Warrior General Games

Originally posted by bhall43
That was the main formation I told Catch I would like to see. Though after thinking about all the reasons why that is a great formation I don't know if it will be that good in a GLB setting. Plus it might be a really easy sack position with a straighter shot at the QB and the HB behind him coming up to block.

Let the linemen use their splits more effectively

Originally posted by toobad4u_00
Yeah, but wouldn't you would have more linemen scenarios and tagging becomes more of a deal there not?

Originally posted by bhall43
Absolutely people would need to either have to tag them or have them as their normal base defense set. That is going to come with oline players built to receive the ball though. That is when tagging becomes an awful mess.



----------------C,G,T,LG,LT,TE,TE
-----------------------------------------------------WR
---HB---FB--QB

This could be shot gun or under center. The last man on the LOS on the left side would be a eligible rec and so would the last man on the right. Place the back were ever you want.

I could see were you would want to tag but m2m would work and I dont know many even strength LB's who could not cover a OL.

Originally posted by joe


----------------C,G,T,LG,LT,TE,TE
-----------------------------------------------------WR
---HB---FB--QB

This could be shot gun or under center. The last man on the LOS on the left side would be a eligible rec and so would the last man on the right. Place the back were ever you want.

I could see were you would want to tag but m2m would work and I dont know many even strength LB's would could not cover a OL.


Until someone gets onto the idea of creating a new kind of center... .which would happen don't you think? Perhaps I am over thinking that though.

Originally posted by bhall43
Originally posted by spindoctor02

Can we get some flexbone love? Could be done with 2TEs, 1TE/1WR, or 2 WRs, doesn't really matter.

TE-LOT-LG-C-RG-ROT-TE
---HB---------QB----------HB
----------------FB

I think the huge problem there is creating valid GLB rushing plays to those HB's.

Could run sweeps from those plays, similar to what is done from Pro at the moment. Either have the HB parallel the LOS, or start initially backwards to take the handoff.

Originally posted by spindoctor02
Could run sweeps from those plays, similar to what is done from Pro at the moment. Either have the HB parallel the LOS, or start initially backwards to take the handoff.

Would be longer running than Pro Set/Wishbone. And the HB's would be only limited to sweeps left and right. I agree it would be fun for the FB though.

Originally posted by toobad4u_00
Until someone gets onto the idea of creating a new kind of center... .which would happen don't you think? Perhaps I am over thinking that though.

How different would you build a ST C other then adding catch to his build. In past seasons I built run blocking OT and played them at TE. yes they have a big opp and yes they do kinda suck but man it was cool as shit seeing them catch a couple of goalline TD on plays.

Originally posted by joe
How different would you build a ST C other then adding catch to his build. In past seasons I built run blocking OT and played them at TE. yes they have a big opp and yes they do kinda suck but man it was cool as shit seeing them catch a couple of goalline TD on plays.

fair enough, and good point.

No love for the West Coast Offense? I would like to see the Far and Near Formations. I miss those days of Larry Csonka and John Riggins running the FB Traps from those Formations. I try to do a little of that with the Strong and Weak I Formations but it's not the same.

I do love the Wishbone and glad to see it but as a DC, I dread the making of more Plays, lol.

Originally posted by bhall43
Originally posted by spindoctor02

Could run sweeps from those plays, similar to what is done from Pro at the moment. Either have the HB parallel the LOS, or start initially backwards to take the handoff.

Would be longer running than Pro Set/Wishbone. And the HB's would be only limited to sweeps left and right. I agree it would be fun for the FB though.

Just add in the triple option, and it'll all work itself out.

Oooo, this makes me excited! New formations, Yay!