what it is, your just a kid.....Oh I should of known. Kids always think there right.
You are not logged in. Please log in if you want to post a reply.
