Warrior General Games

Originally posted by jdbolick
I can't believe no one mentioned "scaling" yet. Oh wait, yes I can, because most posters on GLB run their mouths without understanding anything.

http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5087580&page=2#47410090 kind of

Originally posted by gbororats
http://goallineblitz.com/game/forum_thread.pl?thread_id=5087580&page=2#47410090 kind of
Fair point. It just bugs me that people have the same stupid responses to this just like they have one for buggy coverage behavior (that one being "not enough vision").

chemistry alone would have caused a team to get blown out. low chemistry on a cpu team should have put the game in Mike's teams favor.

Originally posted by jdbolick

Fair point. It just bugs me that people have the same stupid responses to this just like they have one for buggy coverage behavior (that one being "not enough vision").

Players that are 79/16 being crappy isn't a stupid response.

Originally posted by Deathblade
Players that are 79/16 being crappy isn't a stupid response.

I only got like 3 dots with that severe of a decline

Originally posted by jdbolick

Fair point. It just bugs me that people have the same stupid responses to this just like they have one for buggy coverage behavior (that one being "not enough vision").

The problem is he came in blaming the game and rejecting advice critical of him instead of coming in and asking what he can do to get better so that he would beat that team 255-0. Had he simply asked how he could improve his team so that he could beat that team by worse, he would have received less harsh advice.

Originally posted by Mike Martz
I only got like 3 dots with that severe of a decline

It only took 1 CB with that severe decline to get passed all over upon.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
The problem is he came in blaming the game and rejecting advice critical of him instead of coming in and asking what he can do to get better so that he would beat that team 255-0. Had he simply asked how he could improve his team so that he could beat that team by worse, he would have received less harsh advice.
No, the problem is people posting a bunch of nonsense that has nothing to do with his actual question. How he can improve has nothing to do with why his team nearly lost to a team every other squad was demolishing.

Originally posted by bhall43
It only took 1 CB with that severe decline to get passed all over upon.

Bhall speaks truth. OP, watch your own replays and it is blatantly obvious. Just watch how slow Rod Woodson is on these replays

http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2357589&pbp_id=5264285
http://goallineblitz.com/game/replay.pl?game_id=2357589&pbp_id=5265450

If the CPU team had just attacked that CB all game, I can't imagine how bad the score might have been.

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
The problem is he came in blaming the game and rejecting advice critical of him instead of coming in and asking what he can do to get better so that he would beat that team 255-0. Had he simply asked how he could improve his team so that he could beat that team by worse, he would have received less harsh advice.

Wow! You really believe what you said huh?

Originally posted by Longhornfan1024
The problem is he came in blaming the game and rejecting advice critical of him instead of coming in and asking what he can do to get better so that he would beat that team 255-0. Had he simply asked how he could improve his team so that he could beat that team by worse, he would have received less harsh advice.

Did you even read his posts? He came in asking why, and was only told "you suck." He's 8-5 in his league, so even though you are correct that his team is not very good, he has beaten other teams that are handling the CPU team easily. So his rejection of the simple "you suck" explanation was logical.

The answer, like jd said, is scaling. The CPU team is generated based on his team's average level. Those decline dots hurt you not only by being bad dots, but also because they are driving up your team's average level, effectively making your opponent better.

Originally posted by Plankton


If the CPU team had just attacked that CB all game, I can't imagine how bad the score might have been.



Unfortunately I think u are right

Originally posted by Mike Martz
Unfortunately I think u are right

TBH, a CPU CB would probably be better for you than that guy.

Originally posted by Plankton
TBH, a CPU CB would probably be better for you than that guy.

"would probably be better"

A CPU CB would definitely be better.

Originally posted by Mike Martz
am I suppose to think you are so great?

im not great but i also know if i had a roster like yours, i wouldnt be crying if a cpu team almost beat me.

im not very good, but youre horrible. quit complaining and recruit a real roster.